Worried Ukrainian voices quickly added: this is what we were fighting for? Deputy Foreign Minister Danilo Lubkivsky resigned, announcing on his Facebook page,

“The statement on delaying the implementation of the agreement on association with the EU made by FM Klimkin was a surprise to me. I hope, rational and practical explanations will be given.  The statement sends wrong signals to the aggressor, allies and, most importantly, to Ukrainians. It is the time when our crisis-torn economy has to have a chance to survive. The chance cannot be put off.”

Not so fast. These immediate and emotional reactions reveal that many in the West still view Ukraine through the prism of Russia policy. Yet, as always is the case in trade matters, the devil resides in the details.

First, simultaneous ratification by the Rada and European Parliament of the Association Agreement will go ahead as originally scheduled on September 16. The Association Agreement has huge symbolic value for Ukrainians, and ratification is a good vehicle for Poroshenko and his government to meet those expectations.

Second, the trilateral negotiations between the EU, Ukraine, and Russia showed that the Russians are being obnoxious, demanding the removal of upwards of 20 percent of the tariff lines in the agreement. At the same time, Ukraine is fighting a war in the heart of its industrial base, the Donbas. The Donbas accounted for nearly 16 percent of GDP in 2012 and 23 percent of industrial production in the first quarter of 2014, according to IMF data.

Lost in the discussion about Friday’s surprise decision: the fact that the Association Agreement requires Kyiv to spend tens of billions of dollars (which it obviously doesn't have) to implement a variety of long-term reforms. At the moment, Ukraine faces existential issues as its economy and finances are in ruins. Trade liberalization won’t bring back hot water to Kyiv, or enough gas to heat houses and run hugely inefficient enterprises in the east during the fast-approaching winter.

Third, the Friday announcement in Brussels also included a Russian promise not to impose trade restrictions on Ukraine. Moscow for more than a year has used such measures to try to crush Ukrainian support for closer ties to the EU. This concession could be a very significant step back from the brink, provided that it is implemented in good faith. That is a big if, obviously.

Fourth, the EU will extend its low tariff regime for Ukrainian exports during this period while Ukraine can continue to impose tariffs on EU goods. These steps will provide meaningful financial support to Ukraine’s state coffers without using EU funds—thus, Ukraine has won an important concession from Brussels.

Make no mistake: EU management of the Ukraine crisis is increasingly chaotic, and we don’t know exactly what the new team on the European Commission will do. The desire to return to business as usual with Moscow is still quite strong in Brussels.

At the same time, it is high time to stop thinking about Ukraine as a place where a proxy war with Putin can be fought, let alone won. Persisting in that approach will have a predictable result, and Ukraine will be definitely lost.