Deborah Gordon, Stephen D. Ziman
Source: Getty
Transportation Trifecta: Cars, Climate Change, and Oil Security
The transformation of America's cars—and trucks—presents a unique opportunity to cut oil use and mitigate climate change without requiring economy-wide action, at least not in the near term.
President Obama got it right—the failure of last year’s climate bill does not mean the death of climate policy. Good things often come in threes and finding breakthroughs that transform vehicles will mitigate climate change, reduce air pollution, and cut oil dependency, all at once.
Cars, not coal, need to be the priority in addressing climate change. That’s not to say coal—with its inherent environmental, health, and safety risks—is off the hook. It’s just not on the front burner.
Scientists now realize that air pollution and climate change must be treated as related challenges, not two distinct problems. The United Nations Environment Programme recently released new research that pins the short-term cause of growing climate disruption on ground-level ozone and black carbon, both of which result largely from oil-fueled vehicle engines. NASA’s climatologists separately concluded that cutting on-road transportation emissions of ozone-forming gases and black carbon would be unequivocally good over the short and long term—for both the climate and public health. This offers an environmental trifecta that is win-win-win.
We don’t need to look any farther than our own garages to see where the largest shares of climate disruption, smog, and oil use are coming from. Cars and trucks are 94 percent dependent on oil that, when burned, emit high levels of direct and indirect warming gases.
Cars are causing the climate to change before our eyes. The current decade is the warmest on record worldwide. The floods, fires, melting ice caps, feverish heat, and onslaught of winter blizzards witnessed in 2010 are signs of troubling climate change already underway. And, despite climate skeptics who doubt the cause and effect of a warming planet and frigid weather, polls show that the vast majority of Americans—three in four—continue to trust the scientists who say that global warming is real.
And as if climate concerns weren’t enough to combat, the democracy-seeking unrest brewing in Libya, Iran, and other oil-rich nations is stirring America’s energy fears. Fortunately for policymakers, it turns out that the two major concerns over climate and oil are related. They both have cars in common and two billion motor vehicles are forecasted to proliferate around the globe within this decade.
Cars—and trucks—present a unique opportunity to solve two vexing problems at once. Cutting oil use and mitigating climate change does not require economy-wide action, at least not in the near term, because the solution lies mostly with on-road transportation.
The key is to transform motor vehicles, cleaning up current ones and electrifying those that are yet to be built. These goals work in tandem. Electrification not only eliminates the tailpipe’s airborne, noxious, climate-forcing pollutants, it also requires a far more energy-efficient vehicle design. So along the road to plugging in, we can also commercialize conventional cars that burn 50 percent less oil and reinvent mobility, from cars to trucks and beyond. Using less oil means relying less on crude from unstable oil nations which is an energy coup these days.
Model simulations run by NASA scientists indicate that huge reductions in climate forcing from electrified transportation may be possible, making this technological shift an extremely worthwhile pursuit. The potential to improve the climate, alleviate local pollution, and wean cars off oil justifies increasing investments in battery and advanced vehicle research. This is exactly what the president is proposing by significantly boosting funds for the very agency—the Department of Energy—that was created in the midst of back-to-back oil crises in 1977.
If we stay on our current path, the climate problems attributed to our cars and trucks will continue to heat up and ample, affordable oil supplies to fuel America’s gas-guzzling fleet may no longer be guaranteed. This perfect storm has been a long time coming. The cars of the 2010s must innovate far beyond those that rolled off the first assembly line a century ago, simultaneously mitigating global warming, slashing air pollution, and seriously cutting oil consumption.
This is an all-or-nothing proposition. Now that we have a clear target, the real mission begins. Gentlemen, start your…motors.
About the Author
Former Director and Senior Fellow, Energy and Climate Program
Gordon was director of Carnegie’s Energy and Climate Program, where her research focuses on oil and climate change issues in North America and globally.
- Petroleum Companies Need a Credible Climate PlanArticle
- Advancing Public Climate Engineering DisclosureArticle
Deborah Gordon, Smriti Kumble, David Livingston
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
- The Iran War’s Global ReachCollection
As the war between the United States, Israel, and Iran continues, Carnegie scholars contribute cutting-edge analysis on the events of the war and their wide-reaching implications. From the impact on Iran and its immediate neighbors to the responses from Gulf states to fuel and fertilizer shortages caused by the effective shutdown of the Strait of Hormuz, the war is reshaping Middle East alliances and creating shockwaves around the world. Carnegie experts analyze it all.
- Taking the Pulse: Can NATO Survive the Iran War?Commentary
Donald Trump has repeatedly bashed NATO and European allies, threatening to annex Canada and Greenland and deploring their lack of enthusiasm for his war of choice in Iran. Is this latest round of abuse the final straw?
Rym Momtaz, ed.
- The Impact of Ending U.S. International Media AssistancePaper
The future looks bleak for independent media worldwide, but there is a robust infrastructure of knowledge, organizations, and people to build upon.
Daniel Sabet, Susan Abbott
- “It’s Not Like Turning a Switch On and Off”Commentary
Why the Iran ceasefire isn’t a quick fix to the Strait of Hormuz energy crisis.
Helima Croft, Aaron David Miller
- The United States and Iran Have Agreed to a Two-Week CeasefireCommentary
Spot analysis from Carnegie scholars on events relating to the Middle East and North Africa.
Michael Young