• Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Global logoCarnegie lettermark logo
Democracy
  • Donate
REQUIRED IMAGE

REQUIRED IMAGE

Article

The Roots of Terrorism

The Bush administration believes that a regime change in Iraq will revive the Israeli-Palestinian peace process. In his speech at the American Enterprise Institute, George W. Bush argued that toppling Saddam Hussein will deprive Palestinian suicide bombers of a wealthy patron, which will alleviate the threat of terrorism in Israel and allow for the rise of a democratic Palestinian government that strives for peace. The president promises "to seize every opportunity in pursuit of peace. And the end of the present regime in Iraq would create such an opportunity." He would be wise to start now.

Link Copied
Published on Apr 1, 2003
Program mobile hero image

Program

Nuclear Policy

The Nuclear Policy Program aims to reduce the risk of nuclear war. Our experts diagnose acute risks stemming from technical and geopolitical developments, generate pragmatic solutions, and use our global network to advance risk-reduction policies. Our work covers deterrence, disarmament, arms control, nonproliferation, and nuclear energy.

Learn More

The Bush administration believes that a regime change in Iraq will revive the Israeli-Palestinian peace process. In his speech at the American Enterprise Institute, George W. Bush argued that toppling Saddam Hussein will deprive Palestinian suicide bombers of a wealthy patron, which will alleviate the threat of terrorism in Israel and allow for the rise of a democratic Palestinian government that strives for peace. The president promises "to seize every opportunity in pursuit of peace. And the end of the present regime in Iraq would create such an opportunity." He would be wise to start now.

Terrorist attacks in Israel neither exist because of financial rewards for the attackers' families nor are they solely the product of undemocratic regimes. A suicide bomber does not kill dozens of Israelis and himself because it is a lucrative business, but rather because he or she sees it as resisting a colonial occupation. Nothing can justify the slaughter of innocent civilians, but if we truly want an end to terrorism, we have to trace the roots of the problem. Palestinians have been living under an often oppressive Israeli occupation for decades, and they yearn for independence. A ten-year old child does not throw rocks at Israeli soldiers because he lacks a democratic government but because he suffers from daily humiliation. When the peace process was showing positive signs of progress at the time of Rabin there was not one terrorist attack for a period of two years because the people started to feel the progress. The Palestinian public at the time did not condone such horrible crimes. Today, with Israel's re-occupation of Palestinian territories and heightened attacks on Palestinian civilians and homes, the people have lost hope and have no incentive to oppose terrorism. The results are clear in the Israeli and Palestinian body counts.

Invading Iraq may hinder some terrorist activities, but it will not eliminate the reason they exist, nor the primary sources of terrorist funding, which come from Iran, Syria and Saudi Arabia, not Iraq. The Palestinian popular uprising will not disappear, and the proof is in the first Intifadah when all they had was rocks. Moreover, the continuation of the occupation and settlement expansion will only lead to the rise of more angry terrorist cells. "An American invasion of Iraq is already being used as a recruitment tool by Al Qaeda and other groups," a senior American counterintelligence official told the New York Times on March 16, 2003. "And it is a very effective tool." This statement was confirmed by the latest suicide attack in Israel, which Islamic Jihad declared as a "gift" to the people of Iraq. Even if Palestinians finally get the democratic government they have long pursued, for them it is an issue separate and unrelated to the Israeli occupation. Many Palestinians consider the recent appointment of a Palestinian prime minister as irrelevant to the peace process.

President Bush has now conditioned Israeli withdrawal from Palestinian territories and the end of settlement expansion on the end of suicide attacks and on a democratic Palestinian government. But the attacks will not stop as long as the Palestinians are denied even their basic rights and remain without hope for peace. To save the Israeli civilians from the daily horrors of riding the bus, the Bush Administration must apply pressure to both sides. This means convincing Israel to lift the curfews, end the occupation and terminate the expansion of its settlements in lands it does not own. Terrorism should not be tolerated anywhere in the world, but to fight it we must deal with the cause, not the symptoms.

Tamer Nagy Mahmoud is a Junior Fellow at the Carnegie Endowment. He has been a member of the Seeds of Peace program, a Middle East peace co-existence program for Arab and Israeli youth, since 1993.

Full Disclosure: Project Director Joseph Cirincione has family in Netanya, Israel. They had lunch on Saturday at the restaurant that was bombed on Sunday.

Iraq

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

  • Commentary
    Diwan
    The Hezbollah Disarmament Debate Hits Iraq

    Beirut and Baghdad are both watching how the other seeks to give the state a monopoly of weapons. 

      Hasan Hamra

  • Commentary
    Sada
    A House Divided: How Internal Power Struggles Shape Iraq’s Foreign Policy

    Iraq’s foreign policy is being shaped by its own internal battles—fractured elites, competing militias, and a state struggling to speak with one voice. The article asks: How do these divisions affect Iraq’s ability to balance between the U.S. and Iran? Can Baghdad use its “good neighbor” approach to reduce regional tensions? And what will it take for Iraq to turn regional investments into real stability at home? It explores potential solutions, including strengthening state institutions, curbing rogue militias, improving governance, and using regional partnerships to address core economic and security weaknesses so Iraq can finally build a unified and sustainable foreign policy.

      Mike Fleet

  • Commentary
    Diwan
    System Maintenance in Iraq

    In an interview, Shahla al-Kli discusses the country’s parliamentary elections and what they reveal.

      Rayyan Al-Shawaf

  • Commentary
    Diwan
    Toward a New Compromise in Iraq?

    Recent election results have placed Nouri al-Maliki in a strong position to name the next prime minister.

      Wladimir van Wilgenburg

  • Commentary
    Diwan
    Israel’s Ring of Buffer Zones

    In the aftermath of the October 7 attacks, the Israelis have transformed their neighbors’ borderlands to serve their own security interests. 

      Armenak Tokmajyan

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Carnegie global logo, stacked
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NWWashington, DC, 20036-2103Phone: 202 483 7600Fax: 202 483 1840
  • Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
  • Donate
  • Programs
  • Events
  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Contact
  • Annual Reports
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Government Resources
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.