Dr. Albert Keidel
{
"authors": [
"Albert Keidel"
],
"type": "legacyinthemedia",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "asia",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "AP",
"programs": [
"Asia"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"China",
"North America",
"United States",
"East Asia"
],
"topics": [
"Economy"
]
}Source: Getty
With the crisis, the Chinese economy could catch up with the United States' by 2030
Les Echos recently interviewed Albert Keidel, a researcher at the Carnegie Endowment, about the economic crisis. He asserted that the Chinese authorities should encourage domestic consumption and domestic investment and address social unrest in a balanced manner by distinguishing legitimate grievances from those that are not legitimate.
Source: Les Echos

A: I believe that it is incorrect to say that China's economic growth has essentially been nourished, notably in recent years, by exports. The growth of trade surpluses in the past three years has resulted in overheating in the country, which comes on top of a strong base of domestic demand.
Q: But, if exports are not the main engine of China's economic growth, how can its deceleration be explained?
A: Launched exactly one year ago, the efforts of the government to wrestle with inflation are largely responsible for the current problems. Trade difficulties are adding to it and making the deceleration even more brutal.
Q: What should the Chinese authorities do to ensure that growth retains its momentum?
A: The Chinese have shown that they have the means to stimulate their economy. They have completely eliminated the problem of inflation and have a solid financial system to assist the stimulus. They should now encourage domestic consumption and domestic investment. The Chinese still have a capital stock per capita that is extremely low.
Q: Is the growth of social movements in the country cause for concern?
A: Of course, everyone is worried about social unrest, but it is inevitable in an economy that is experiencing rapid growth and wrenching restructuring. This trade cycle will result in a serious reorganization of underperforming firms in coastal areas. The government must manage this process in a balanced manner by distinguishing legitimate grievances from those that are not legitimate. That will not be easy, but it is necessary.
Q: If one were to project beyond the crisis, where do you see China in 30 years for the 60th anniversary of economic reforms?
A: It is almost certain that China's GDP will be greater than that of the United States by 2038. With this crisis, this catching up could occur even sooner. Maybe just before 2030, if the Chinese recover fairly quickly as I expect and if the United States experiences very slow growth for several years.
Q: To guarantee the momentum of its growth, is China going to need to urgently start political reform?
A: In China, political reform must contribute to social stability and must allow different voices in society to have more and more space for influencing decision-making. The election of national leaders is not the only, and perhaps not the main, criterion for democratic progress in a poor society like China's. If political reform is a necessary part of rapid modernization, it is not so urgent as to call into question the whole current system. That could have unfortunate consequences, in the long term, for the success of democratic reforms, which will come in their time, in the longer term, as the economic welfare of the population increases.
About the Author
Former Senior Associate, China Program
Keidel served as acting director and deputy director for the Office of East Asian Nations at the U.S. Department of the Treasury. Before joining Treasury in 2001, he covered economic trends, system reforms, poverty, and country risk as a senior economist in the World Bank office in Beijing.
- As China's Exports Drop, Can Domestic Demand Drive Growth?Article
- China’s Fourth Quarter 2008 Statistical RecordArticle
Dr. Albert Keidel
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
- The Two Logics Driving Japan’s Security PolicyArticle
Japan’s revision of its three strategic documents reflects an intention to keep the United States engaged in the region while Japan fills any vacuums of U.S. power to preserve the Indo-Pacific order.
Ryo Sahashi
- Caught in the Middle: Chinese Biotech Firms’ Divergent Responses to U.S. SanctionsCommentary
Chinese biotech companies have been on the receiving end of U.S. economic coercion. Yet their responses have differed significantly because firm and state interests are not uniformly aligned. For Washington, treating all Chinese tech firms the same, irrespective of their actual interests, risks pushing them farther into Beijing’s corner.
Xue Gong
- Inside the Global Race to Erode a Battery Manufacturing MonopolyCommentary
Over the past decade, China has moved from marginal player to major producer of all things batteries. The United States, Europe, and others are aiming to balance the market.
Milo McBride
- A Geothermal and Nuclear Strategy for the U.S. International Development Finance CorporationPaper
The DFC should focus on advanced, low-carbon energy sources, prioritizing areas where the United States has comparative advantages.
Noah Gordon, Liana Schmitter-Emerson
- Why Korea’s President Skipped Washington for Silicon Valley and BrasíliaCommentary
Lee’s tour shows how Seoul is reorganizing its diplomacy away from Pyongyang and toward industrial networks and the geography of the compute economy.
Darcie Draudt-Véjares