• Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Global logoCarnegie lettermark logo
Democracy
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Lahcen Achy"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "Egypt",
    "Gulf",
    "Levant",
    "Maghreb",
    "Middle East",
    "North Africa",
    "Iran",
    "Türkiye"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Economy"
  ]
}
In The Media
Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center

Arab States Need Industrial Policy Reform

Some Arab countries should adopt industrial policies that promote the acquisition of technical and technological knowledge, to boost productivity and make them more competitive.

Link Copied
By Lahcen Achy
Published on Sep 17, 2013

Source: Al-Hayat

Industrial policy has received considerable attention in the economic discourse of Arab countries since the 1960s, but real industrial development has often come in second. This is because state policies opted to preserve political balances in society by granting economic privileges and distributing income in the form of rent without taking into account considerations of efficiency. 

Looking at the experiences of Algeria, Egypt, and Morocco, it is clear that a distorted industrial policy led to a misallocation of labor and capital among industrial activities instead of toward activities that would improve productivity over the long term. This policy led to an increased tendency toward a rentier economy and resulted in huge costs incurred by governmental budgets in the form of nonperforming loans and the bankruptcy of state banks and industrial projects.

The performance of Arab countries has significantly differed from that of other emerging market economies, which over the past two decades have witnessed rapid growth in private investment and industrial production and in the diversity of manufactured products, with a heavy focus on technology. The employment challenges faced by Arab countries—in light of the demographic transitions they have witnessed—reveal the weaknesses of this nondiversified economic model, which is based primarily on the extraction and export of raw materials, agricultural and traditional activities, and some value-added industries that depend first and foremost on unskilled labor.

Rapid growth in information and communication technologies, an accelerated pace of technological change and rising levels of economic integration throughout the world highlight the need for Arab countries to focus on efficiency and to invest in acquiring technical and technological knowledge and modern management methods. Successful economic experiences across the world have proven that competitive advantages are not based on an abundance of natural resources or low-cost labor but rather on innovation, knowledge, and good management. 

A number of factors confirm the urgent need today for a new generation of industrial policies, especially after market reforms carried out by Arab countries failed to achieve any significant shift in economic structures or boost productivity, to put these countries in a position to cope with international competition. It has become clear that these countries cannot rely on foreign investment to achieve an industrial take-off because it is extremely volatile and focuses on investment opportunities that produce quick and substantially high profits and involve the lowest risks. 

The diversity of experiences with industrial policy in different countries demonstrates that the results of such policies mainly depend on their institutional environment, which also determines the approach that is adopted for formulation, implementation and evaluation. Furthermore, the relationship between political and economic interests usually determines the nature of the adopted industrial polices and the interest blocs that can take advantage of them. 

The economic literature distinguishes between sectoral industrial policies and horizontal policies. The former focuses on specific industries, or even specific companies, under the pretext of supporting emerging industries, by providing selective incentives so that local producers can reduce their costs and keep up with competitors. In contrast, horizontal policies benefit all companies and include measures such as improving education, upgrading employee skills, promoting research and development, and establishing an infrastructure that is appropriate and effective for practicing business.

The majority of East Asian and Latin American countries conducted wide-ranging reforms to the structures of their economies throughout the 1980s and 1990s by refocusing their strategies on policy packages that were more coherent and market oriented in order to encourage private sector export-led growth. However, the majority of Arab governments still rely on traditional industrial policies, with a sectoral focus.

They do so for two main reasons. First, in other parts of the developing world the state has offered privileges that include horizontal policies, which affect different activities and sectors, and it is not easy to mobilize beneficiaries on the political level. The development of skills and the adoption of innovative technological policies, for example, benefit a large number of companies. However, these benefits are typically small, and it is difficult to predict the level of political support that beneficiaries will mobilize for such policies.

Second, the consequences of many of these horizontal policies only become tangible after a long period of time—which may extend for years—as is the case with education, research and development. Interest groups are less likely to defend polices that are less important and that provide benefits only in the long term. It is the government's responsibility to enact such policies and to have a long-term vision with regard to development. 

Arab countries are now making a transition to a new generation of more horizontal policies. However, this process is slow-paced, especially compared to the transformations taking place in other parts of the developing world. Arab countries must carefully evaluate the traditional industrial polices they have implemented in past decades to determine the costly mistakes that were made. They must acknowledge that the socioeconomic challenges they face today require a review of earlier policies, and necessitate assigning priority to economic efficiency and competitiveness when allocating financial, fiscal, and other incentives. 

This transformation requires reforming the governance of the institutions responsible for implementing industrial policy, subjecting them to transparency and accountability measures, and providing more space for representatives of different groups involved in drafting policy. Overhauling mechanisms of governance will certainly help in the design and implementation of effective industrial policies so that the industrial sector plays a leading role in the development of Arab economies, guarantees good jobs, and improves household income levels.

This article was originally published in Arabic in Al-Hayat.

Lahcen Achy
Former Nonresident Senior Associate, Middle East Center
Lahcen Achy
EconomyEgyptGulfLevantMaghrebMiddle EastNorth AfricaIranTürkiye

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

  • Workers of automotive manufacturer VW assemble pieces of a model in the Uitenhage plant.
    Paper
    Win-Win: The Potential and Prospects of German FDI in Supporting the Structural Transformation of African Economies

    German manufacturing firms in Africa add value, jobs, and skills, while benefiting from demand and a diversification of trade and investment partners. It is in the interest of both African economies and Germany to deepen economic relations. 

      Hannah Grupp, Paul M. Lubeck

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Has Trump the Destroyer Eclipsed Putin the Destroyer?

    Unexpectedly, Trump’s America appears to have replaced Putin’s Russia’s as the world’s biggest disruptor.

      Alexander Baunov

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    The EU and India in Tandem

    As European leadership prepares for the sixteenth EU-India Summit, both sides must reckon with trade-offs in order to secure a mutually beneficial Free Trade Agreement.

      Dinakar Peri

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Baku Proceeds With Caution as Ethnic Azeris Join Protests in Neighboring Iran

    Baku may allow radical nationalists to publicly discuss “reunification” with Azeri Iranians, but the president and key officials prefer not to comment publicly on the protests in Iran.

      Bashir Kitachaev

  • High view of parabolic trough collectors at the Xina solar plant in South Africa
    Article
    Lack of Finance Is Not the Only Constraint on Global Development

    Global development needs imagination to update the purposes, structures, and systems of outmoded institutions to make them fit for today’s world.

      David McNair

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Carnegie global logo, stacked
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NWWashington, DC, 20036-2103Phone: 202 483 7600Fax: 202 483 1840
  • Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
  • Donate
  • Programs
  • Events
  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Contact
  • Annual Reports
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Government Resources
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.