• Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Global logoCarnegie lettermark logo
DemocracyIran
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Douglas H. Paal"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "asia",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "AP",
  "programs": [
    "Asia"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "United States",
    "East Asia",
    "China"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Economy",
    "Trade",
    "Foreign Policy"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media

Hu's Visit Charts Course for Future

The United States and China have already seen an improvement in bilateral ties in the months leading up to President Hu Jintao's visit to Washington and this positive momentum should be maintained going forward.

Link Copied
By Douglas H. Paal
Published on Jan 19, 2011
Program mobile hero image

Program

Asia

The Asia Program in Washington studies disruptive security, governance, and technological risks that threaten peace, growth, and opportunity in the Asia-Pacific region, including a focus on China, Japan, and the Korean peninsula.

Learn More

Source: China Daily

Hu's Visit Charts Course for Future President Hu Jintao's state visit to the United States this week is a crucial moment when it is possible to steer relations between the US and China - which many fear will inevitably clash - onto a stable course of cooperation and peaceful competition, for years or even decades to come.

The past year produced many warning signs of potential trouble as debates erupted on both sides about the other's intentions. Many in the US suspect China is trying to steal US jobs by unfair means and to knock the US from its leading position in world affairs. Many in China suspect the US is trying to "contain" China's return to greatness and its regional influence.

Fortunately, leaders in both countries over the past few months have refrained from the temptation to presume the worst about the other. They have worked to develop greater cooperation in the management of the many security, economic, and political issues that naturally arise among such different and globally engaged societies. They have raised their vision above the journalism of the day.

The Barack Obama administration reached out to the Chinese government last September, and together they set forth a road map to rebuild momentum in what they call a positive, cooperative, and comprehensive relationship.

Subsequently, the previously strained military-to-military relations were formally restored. The Joint Commission on Commerce and Trade held its most successful meeting yet in addressing trade and market access issues. China's currency increased in real terms by 10 percent, relieving both trade tension and China's domestic inflation. The US and China also reached a consensus on verification to mitigate the effects of climate change.

Perhaps most significantly, Chinese officials have recently reiterated their commitment to "peaceful development," and acknowledged that the US will enjoy global leadership for decades to come. When President Hu visits Washington, his reiteration of this policy stance will be welcome and helpful in reducing mutual mistrust.

For its part, the Obama administration has gone to extraordinary lengths to prepare for the visit and to send a message of willingness to partner with China on a range of issues. The secretaries of defense, state and commerce have delivered major speeches on the topic, and President Obama has immersed himself in detailed preparations.

For most of the first two decades of modern US-China relations, starting in 1972, the differences between the two countries were submerged in a common anti-Soviet stance. In the 1990s, differences over trade, human rights and regional security reemerged, as the common strategic objectives diffused.

After 2001, the US became fixated on counter-terrorism and awash in a bubble economy, to some extent diverting US eyes from US interests in Asia. China marched forward, as a new member of the World Trade Organization, rapidly growing its economy and attracting Western investment. China's regional influence and global interests grew accordingly. The China that has emerged is a much more capable country than at any time in the past nearly 40 years of the US-China relationship.

Today, the US is changing its foreign policy and returning to its traditional role in Asia. This is not intended to "contain" or threaten China, but to nurture, protect and advance US interests there. The problems that confront Washington and Beijing are wide-ranging and serious, but so too is the potential for cooperation. Despite different histories, cultures, values, and systems, the US and China nonetheless have the potential to perpetuate peace and prosperity together. China benefited greatly from the post-war system, as did the US and China's neighbors - Japan, the Republic of Korea, and Southeast Asia.

China, as a renewed, economically vibrant major power, can work with the US in the Asia-Pacific region to prolong peace and prosperity. Failure and conflict would waste the hopes of not just our two peoples, but of the 21st century as a whole.

President Hu's visit, and the careful preparations that preceded it, have set the stage for adopting a course to navigate the challenges of the next few years, as China goes through a generational transition in leadership and the US and others experience elections.

With wisdom and will, the meeting of Presidents Obama and Hu can chart the course for decades to come.

About the Author

Douglas H. Paal

Distinguished Fellow, Asia Program

Paal previously served as vice chairman of JPMorgan Chase International and as unofficial U.S. representative to Taiwan as director of the American Institute in Taiwan.

    Recent Work

  • Paper
    America’s Future in a Dynamic Asia

      Douglas H. Paal

  • Q&A
    U.S.-China Relations at the Forty-Year Mark
      • +1

      Douglas H. Paal, Tong Zhao, Chen Qi, …

Douglas H. Paal
Distinguished Fellow, Asia Program
Douglas H. Paal
EconomyTradeForeign PolicyUnited StatesEast AsiaChina

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

  • Pashinyan shaking hands
    Commentary
    Emissary
    At Stake in Armenia’s Election: Peace and Russian Influence

    Regardless of the outcome, there’s another path to ensuring that progress doesn’t stall.

      Zaur Shiriyev

  • Commentary
    Emissary
    Trump and Xi Are Angling for Three Years of Stability

    But their "principal to principal" model will only be as effective as the political strength of each leader back home.

      • Damien Ma

      Damien Ma

  • Recruit polices vow as they join in the police at Beijing Public Security Bureau on February 18, 2011 in Beijing, China. (
    Paper
    China’s Police and Security Cooperation Agreements

    China’s Ministry of Public Security is often portrayed as a domestic law enforcement agency, but it is also a global security actor. This paper explores how MPS has used international law enforcement and security cooperation agreements—over 200 since 2006—to advance China’s vision of security in a changing global environment.  

      • Sheena Chestnut Greitens

      Sophie Zhuang, Sheena Chestnut Greitens, Cameron Waltz

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Could Migrants From India and Africa Solve Russia’s Labor Shortage?

    The demands of the Kremlin’s war in Ukraine, demographic problems, and public hostility toward Central Asians mean Russia does not have enough workers.  

      Salavat Abylkalikov

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Europe Should Not Let Nuclear Nonproliferation Die

    Amid uncertainty caused by the Iran war, the global drive for nonproliferation has stalled. With Europe diplomatically marginalized and countries reassessing their nuclear options, efforts to curb the spread of nuclear weapons risk becoming irrelevant.

      • Jane Darby Menton

      Jane Darby Menton

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Carnegie global logo, stacked
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NWWashington, DC, 20036-2103Phone: 202 483 7600
  • Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
  • Donate
  • Programs
  • Events
  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Contact
  • Annual Reports
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Government Resources
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.