This chapter examines the logic of nuclear weapons abolitionism, surveys the contemporary nuclear developments in Asia that are described in this volume, and highlights implications for the U.S. and its ambitions regarding comprehensive nuclear disarmament.
Main Argument
Although the emergence of new nuclear powers in the post–Cold War era has triggered fears of widespread nuclear proliferation and renewed calls for nuclear abolition, the pursuit and development of nuclear weapons in Asia are likely to only increase in the years ahead. Continuing interstate competition, along with the expectations of many states that nuclear weapons will enhance their security and offer deterrence value, ensures that regional arsenals will grow. The U.S., therefore, must prepare for a reality that is quite different from the vision offered by nuclear abolitionism: an Asia that hosts many nuclear powers whose arsenals vary in capacity, architecture, and doctrine.
Policy Implications
- Preserving stable deterrence even as the U.S. protects its primacy is the critical obligation facing Washington in the second nuclear age. The U.S. must maintain its deterrent capabilities, which function as the fundamental “backstop” on which the nation’s security, the protection of U.S. allies, and the durability of the global order ultimately depend.
- Washington should carefully consider the quantitative requirements of nuclear sufficiency and extended deterrence. The process of nuclear reductions may be reaching—if it has not already reached—the limits of its success.
- The consequences of forfeiting U.S. nuclear superiority vis-à-vis China for the viability of extended deterrence in Asia require careful consideration.
- Despite budgetary challenges, the U.S. must ensure that its nuclear weaponry, force triad, and production complex, including the necessary human capital, do not diminish in capability.
This chapter is the introduction to Strategic Asia 2013-14: Asia in the Second Nuclear Age. Read more about Strategic Asia, including information on how to order the complete book, here.
Comments(3)
Nuclear Arms are needed for defence of 3rd world countries. The five nucleare Armed Countries should dis mental their Arms to the minimum what 3rd world has in their arsenal, there after the five nuclear countries should takble the dis arma ment issue before the world to completly distroy the nuclear arms. ::::::::: A sure situation will come tht all the five nuclear armed countries will talk like small time smallest countries on the earth. They will have no power to bargain with any country even smallest of the groups. The Terrorists will vanish from the earth, say surface of the earth, because, every country knows who creates terrorists and who feds them with Arms on thes earth. :::::::: so the saying goes, they do not wish to un cloth them selves but they wish to undress others
If we want to win with nuclear weapon we have to know how we can stop its distruction
No one needs nuclear arms to protect themselves or others; they are like showing others how good your look, like the way the elephant displays his tusks. Developing technology has changed the way wars are run today. No sane government is going to use nuclear arms in a war. The fear comes if terrorists get to them, then what?
Comment Policy
Comments that include profanity, personal attacks, or other inappropriate material will be removed. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, steps will be taken to block users who violate any of the posting standards, terms of use, privacy policies, or any other policies governing this site. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.