• Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Global logoCarnegie lettermark logo
DemocracyIran
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Konstantin Skorkin"
  ],
  "type": "commentary",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "Russia",
    "Eastern Europe",
    "Ukraine"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Economy"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

Commentary
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center

All Change: Donbas Republics Get New Russian Business Boss

The self-proclaimed Donetsk and Luhansk republics are moving on from the wild days of economic piracy to more orderly exploitation schemes. The prospects of reintegrating the region under the Minsk accords are growing more illusory.

Link Copied
By Konstantin Skorkin
Published on Jun 29, 2021

Diplomacy in Ukraine’s war-torn Donbas may be at a standstill, but momentous changes are taking place in the region’s economy. Key enterprises in the Donetsk and Luhansk self-proclaimed republics had for the last four years been under the de facto control of Sergei Kurchenko, once an oligarch from the inner circle of former Ukrainian president Viktor Yanukovych. Now he has been forced to cede that role to a Russian businessman with no prior ties to the Donbas. The Kremlin understands that the breakaway regions are set to remain on its balance sheet for a long time, so it is looking for the most efficient ways to manage the region, ousting odious figures engendered by the 2014 Ukraine crisis.

When the Donetsk and Luhansk regions declared their independence from Ukraine, a number of assets belonging to Ukrainian oligarch Rinat Akhmetov were left on their territory. For a time, they continued to operate as usual, despite the hostilities, remaining a source of jobs for local residents and taxes for the Ukrainian budget. Back then, the preservation of economic ties between Ukraine and its breakaway provinces was seen as an important component of their subsequent reintegration under the Minsk accords.

However, as the conflict dragged on, the economic ties began to disintegrate. In 2017, under pressure from the nationalists, Kyiv declared an economic blockade of Donetsk and Luhansk. The separatists responded by “nationalizing” Akhmetov’s enterprises, and later transferring some of those assets under the management of Vneshtorgservice, a company registered in another breakaway republic: South Ossetia.

Sergei Kurchenko Source: ПроФутбол Digital / YouTube.comThe ultimate beneficiary of Vneshtorgservice was said to be Kurchenko, who had fled to the Donbas region after Yanukovych’s ouster. Many members of the former president’s entourage viewed the region as a possible launching pad for a return to Ukrainian politics. Kurchenko’s initial attempt to put down roots in Donbas failed: in 2015, he was declared persona non grata for his role in interruptions in fuel deliveries to the region. However, eventually—and not without support from his benefactors in Moscow—Kurchenko and his representatives gained control over some of Akhmetov’s valuable assets, and became the unofficial bosses of the local economy. Vneshtorgservice alumni have since also entered regional ministries and legislative assemblies.  

Yet those new bosses showed little regard for the long-term interests of the Donbas economy, bleeding enterprises dry and causing delays in salary payments, increased social tensions, and strikes. At first, the local authorities cracked down on protests to protect Kurchenko’s interests, but when the participants of a strike at the Alchevsk metallurgical plant reached out for help to the Kremlin, that was the last straw.

In late 2020–early 2021, it became clear that Kurchenko’s reign in the Donbas was coming to an end. The regional authorities began “renationalizing” some of his assets and transferring them to local businessmen.

Then, in mid-June 2021, Luhansk and Donetsk officials announced that Vneshtorgservice enterprises had a new investor: Russian businessman and experienced executive Yevgeny Yurchenko. He has already promised to pay off all salary arrears before the end of the year, but considering the troubled state of Donbas industry, he is unlikely to have the resources to make serious investments in the region. Kurchenko also began by paying off debts and promising to find sales markets, but he ultimately did not live up to the hopes of the Kremlin.

The new investor will also be unable to radically change the situation. Donbas will remain a gray zone, which prevents its enterprises from joining the global market, where the metallurgy sector is doing well. It’s more likely that Kurchenko’s makeshift setup will be replaced with something more stable and more rational.  

Major Russian business considers Donbas assets too risky due to the threat of sanctions. Yurchenko may therefore become an intermediary for the injection of Russian budget funds into the Donbas economy. The Russian authorities may also find other ways of providing indirect assistance. The Ukrainian economist Alexei Kushch has asserted that there is a transition under way in the Donetsk and Luhansk economy to a model where “representatives of Russian financial-industrial groups are simply informed that they and their companies are now responsible for developing certain enterprises” in the breakaway regions.

Indefinite as Yurchenko’s plans may be, it is already clear that the introduction of a new investor strengthens Russian control over the economies of Donetsk and Luhansk, previously Kurchenko’s fiefdom. If anything, this is good news for local enterprises, which are receiving some basic guarantees. We may also see some representatives of the new management ascend to the region’s political elites.

The changes have already elicited a strong response from the local opposition, which views the appearance of a new investor as a clumsy attempt to placate mass discontent, and suspects Yurchenko of having ties to Viktor Medvedchuk, a Ukrainian politician believed to be close to Russian President Vladimir Putin.

For now, it’s difficult to say whether Medvedchuk is really linked with the new economic bosses of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions. Since he is currently in Kyiv under house arrest—and sanctions—he is unlikely to want to advertise such connections. At the same time, audio surveillance recordings published in Ukrainian media indicate that Medvedchuk has been in close contact with the elites of the breakaway regions and their Russian overseers since 2014, and his business is integrated into the local economy. It would not be surprising, therefore, if his influence in the Donbas increased.

Kurchenko’s departure from the Donbas is also a signal that the Donetsk and Luhansk regions are moving on from the wild days of economic piracy to more orderly exploitation schemes. The prospects of reintegrating the region under the Minsk accords are growing more illusory.

Donetsk and Luhansk are becoming another protectorate of Moscow, and the status quo may be preserved for decades to come. The Kremlin now needs to optimize its control over the territories, and it is hoping to do so using Russian-appointed executives who could become intermediaries between the Donetsk and Luhansk authorities, the Kremlin, and big business in order to create a paternalist showcase of the “Russian Donbas.” 

About the Author

Konstantin Skorkin

An independent journalist.

Konstantin Skorkin

An independent journalist.

Konstantin Skorkin
EconomyRussiaEastern EuropeUkraine

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Time to Merge the Commission and EEAS

    The EU is structurally incapable of reacting to today’s foreign policy crises. The union must fold the EEAS into the European Commission and create a security council better prepared to take action on the global stage.

      Stefan Lehne

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    What the Russian Energy Sector Stands to Gain From War in the Middle East

    The future trajectory of the U.S.-Iran war remains uncertain, but its impact on global energy trade flows and ties will be far-reaching. Moscow is likely to become a key beneficiary of these changes; the crisis in the Gulf also strengthens Russia’s hand in its relationships with China and India, where advantages might prove more durable.

      • Sergey Vakulenko

      Sergey Vakulenko

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Beyond Oil: Hormuz Closure Puts Russia in the Lead in the Fertilizer Market

    The Kremlin expects to not only profit from rising fertilizer prices but also exact revenge for the collapse of the 2023 grain deal.

      Alexandra Prokopenko

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    “Mr. Nobody Against Putin”: A Deep Dive Into Russian Propaganda

    Talankin and Borenstein’s documentary is a unique inside look at a regime that threatens the world and has killed thousands of people in its neighboring country. And many critics and general viewers alike draw parallels between the Putin regime and their own governments.

      Ekaterina Barabash

  • Trump and Netanyahu speaking
    Commentary
    Emissary
    The Diverging U.S. and Israeli Goals in Iran Are Making the Endgame Even Murkier

    The cracks between Trump and Netanyahu have become more pronounced, particularly over energy and leadership targets.

      • Eric Lob

      Eric Lob

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Carnegie global logo, stacked
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NWWashington, DC, 20036-2103Phone: 202 483 7600Fax: 202 483 1840
  • Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
  • Donate
  • Programs
  • Events
  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Contact
  • Annual Reports
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Government Resources
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.