Summary: To the extent NATO’s new Strategic Concept mentions commitments at all, they are couched in elastic language devoid of benchmarks specifying what members will do, how much they will spend to do it, and when. In short, the Strategic Concept is neither a strategy nor a concept but rather stirring verbiage about NATO’s future aspirations.
Sign up for a weekly newsletter from the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Sign up to receive emails from Carnegie’s Russia and Eurasia Program!
Check your email for details on your request.
End of document
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
In a complex, changing, and increasingly contested world, the Carnegie Endowment generates strategic ideas and independent analysis, supports diplomacy, and trains the next generation of international scholar-practitioners to help countries and institutions take on the most difficult global problems and safeguard peace.