• Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Global logoCarnegie lettermark logo
DemocracyIran
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Dmitri Trenin",
    "Alexander Baunov",
    "Andrei Kolesnikov",
    "Tatiana Stanovaya"
  ],
  "type": "commentary",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "Russia"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Economy"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

Commentary
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center

Did Putin Just Appoint Himself President for Life?

President Putin’s unexpected proposals this week to change the Russian constitution prompted the instant resignation of the Russian government. What’s he trying to achieve, and will he succeed?

Link Copied
By Dmitri Trenin, Alexander Baunov, Andrei Kolesnikov, Tatiana Stanovaya
Published on Jan 17, 2020

What’s everyone making such a fuss over right now in Russia?

Vladimir Putin appears to have finally set in motion the process of handing over the Kremlin to a successor after twenty years of running the country. Under the Russian constitution, which bars presidents from serving more than two consecutive terms, Putin must step down by the end of his current six-year term in 2024.  

In his state of the nation address on Wednesday, Putin outlined several changes to the constitution, which he suggested could be put to the Russian people in a referendum. These changes were:

— allowing parliament to appoint government ministers, including the prime minister (currently they are selected by the president and approved by the parliament);

— changing the constitution to bar presidents from serving more than two terms overall, and not just two consecutive terms;

— giving more power to the State Council, currently a fairly low-profile advisory body, and enshrining its role in the constitution;

— introducing additional restrictions on who can run for president, to prevent anyone who has not lived in Russia for the last twenty-five years or has ever held a foreign passport or residency permit from running;

— giving the Russian constitution precedence over international law.

Shortly after Putin announced these proposals, the government resigned, apparently to pave the way for Putin to start implementing his plans. The president swiftly reappointed Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev to deputy chair of the Security Council, a move that divided analysts. Some, like Tatiana Stanovaya, a nonresident scholar at the Carnegie Moscow Center, said Putin was getting rid of his long-term ally Medvedev, who is far less popular with voters. Others, such as Carnegie Moscow Center director Dmitri Trenin, said the new post means the long-serving prime minister is de facto the country’s second in command (since Putin is head of the Security Council), and have not ruled out Medvedev’s return to the presidency: he previously held the fort for Putin in 2008–2012 to enable the latter to adhere to the constitutional limit on consecutive terms.

Why is Putin doing this, and why now? 

Although Putin’s current term does not end for another four years, uncertainty over what would happen in 2024 has been making the Russian elite anxious for some time. The reforms are aimed at enabling Putin to retain influence over the political system when he is no longer president, thereby ensuring political stability and protecting Putin’s legacy from being undone by his successor.

Most of the reforms would take away power from the office of the presidency and redistribute it to the prime minister and parliament, ensuring that no future Russian president will ever amass as much power as Putin has. Russia will remain a strong presidential republic, however, and as things stand, no parliament is likely to make ministerial appointments against the wishes of the president. Putin himself may well take up a post in the newly enhanced State Council, allowing him to retain power and influence.

As for the new limit on terms, Putin may have served a total of four terms himself, but the suggestion now is that these were desperate times following the collapse of the Soviet Union and the turbulent 1990s, which required desperate measures. Those times, it is implied, are now over, says Alexander Baunov, a senior fellow at the Carnegie Moscow Center.  

Excluding people who have lived abroad from running for president would eliminate Russia’s main opposition figure, Alexei Navalny, as he studied in the United States. It would also rule out other discontented Russians who have moved abroad.

The most serious repercussions could stem from the move to put the Russian constitution above international law, according to Andrei Kolesnikov, chair of the Russian Domestic Politics and Political Institutions Program at the Carnegie Moscow Center. While Russia already regularly ignores judgements from the European Court of Human Rights ordering it to pay compensation, this would officially put an end to any help from abroad for victims of Russia’s corrupt legal system.

So is Putin president for life now?  

Some analysts had predicted Putin might change the constitution to allow him to stay on as president, or even create a new country from a merger with Belarus of which he would then become the first president. Putin has made it clear that there will be a new president in 2024. 

Moving to a new position while retaining significant influence is more akin to the maneuver seen last year in Kazakhstan, where Nursultan Nazarbayev relinquished the presidency after nearly three decades to become head of the Security Council, having enhanced that body’s power shortly before that. Since Putin’s proposed reforms would also increase the powers of the prime minister, some analysts are also suggesting that Putin might assume that role.

What are the implications for the West? 

If leaders in the West were hoping that 2024 would bring a change of policy in Russia, Putin’s comments should have put those expectations to rest. In the short term, there will be no change at all, says Kolesnikov. There may be a different face at the helm, but with Putin remaining backstage, his successor is unlikely to adopt a very different approach. 

Is there anything standing in Putin’s way?

Putin’s proposals will most likely be approved if a referendum is held, as the president’s approval ratings are consistently high. Nor does Putin face any resistance from any of the country’s political institutions. Constitutional changes will not encounter any serious obstacles in an authoritarian regime such as Russia, believes Kolesnikov.

About the Authors

Dmitri Trenin

Former Director, Carnegie Moscow Center

Trenin was director of the Carnegie Moscow Center from 2008 to early 2022.

Alexander Baunov

Senior Fellow, Editor-in-Chief, Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center

Baunov is a senior fellow and editor-in-chief at the Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center.

Andrei Kolesnikov

Former Senior Fellow, Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center

Kolesnikov was a senior fellow at the Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center.

Tatiana Stanovaya

Senior Fellow, Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center

Tatiana Stanovaya is a senior fellow at the Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center.

Authors

Dmitri Trenin
Former Director, Carnegie Moscow Center
Alexander Baunov
Senior Fellow, Editor-in-Chief, Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
Alexander Baunov
Andrei Kolesnikov
Former Senior Fellow, Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
Andrei Kolesnikov
Tatiana Stanovaya
Senior Fellow, Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
Tatiana Stanovaya
EconomyRussia

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

  • Worker pushing machinery toward a car frame
    Commentary
    Emissary
    Europe’s New Industrial Policy Can Learn From U.S. Mistakes

    Although the IAA often differs from the IRA, European policymakers can still take note of the U.S. act’s shortcomings.

      Milo McBride

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    What the Russian Energy Sector Stands to Gain From War in the Middle East

    The future trajectory of the U.S.-Iran war remains uncertain, but its impact on global energy trade flows and ties will be far-reaching. Moscow is likely to become a key beneficiary of these changes; the crisis in the Gulf also strengthens Russia’s hand in its relationships with China and India, where advantages might prove more durable.

      • Sergey Vakulenko

      Sergey Vakulenko

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Beyond Oil: Hormuz Closure Puts Russia in the Lead in the Fertilizer Market

    The Kremlin expects to not only profit from rising fertilizer prices but also exact revenge for the collapse of the 2023 grain deal.

      Alexandra Prokopenko

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    “Mr. Nobody Against Putin”: A Deep Dive Into Russian Propaganda

    Talankin and Borenstein’s documentary is a unique inside look at a regime that threatens the world and has killed thousands of people in its neighboring country. And many critics and general viewers alike draw parallels between the Putin regime and their own governments.

      Ekaterina Barabash

  • Trump and Netanyahu speaking
    Commentary
    Emissary
    The Diverging U.S. and Israeli Goals in Iran Are Making the Endgame Even Murkier

    The cracks between Trump and Netanyahu have become more pronounced, particularly over energy and leadership targets.

      • Eric Lob

      Eric Lob

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Carnegie global logo, stacked
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NWWashington, DC, 20036-2103Phone: 202 483 7600Fax: 202 483 1840
  • Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
  • Donate
  • Programs
  • Events
  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Contact
  • Annual Reports
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Government Resources
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.