• Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Global logoCarnegie lettermark logo
DemocracyIran
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Frederic Wehrey"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center"
  ],
  "collections": [
    "Arab Awakening"
  ],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "menaTransitions",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "MEP",
  "programs": [
    "Middle East"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "Middle East",
    "North Africa",
    "Egypt",
    "United Arab Emirates",
    "Gulf"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Political Reform"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media

The Egypt-UAE Diplomatic Crisis

The Egyptian-Emirati diplomatic tensions reflect the larger Gulf-wide unease over the Arab Spring.

Link Copied
By Frederic Wehrey
Published on Jan 17, 2013
Program mobile hero image

Program

Middle East

The Middle East Program in Washington combines in-depth regional knowledge with incisive comparative analysis to provide deeply informed recommendations. With expertise in the Gulf, North Africa, Iran, and Israel/Palestine, we examine crosscutting themes of political, economic, and social change in both English and Arabic.

Learn More

Source: World Politics Review

In January, the United Arab Emirates arrested a group of Egyptians on suspicion of forming a Muslim Brotherhood cell in the country, prompting tensions with the Muslim Brotherhood-led Egyptian government. In an email interview, Frederic Wehrey, a Middle East program senior associate at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, discussed Egypt-UAE relations. 

World Politics Review: What has been the trajectory of relations between Egypt and the UAE since the fall of Hosni Mubarak?   

Frederic Wehrey: Throughout 2011, bilateral relations were strained by mounting concern in the UAE over Egypt’s potential warming to Iran. For their part, Egypt’s new leaders have cast a wary eye on the Persian Gulf states because of their previous support for the Mubarak regime. Moreover, the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt is angered by the Emirates’ sheltering of Mubarak-era figures, most notably the defeated presidential candidate and former Prime Minister Ahmad Shafiq. More important, however, is the UAE government’s concern that the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood may seek to export its ideology and political program to the Gulf. Emirati officials have stated repeatedly that the Brotherhood does not recognize national boundaries and sovereign rulers, and is seeking to use local sympathizers, like the al-Islah NGO, to undermine the stability of the UAE. At its core, these worries reflect a broader unease in the Gulf with the contagion effect of the Arab uprisings. 

A key catalyst for the current standoff was a threat by Dubai Police Chief Dahi Khalfan in February 2012 to arrest the popular cleric Yusuf Qaradawi for criticizing the UAE’s expulsion of Syrians who demonstrated outside the Syrian Consulate in Dubai. A Brotherhood spokesman in Egypt then threatened that the “entire Muslim world” would react against the UAE if Qaradawi were arrested. From this point on, relations quickly spiraled downward, culminating in the Emirates’ Jan. 1 arrest of 11 Egyptians alleged to be members of a Brotherhood cell. 

WPR: What is the significance of the UAE's arrest of Egyptian members of the Muslim Brotherhood?   

Wehrey: The arrest is the starkest example yet of a growing trend in the Emirates of silencing any hints of organized political opposition. At the diplomatic level, the arrests have catapulted a simmering war of words into a diplomatic crisis. It has also handed Qatar an opportunity to exert its regional influence as a mediator -- although Emirati commentators argue that Qatar is hardly a neutral third party, given its support for Brotherhood groups across the region and its recent $2.5 billion bailout loan to Egypt.

WPR: What are the prospects for resolving the dispute and for moving the broader bilateral relationship onto a more constructive footing?    

Wehrey: The relationship is likely to be buffeted by continued turbulence, but I believe the overall trajectory can be repaired due to shared strategic interests. Both states share a mutual threat from Iran -- the much-feared warming of relations between Egypt and Iran has not materialized. The Emirates recognize that Egypt’s centrality in Arab affairs is an important counter to Iran, as well as a hedge against an overbearing Saudi Arabia. For its part, the Brotherhood is keen to attract Gulf investment. A key first step is for both sides to avoid strident and provocative statements that fuel the rancor that currently afflicts the relationship.

This article originally appeared in World Politics Review.

About the Author

Frederic Wehrey

Senior Fellow, Middle East Program

Frederic Wehrey is a senior fellow in the Middle East Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, where his research focuses on governance, conflict, and security in Libya, North Africa, and the Persian Gulf.

    Recent Work

  • Research
    Russia in Africa: Examining Moscow’s Influence and Its Limits
      • Nate Reynolds
      • +11

      Frances Z. Brown, Nate Reynolds, Priyal Singh, …

  • Commentary
    How the Flaws of Trump’s Gaza Deal Prevent an Enduring Peace

      Charles H. Johnson, Frederic Wehrey

Frederic Wehrey
Senior Fellow, Middle East Program
Frederic Wehrey
Political ReformMiddle EastNorth AfricaEgyptUnited Arab EmiratesGulf

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

  • Trump with arms out, surrounded by mics
    Commentary
    Emissary
    The Problem With the Idea That Netanyahu Made Trump Attack Iran

    Going to war was the U.S. president’s decision, for which he alone is responsible.

      Daniel C. Kurtzer, Aaron David Miller

  • Trump and Netanyahu speaking
    Commentary
    Emissary
    The Diverging U.S. and Israeli Goals in Iran Are Making the Endgame Even Murkier

    The cracks between Trump and Netanyahu have become more pronounced, particularly over energy and leadership targets.

      • Eric Lob

      Eric Lob

  • Seoul traffic at night
    Commentary
    Emissary
    How the Hormuz Closure Is Testing the Korean President’s Progressive Agenda

    The crisis is not just a story of energy vulnerability. It’s also a complex, high-stakes political challenge.

      Darcie Draudt-Véjares

  • Commentary
    Diwan
    What Does the Strait of Hormuz’s Closure Mean?

    In an interview, Roger Diwan discusses where the global economy may be going in the third week of the U.S.-Israeli war with Iran.

      Nur Arafeh

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Russia’s Imperial Retreat Is Europe’s Strategic Opportunity

    The war in Ukraine is costing Russia its leverage overseas. Across the South Caucasus and Middle East, this presents an opportunity for Europe to pick up the pieces and claim its own sphere of influence.

      William Dixon, Maksym Beznosiuk

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Carnegie global logo, stacked
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NWWashington, DC, 20036-2103Phone: 202 483 7600Fax: 202 483 1840
  • Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
  • Donate
  • Programs
  • Events
  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Contact
  • Annual Reports
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Government Resources
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.