This could have been Michael Bloomberg's night. But instead it was his nightmare. Viewers were anxious for a first look at the billionaire former mayor of New York. And to meet or exceed them, Bloomberg had to do three things. Sadly for him, he failed at all three.
First, he had to establish a stage presence. But throughout the debate, Bloomberg seemed disengaged and withdrawn -- uncomfortable and emotionless. His performance improved a bit later during the debate. But for the most part, he seemed unable to project a vibrant persona, let alone charisma. And for a tough businessman, he seemed strangely hesitant, reserved and poorly equipped to push back hard on his opponents' charges of sexism, racism and capitalism.
Second, he failed to make the case for electability Bloomberg seemed to make little of his potentially strongest talking point -- his capacity to beat President Donald Trump. This should have been his single most effective narrative, and he should have turned at least part of every question to that end. In the end, he remained a cardboard figure seemingly unable to outline what he actually stands for.
Third, he could not defend his most controversial policies. On stop and frisk, Bloomberg didn't offer anything remotely resembling a sincere apology as much as an explanation for why it didn't work. But the real damage which may well prove fatal to Bloomberg's campaign was his response to Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren's question: would he free women who had settled harassment or discrimination suits from their non-disclosure agreements so their accounts might be heard? Bloomberg refused, stumbled and fumbled trying to lawyer his way out of the dead-end in which he was stuck.
Comments(1)
The Democratic Party can't possibly win without Sanders' millions; yet, the Dems also seem doomed with a self-proclaimed socialist at the top of the ticket. Bloomberg -- the billionaire -- is certainly not the answer. And because the party seems so hopelessly split; it is doubtful any candidate can bring its two highly separate wings together. But it was the very last question of the debate that was the most telling. When asked by Chuck Todd if in order to avoid a "brokered convention" the candidate with the most delegates -- but not the majority of delegates -- should become the Democratic Party nominee, only Bernie Sanders answered in the affirmative. Obviously the Vermont Senator doesn't want a second convention ballot to come into play; whereupon 500 superdelegates (party insiders, the establishment) would shift its support toward a moderate (but who?). In other words, for the Dems, Milwaukee 2020 could become a replay of the chaos of 1968; or with the socialist Sanders as its nominee, November 3, 2020 could very easily become a debacle equal to George McGovern 1972.
Comment Policy
Comments that include profanity, personal attacks, or other inappropriate material will be removed. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, steps will be taken to block users who violate any of the posting standards, terms of use, privacy policies, or any other policies governing this site. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.