• Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Global logoCarnegie lettermark logo
DemocracyIran
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Moisés Naím"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "East Asia",
    "China",
    "Western Europe"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Political Reform",
    "Civil Society",
    "Religion"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media

What Pope Francis and Xi Jinping Have in Common

The Catholic and Chinese leaders face the same question: How to lead a billion people in today’s world?

Link Copied
By Moisés Naím
Published on Oct 1, 2015

Source: Atlantic

Pope Francis and Chinese President Xi Jinping are, in many ways, worlds apart. One is the spiritual leader of 1.2 billion Catholics (over 40 percent of whom reside in Latin America) and the other presides over 1.4 billion Chinese. Pope Francis is a religious leader and Xi Jinping is a political one.

But what distinguishes one from the other is far more complex than religion and politics. When Pope Francis visited Cuba earlier this month and ignored dissidents opposed to the Castro regime, he made a blatantly political decision. When the pontiff urged members of the U.S. Congress to change their attitude about immigration, economic inequality, and climate change, he also acted like a political leader. Likewise, when Xi Jinping, who just concluded a less-publicized visit to the United States as well, urges his people to pursue the “Chinese Dream” or to behave according to “Chinese values,” he is trying to add some spiritual hue to his politics and leadership.

In fact, the similarities between the two leaders are as instructive as the differences. Both are in charge of immense societies with ancient cultures that are struggling to respond to modern challenges, from changing mores regarding reproductive rights to the use of social media. Both are confronting these contemporary realities at a time when the traditional responses of their respective institutions—authority, infallibility, secrecy—have lost effectiveness. And perhaps most surprisingly, both are tackling these challenges in similar ways. Here are just three examples.

1. Taming powerful bureaucracies

In China, Xi Jinping is seeking to reform the Communist Party machinery. In the Vatican, Pope Francis is striving to do the same with the curia—the bureaucracy that runs the Roman Catholic Church and has enormous influence in shaping Catholicism. These efforts pit both leaders against groups and individuals whose beliefs, commitment to traditions, and desire to retain power or defend vested interests create enormous obstacles to change.

Among other things, the pope has denounced the curia’s members for feeling “immortal, immune, and indispensable”; suffering from “mental and spiritual petrification,” “spiritual Alzheimer’s,” and “existential schizophrenia”; indulging in gossip and slander; and being overly concerned with hierarchies and indifferent to anyone but themselves.

Xi is similarly harsh in his criticism of the sluggishness and dysfunction that plague Chinese bureaucrats, who he claims are more concerned with lining their pockets—and those of their family and friends—than serving the nation.

2. Taming official corruption and materialism

Both leaders have chosen to make the fight against corruption one of their signature initiatives.

Francis is trying to clean up the corrupt Vatican Bank and continuing to confront sexual-abuse scandals involving Catholic priests. In 2013, he sent a strong message by suspending a German bishop known for his opulent lifestyle. Among the “sicknesses” that plague the curia, Francis includes the accumulation of “material goods” and the search for “worldly profit and showing off.”

Xi has arguably been even more aggressive in his campaign against venality: More than 414,000 Communist Party officials have been disciplined for corruption and another 200,000-plus have been prosecuted for the offense. Several have been executed, and the Chinese government is actively seeking to repatriate hundreds of Chinese public servants who have fled the country to avoid charges.

3. Taming fragmentation and schismatic pressures

The Catholic Church and the Chinese government are each attempting to bridge deep and consequential internal divisions borne of several factors, including economic and social transformations, the impact of disruptive technologies, and a revolution of expectations and aspirations among a better-informed and more politically active and empowered populace.

The Vatican, for instance, is currently contending with fierce global competition among Christian denominations to retain and attract souls. In Latin America, the share of Catholics has declined by 23 percentage points since 1970; in the United States, for every new Catholic six abandon the Church. Many join evangelical Protestant churches.

China may be an efficient police state adroit at silencing critics, but the government still faces frequent street protests and calls to reform the Chinese model of governance. Defending the model was easier when the Chinese economy was consistently growing at a rapid pace, generating jobs, increasing workers’ incomes, and pulling millions out of poverty. But when such economic growth ceases to be a certainty—much as is happening now—the social compact that has allowed the Communist Party to rule without much opposition will begin to erode.

In other words, Pope Francis and Xi Jinping are both engaged in monumental efforts to adapt to modern dynamics without losing the very legitimacy that enables both leaders to preside over hundreds of millions of people. The organizations they lead are hulking, hierarchical, and slow—and they are being forced to perform in a world where speed and agility are essential for success, and where networks of empowered individuals often trump centralized bureaucracies. The outcome of their efforts is not preordained, and the consequences will extend far beyond Catholics or Chinese citizens.

This article originally appeared in the Atlantic.

About the Author

Moisés Naím

Distinguished Fellow

Moisés Naím is a distinguished fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, a best-selling author, and an internationally syndicated columnist.

    Recent Work

  • Research
    The World Reacts to Biden’s First 100 Days
      • +10

      Rosa Balfour, Frances Z. Brown, Yasmine Farouk, …

  • Commentary
    View From Latin America

      Moisés Naím

Moisés Naím
Distinguished Fellow
Moisés Naím
Political ReformCivil SocietyReligionEast AsiaChinaWestern Europe

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

  • Paper
    Loyal but Powerless: The Downgrading of Russia’s Elite

    The ruling elites in contemporary Russia are not a political class, but a community of managers who are not subject to competition or public accountability. The state is becoming an operating apparatus without any internal autonomy.

      Alexandra Prokopenko

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    What Does Pashinyan’s Parliamentary Victory Mean for Armenia’s Future?

    Pashinyan’s pro-European party has been re-elected with a decisive victory. But the pro-Russian opposition could still slow Armenia’s progress toward peace with Azerbaijan and rapprochement with Europe.

      Mikayel Zolyan

  • Book
    From Sovereigns to Servants. How the War Against Ukraine Reshaped Russia’s Elite

    How did Putin co-opt Russia’s political and economic elites, ensuring no more than fitful resistance to the regime’s war on Ukraine?

      Alexandra Prokopenko

  • Europe trade economy container supply chains
    Paper
    From Trade Dependence to Geopolitical Leverage: The EU in an Era of Weaponized Interdependence

    As geopolitical rivalry weaponizes global supply chains, the EU’s true vulnerability lies in emerging-risk imports. For these goods, suppliers are growing more concentrated, substitution more difficult, and political risk is looming.

      Sinan Ülgen

  • Commentary
    Reviving Kosovo-Serbia Normalization Talks

    Three years after the Ohrid Agreement, Kosovo and Serbia remain far from normalization. To revive implementation, the EU should abandon its ambiguity and act as an even-handed arbitrator.

      • +1

      Miloš Pavković, Fitim Gashi, Iliriana Gjoni, …

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Carnegie global logo, stacked
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NWWashington, DC, 20036-2103Phone: 202 483 7600
  • Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
  • Donate
  • Programs
  • Events
  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Contact
  • Annual Reports
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Government Resources
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.