Alexey Malashenko
Source: Getty
Chechen Murders Put Kadyrov In the Hot Seat
Questions remain whether Chechen President Ramzan Kadyrov ordered the recent murders of human rights activists in Chechnya, or whether the crimes were an attempt by his opponents to discredit his leadership.

Some claim that Chechen president Ramzan Kadyrov gave the order to assassinate Natalya Estimirova, Zarema Sadulaeva and her husband, Alik Djabrailov. Relations between the Chechen leader and NGOs are not friendly, and investigations of murders, kidnappings, torture and other human rights violations irritate Mr. Kadyrov. Kadyrov’s reaction to his critics is generally negative, and he has shown a preference to be rid of such investigators.
Nevertheless, it is difficult to argue that Kadyrov is interested in killing his opponents, and in some ways, he has even attempted to improve his public image. He has invited the leader of Chechen emigration, Ahmed Zakaev, to return to Russia, and offered him the post of Minister of Culture. Kadyrov has also pursued an all-Chechen congress, and expressed an increasing desire to talk to the liberal mass media. Thus, Kadyrov appears to want to show that he is no longer a “cruel Caucasian barbarian.”
Yet Kadyrov also senses the Kremlin’s disappointment in his leadership. The federal center no longer trusts in his absolute ability to control the situation in the republic. Russian president Dmitry Medvedev considers the assassination of the three human right activists a sign of Kadyrov’s weakness. Moscow is also unhappy with Kadyrov’s growing ambitions. In addition to trying his best to remove federal supervisory structures, he constantly claims Chechnya is a “special subject” of the Russian Federation and demands increasing plenary powers.
But if Kadyrov is not responsible for the murders, who could have organized them? There are some possible options.
Maybe they were carried out by forces in Chechnya who want to compromise Kadyrov in the eyes of Moscow, and thereby signal that in time the Center will be obliged to replace him. The tragedy could perhaps also be the work of the wahhabi Islamist opposition, who also use every possible chance to show Kadyrov is not in control -- though that is less likely. One cannot ignore the fact that in Moscow itself, there are those who would like to compromise the Chechen president.
In any event, Kadyrov is obliged to explain his innocence, a responsibility he has never much liked.
About the Author
Former Scholar in Residence, Religion, Society, and Security Program
Malashenko is a former chair of the Carnegie Moscow Center’s Religion, Society, and Security Program.
- What Will Uzbekistan’s New President Do?Commentary
- Preserving the Calm in Russia’s Muslim CommunityCommentary
Alexey Malashenko
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
- Price Analysis Shows China Holds Upper Hand in Russia Gas Supply TalksCommentary
A leak of Russian gas price data helps establish that China is paying Russia far less than Central Asian countries and Gazprom’s former European customers.
Sergey Vakulenko
- The Spring and Autumn of Chinese PoliticsCommentary
China’s political future will be shaped between now and next October. As the Communist Party enters its intense “campaign season” to prepare for a major political transition in 2027, reading Beijing's actions and responses may become more difficult as domestic politics weigh on its behavior more than usual.
Damien Ma
- Europe Needs its own Sanctions-Enforcement MuscleCommentary
The EU can impose sanctions but struggles to enforce them without the United States. With Washington increasingly disinterested in backing European interests, the bloc must now fend for itself.
Nicu Popescu, Tiago Antunes
- Why Has Tokyo’s Response to Kremlin Challenges Been So Muted?Commentary
Japan’s long-term security policy is driven by concerns about China, and there is little appetite for (or interest in) pursuing a confrontation with Moscow.
James D.J. Brown
- Containing Escalation in the Black SeaCommentary
Russia is testing the waters of NATO’s mutual defense clause. What do strikes in Romanian territorial waters mean for the alliance’s posture toward Moscow?
Dimitar Bechev