Commentary
Leaning into a multispeed Europe that includes the UK is the way Europeans don’t get relegated to suffering what they must, while the mighty United States and China do what they want.
Rym Momtaz
{
"authors": [
"Thomas de Waal"
],
"type": "commentary",
"centerAffiliationAll": "",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Carnegie Europe",
"Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Europe",
"programAffiliation": "",
"programs": [],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"Central Asia",
"Caucasus",
"Russia",
"Eastern Europe"
],
"topics": [
"Foreign Policy"
]
}
Source: Getty
Commentary
Missing the USSR
To mention the Soviet Union on most of its former territory evokes pleasant nostalgia, not revulsion. However, no one, beginning with President Putin, is planning its second coming.
Published on Jan 15, 2014
What is there to miss about the Soviet Union? "Nothing," say those who live west of the old Soviet border. "The day the USSR ended was a day of liberation."
Hence the gravity intended in the warnings of Western politicians that Vladimir Putin’s Eurasian Union project is a new Soviet Union in disguise. Former U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton set the trend when she commented in December 2012 that the union was "a move to re-Sovietise the region."
Those same leaders should pause to take a look at a Gallup poll taken last month in 11 of the 15 former Soviet republics (Uzbekistan and the Baltic States were left out).
It showed that in seven of the 11 countries more people believe that the break-up of the Soviet Union harmed their country more than it benefited them.
This answer comes from people of all ages and all corners of the former union. In Armenia, Kyrgyzstan, Russia, and Ukraine barely 20 per cent of those polled voicing positive thoughts about the end of the USSR. (The highest rate of approval for the demise of the Soviet Union actually came in authoritarian Turkmenistan, which is a little suspicious—this surely is one place which was actually more free and open 25 years ago than today.)
Of course the Soviet Union people are missing for is a figment of the imagination. It is not that of Stalin or the late 1980s but most likely that of Brezhnev's 1970's consumer boom, an era recalled as one of innocence and prosperity at home and respect and fear abroad.
Vladimir Putin is often quoted as having called the end of the Soviet Union "the greatest geopolitical catastrophe of the [20th] century." The actual quotation, made in his speech to parliament in April 2005, is more ambiguous and could equally be translated as "the tremendous geopolitical catastrophe of the age."
Either way, it was not a programmatic speech. Putin has also more than once approvingly quoted a phrase from the 1990s made popular by the strongman of that era, Alexander Lebed, "Whoever does not regret the destruction of the Soviet Union doesn't have a heart, whoever wants to recreate it doesn't have a head."
Most Russians, it would seem, agree. To mention the Soviet Union on most of its territory evokes pleasant nostalgia, not revulsion. But, fortunately no one, beginning with President Putin, is planning its second coming.
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
- To Survive, the EU Must Split
- In Uzbekistan, the President’s Daughter Is Now His Second-in-CommandCommentary
Having failed to build a team that he can fully trust or establish strong state institutions, Mirziyoyev has become reliant on his family.
Galiya Ibragimova
- U.S. Peace Mediation in the Middle East: Lessons for the Gaza Peace PlanPaper
As Gaza peace negotiations take center stage, Washington should use the tools that have proven the most effective over the past decades of Middle East mediation.
Amr Hamzawy, Sarah Yerkes, Kathryn Selfe
- Russia’s Unspoken Condition for Ending the War Is Zelensky’s ResignationCommentary
Insisting on Zelensky’s resignation is not just a personal vendetta, but a clear signal that the Kremlin would like to send to all its neighbors: even if you manage to put up some resistance, you will ultimately pay the price—including on a personal level.
Vladislav Gorin
- For Putin, Increasing Russia’s Nuclear Threat Matters More Than the Triad’s ModernizationCommentary
For Putin, upgrading Russia’s nuclear forces was a secondary goal. The main aim was to gain an advantage over the West, including by strengthening the nuclear threat on all fronts. That made growth in missile arsenals and a new arms race inevitable.
Maxim Starchak
