China's Conflict Between Economic and Political Liberalization

{
  "authors": [
    "Yukon Huang"
  ],
  "type": "other",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "asia",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "AP",
  "programs": [
    "Asia"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "East Asia",
    "China"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Political Reform",
    "Economy"
  ]
}

Other

China's Conflict Between Economic and Political Liberalization

By Yukon Huang

Published on Dec 31, 2012

Source: SAIS Review

China’s impressive growth record has been facilitated by a unique relationship between Beijing and the provinces that encourages experimentation and incentivizes officials for driving economic growth—and for the most part this helped maintain political stability. While these arrangements spurred economic liberalization, political liberalization was put on hold. But rapid growth has not spared China from increasing social unrest given frustrations over widening disparities both in opportunities and outcomes and mounting conflicts over use of resources. Some now question the regime’s capacity to deal with society’s concerns. This paper examines recent politically charged events that have intensified discussions about the potential for economic and political reforms that would be acceptable to the Communist Party and still supportive of China’s broader objectives.

Three decades of economic liberalization have restored much of the vibrancy that China last displayed two centuries ago when it accounted for a significant share of the world’s economy. Yet its political system seems to have been caught in a time warp. Ever since the Arab Spring began dominating headlines, there has been renewed speculation that social unrest could foment a similar cascade of change in China. Even Premier Wen Jiabao concluded at last March’s National People’s Congress that dealing with pressures for political reform will be a high priority for the future leadership. But the Bo Xilai affair significantly escalated what is at stake by casting the issue as a conflict between reformers and those wedded to the past. This is now seen as influencing the transition to China’s next generation of senior leaders.

Discussions about China’s political evolution are normally grounded in debates over democratization, military security, and human rights. More attention, however, needs to be given to whether the nature of China’s economic transformation, supported by its unique form of regional decentralization, has contributed to a stalemate regarding political liberalization.

Read the full paper in the SAIS Review.

About the Author

Yukon Huang

Senior Fellow, Asia Program

Huang is a senior fellow in the Carnegie Asia Program where his research focuses on China’s economy and its regional and global impact.

Recent Work

Commentary
Three Takeaways From the Biden-Xi Meeting
- Yukon Huang, Isaac B. Kardon, Matt Sheehan
Commentary
Europe Narrowly Navigates De-risking Between Washington and Beijing
- Yukon Huang, Genevieve Slosberg

Political Reform Economy East Asia China

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

Commentary
Strategic Europe
There Is No Shortcut for Europe in Armenia
Europe has an interest in supporting Armenian leader Nikol Pashinyan as he tries to make peace with neighbors and loosen ties with Russia. But it is depersonalized support in the long term, not quickfire flash, that will win the day.
Thomas de Waal
Article
From Labor Scarcity to AI Society: Governing Productivity in East Asia
The debate over AI and work too often centers on displacement. Facing aging populations and shrinking workforces, East Asian policymakers view AI not as a threat, but as a cross-sectoral workforce strategy.
Darcie Draudt-Véjares, Sophie Zhuang
Article
Governing AI in the Shadow of Giants: Korea’s Strategic Response to Great Power AI Competition
In its version of an AI middle power strategy, Seoul is pursuing alignment with the United States not as an endpoint but as a strategy to build industrial and geopolitical leverage. Whether this balance holds remains an open question.
Darcie Draudt-Véjares, Seungjoo Lee
Commentary
China Financial Markets
Is China’s High-Quality Investment Output Economically Viable?
China’s rapid technological progress and its first-rate infrastructure are often cited as refuting the claim that China has been systematically overinvesting in non-productive projects for many years. In fact, as the logic of overinvestment and the many historical precedents show, the former is all-too-often consistent with the latter.
Michael Pettis
Commentary
Carnegie Politika
The Much-Touted Middle Corridor Transport Route Could Prove a Dead End
For the Middle Corridor to fulfill its promises, one of these routes must become scalable. At present, neither is.
Friedrich Conradi

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

Commentary

Strategic Europe

There Is No Shortcut for Europe in Armenia

Europe has an interest in supporting Armenian leader Nikol Pashinyan as he tries to make peace with neighbors and loosen ties with Russia. But it is depersonalized support in the long term, not quickfire flash, that will win the day.

Thomas de Waal

Article

From Labor Scarcity to AI Society: Governing Productivity in East Asia

The debate over AI and work too often centers on displacement. Facing aging populations and shrinking workforces, East Asian policymakers view AI not as a threat, but as a cross-sectoral workforce strategy.

Darcie Draudt-Véjares, Sophie Zhuang

Article

Governing AI in the Shadow of Giants: Korea’s Strategic Response to Great Power AI Competition

In its version of an AI middle power strategy, Seoul is pursuing alignment with the United States not as an endpoint but as a strategy to build industrial and geopolitical leverage. Whether this balance holds remains an open question.

Darcie Draudt-Véjares, Seungjoo Lee

Commentary

China Financial Markets

Is China’s High-Quality Investment Output Economically Viable?

China’s rapid technological progress and its first-rate infrastructure are often cited as refuting the claim that China has been systematically overinvesting in non-productive projects for many years. In fact, as the logic of overinvestment and the many historical precedents show, the former is all-too-often consistent with the latter.

Michael Pettis

Commentary

Carnegie Politika

The Much-Touted Middle Corridor Transport Route Could Prove a Dead End

For the Middle Corridor to fulfill its promises, one of these routes must become scalable. At present, neither is.

Friedrich Conradi