• Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Global logoCarnegie lettermark logo
DemocracyIran
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Judy Dempsey"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie Europe",
    "Carnegie China"
  ],
  "collections": [
    "China’s Foreign Relations"
  ],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Europe",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "Asia",
    "Europe"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Foreign Policy",
    "EU",
    "Economy"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media
Carnegie Europe

E.U. Trade Commissioner Is Getting a Raw Deal

European Union nations are increasingly making their own bilateral deals with China, damaging the unifying efforts of the E.U. trade commissioner.

Link Copied
By Judy Dempsey
Published on Sep 3, 2012

Source: New York Times

Being the European Union trade commissioner must sometimes be a thankless job, as Karel De Gucht is finding out. He has been fighting long and hard to establish a level playing field with China.

The issues are well known. For European companies, they include the protection of intellectual property rights, ending the dumping of Chinese goods on European markets and coming clean about the generous state subsidies given to Chinese firms when they bid for contracts or snap up European companies.

Mr. De Gucht is no pushover when it comes to dealing with China. But because of the euro crisis, E.U. countries are increasingly going it alone with China and ignoring the E.U. Commission. Big and small member states are vying with each other to win business in China and to attract Chinese investments in their own countries.

It’s as if all the downsides of doing business with China have been forgotten.

Here in Germany, the small and midsize companies known as the Mittelstand, which in the past complained about the difficulties of doing business in China, now play down problems like red tape and corruption. Given the economic climate, they prefer to lie low rather than speak out.

Some of the big German companies, including the carmakers, do speak out from time to time. They are weighty enough, and they have the ear of Chancellor Angela Merkel, who was in China last week, a visit I discuss in this week’s Letter from Europe.

Ms. Merkel used to be much more confrontational with China, calling often for more respect of human rights and press freedoms. She wants a strong economy and jobs to prevail in Germany over the next 12 months before the next federal elections. China can oblige.

Such attitudes do not help Mr. De Gucht, as national interests are prevailing in ways that prevent Europe from having a strong and united position in how to deal with China. Beijing can only be smiling.

This article originally appeared in the New York Times.

About the Author

Judy Dempsey

Nonresident Senior Fellow, Carnegie Europe

Judy Dempsey is a nonresident senior fellow at Carnegie Europe

    Recent Work

  • Commentary
    Europe Needs to Hear What America is Saying

      Judy Dempsey

  • Commentary
    Babiš’s Victory in Czechia Is Not a Turning Point for European Populists

      Judy Dempsey

Judy Dempsey
Nonresident Senior Fellow, Carnegie Europe
Judy Dempsey
Foreign PolicyEUEconomyAsiaEurope

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

  • Commentary
    Deciphering Europe’s Relationship with Turkey

    Debate is heating up on how Turkey could be integrated into a common European defense framework. Commercial and industrial deals offer a better chance at alignment than sweeping political efforts.

      Marc Pierini

  • Commentary
    Emerging From the “Zombie State” of Trade Agreements: The India-EU FTA

    The India–EU Free Trade Agreement (FTA) is shaping up to be one of the most consequential trade negotiations, both economically and strategically. But, what’s in the agreement, what’s missing, and what will determine its success in the years ahead

      Vrinda Sahai, Nicolas Köhler-Suzuki

  • Construction site
    Commentary
    Emissary
    The Iran War Isn’t the Only Challenge Facing Saudi Arabia’s Vision 2030

    As the monarchy appears to question its grandest projects, the state could do with more critical debate than rote cheerleading.

      • Andrew Leber

      Andrew Leber

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Taking the Pulse: Is it Worth it for Europeans to Placate Trump?

    After spending much of 2025 trying to placate Donald Trump, some European leaders are starting to change posture. But is even a hostile Washington still so important to Europe that the U.S. president’s outbursts are worth putting up with?

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz, ed.

  • Gas station attendant gesturing while a woman gets her motorcycle refilled
    Commentary
    Emissary
    Fuel Subsidies Are an Easy Fix for the Iran War’s Energy Price Shock—and the Wrong One

    Instead, governments should adopt climate-friendly measures to address the impact of rising prices.

      • Henok Asmelash

      Henok Asmelash

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Carnegie global logo, stacked
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NWWashington, DC, 20036-2103Phone: 202 483 7600
  • Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
  • Donate
  • Programs
  • Events
  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Contact
  • Annual Reports
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Government Resources
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.