• Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Global logoCarnegie lettermark logo
DemocracyIran
  • Donate
REQUIRED IMAGE

REQUIRED IMAGE

Article

European Backlash


Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s demagoguery has triggered a strong European backlash that may produce the Western unity long lacking in negotiations with Iran.  European leaders have denounced Ahmadinejad’s screeds against Israel and his denial of the Holocaust, linked them to deep suspicions of Iran’s nuclear program and begun talk of sanctions and other actions to force Iranian compliance with its treaty obligations. Ahmadinejad’s radical statements did not start EU-US collaboration, but will strengthen their partnership in support of Security Council referral. 

 

EU-Iranian negotiations, set to begin December 21, will be the first time since August of this year that the EU (led by Britain, France and Germany) will hold direct talks with the Iranians.  On August 5, the Europeans gave Iran a “Framework for a Long-term Agreement,” but negotiations stalled 3 days later when Iran restarted its uranium conversion program at Isfahan.(Read More)


Link Copied
By Jill Marie Parillo
Published on Dec 20, 2005
Program mobile hero image

Program

Nuclear Policy

The Nuclear Policy Program aims to reduce the risk of nuclear war. Our experts diagnose acute risks stemming from technical and geopolitical developments, generate pragmatic solutions, and use our global network to advance risk-reduction policies. Our work covers deterrence, disarmament, arms control, nonproliferation, and nuclear energy.

Learn More

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s demagoguery has triggered a strong European backlash that may produce the Western unity long lacking in negotiations with Iran.  European leaders have denounced Ahmadinejad’s screeds against Israel and his denial of the Holocaust, linked them to deep suspicions of Iran’s nuclear program and begun talk of sanctions and other actions to force Iranian compliance with its treaty obligations. Ahmadinejad’s radical statements did not start EU-US collaboration, but will strengthen their partnership in support of Security Council referral. 

 

EU-Iranian negotiations, set to begin December 21, will be the first time since August of this year that the EU (led by Britain, France and Germany) will hold direct talks with the Iranians.  On August 5, the Europeans gave Iran a “Framework for a Long-term Agreement,” but negotiations stalled 3 days later when Iran restarted its uranium conversion program at Isfahan. 

 

In the past few weeks:

• UK Prime Minister Tony Blair called “unacceptable” Iran’s “attitude towards Israel, their attitude towards terrorism, and their attitude on the nuclear weapons issue.”  Blair said the British are now going to start to ask, “when are you going to do something about this? Because you imagine a state like that, with an attitude like that, having a nuclear weapon?”

 

• President Jacques Chirac said he “was profoundly shocked by the statements of the Iranian President, which are totally senseless and irresponsible. The Iranian President is taking the risk of his country being made an outlaw state."

 

• The European Council (made up of heads of state of all European Union governments and the President of the European Commission) condemned “in the strongest terms the comments in respect to the State of Israel made by President Ahmadinejad.”

 

• The German Chancellor’s Chief of Staff Thomas de Maizière said the German government intends to explore “measures (against Iran) at the United Nations level.”  According to Der Spiegel, the question is not if Germany should sanction Iran, but what type of sanctions would work. “After all, anything other than an oil embargo would likely be ineffective.”

 

• Pascal Boniface, a leading French expert, sometimes called the voice of the French government, claimed Ahmadinejad’s “kill Israel” remarks are confirmation of our worst fears in respect to Iran’s nuclear intentions, “wiped off the map has a correlation with nuclear attack,” he said.

 

European Union representatives have not gone so far as to abandon negotiations.  Benita Ferrero-Waldner, EU Commissioner for External Relations condemned Ahmadinejad’s remarks in her speech to the European parliament but noted, “on the nuclear track, we still believe that engagement is far preferable to brinkmanship, confrontation and isolation.”  The EU Council’s November conclusion on the issue stressed “the EU's continued support for a diplomatic solution to international concerns over Iran's nuclear programme.”

 

Although the EU is open to negotiate with the Iranians, after Ahmadinejad’s remarks they want to make a threat of referral to the UN Security Council more credible.  Der Spiegel quoted German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier during an official visit to Washington, November 29, as saying that now "we need a credible threat" against Iran.  On Friday, December 16, after Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice met in Paris with top French officials, Foreign Affairs Minster Douste-Blazy said similarly that “we must make the Security Council option credible."

 

Now, the EU will make this threat to Iran more credible by formally joining forces with the US. The EU and the US have already made separate statements to the IAEA Board of Governors in September that supported sending Iran’s “noncompliance to the U.N. Security Council.”  The next step will be EU-US joint statements. 

 

The European-Iranian negotiations will begin under an ominous cloud.  Unless Iran changes course, it now seems that the Western governments will move sooner rather than later to coordinate a common position on sanctions and referral to the Security Council.

About the Author

Jill Marie Parillo

Jill Marie Parillo
Middle EastIranUnited KingdomNuclear PolicyNuclear Energy

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

  • Commentary
    Diwan
    Israel’s Forever Wars

    The country’s strategy is no longer focused on deterrence and diplomacy, it’s about dominance and degradation.

      Nathan J. Brown

  • City at night
    Commentary
    Emissary
    The Iran War Is Also Now a Semiconductor Problem

    The conflict is exposing the deep energy vulnerabilities of Korea’s chip industry.

      Darcie Draudt-Véjares, Tim Sahay

  • One man tossing a sack to another to stack on a truck
    Commentary
    Emissary
    The Other Global Crisis Stemming From the Strait of Hormuz’s Blockage

    Even if the Iran war stops, restarting production and transport for fertilizers and their components could take weeks—at a crucial moment for planting.

      • Noah  Gordon ​​​​

      Noah Gordon, Lucy Corthell

  • Commentary
    Diwan
    Shockwaves Across the Gulf

    The countries in the region are managing the fallout from Iranian strikes in a paradoxical way.

      • Angie Omar

      Angie Omar

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Taking the Pulse: Is France’s New Nuclear Doctrine Ambitious Enough?

    French President Emmanuel Macron has unveiled his country’s new nuclear doctrine. Are the changes he has made enough to reassure France’s European partners in the current geopolitical context?

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz, ed.

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Carnegie global logo, stacked
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NWWashington, DC, 20036-2103Phone: 202 483 7600Fax: 202 483 1840
  • Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
  • Donate
  • Programs
  • Events
  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Contact
  • Annual Reports
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Government Resources
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.