• Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Global logoCarnegie lettermark logo
DemocracyIran
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Milan Vaishnav"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "SAP",
  "programs": [
    "South Asia"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "North America",
    "United States",
    "South Asia",
    "India"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Foreign Policy"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media

No Big Ideas in India-U.S. Relations—and That’s OK

U.S.-India relations have not meandered because of a lack of ideas; they’ve ebbed and flowed thanks to over-hyped pledges followed by half-baked implementation.

Link Copied
By Milan Vaishnav
Published on Jan 22, 2015
Program mobile hero image

Program

South Asia

The South Asia Program informs policy debates relating to the region’s security, economy, and political development. From strategic competition in the Indo-Pacific to India’s internal dynamics and U.S. engagement with the region, the program offers in-depth, rigorous research and analysis on South Asia’s most critical challenges.

Learn More

Source: Live Mint

For the last several years, there have been countless meetings, seminars and op-eds emerging out of both New Delhi and Washington in search of the next big thing in US-India relations. A constant refrain of this elusive quest is that the two sides need to identify a transformational deal, in the vein of the 2005 civil nuclear cooperation pact, to galvanize their bureaucracies and elevate the partnership to the next level.

Here’s a little secret: there are no new, big ideas in US-India relations.

Judging by the ongoing difficulties negotiating the terms of a bilateral investment treaty and the fraught trade politics in Washington, a US-India free trade agreement (FTA) is a distant dream.

Indian environmental negotiators have repeatedly made it clear that a breakthrough deal on climate change, akin to what the US and China brokered, is not on the cards.

Announcements of massive new Chinese and Japanese investments in India have spurred hopes that the US will follow suit and increase its commitment to Indian infrastructure, but the US government quite simply does not have the capital—or the tools—to launch a massive building spree.

These obstacles to blockbuster deals might prompt fears of renewed stagnation in US-India relations. But here’s why the future still looks bright.

Given the fallout of the Devyani Khobragade affair, the sinking Indian economy, perceived American indifference to India, and Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s decade-long visa denial, the commentariat was chock full of gloomy predictions about the state of India-US affairs in the wake of the 2014 general election.

Yet, Modi took many people by surprise, including some in his inner circle, by unhesitatingly embracing the US. To be fair, the Obama administration deserves credit for swiftly inviting the new Prime Minister to visit Washington within hours of his election and making good on that invitation by rolling out the red carpet for Modi four months ago.

During that September trip, expectations for concrete deliverables were low; it was a getting-to-know-you visit, a first chance for the two leaders (and administrations) to size one another up.

By all accounts, both leaders liked what they saw. Ever since, there has been a whirlwind of activity. The two leaders have met twice in the interim; innumerable high-level delegations have crisscrossed the Atlantic; and, along the way, trade negotiators forged a compromise to salvage the trade facilitation agreement.

With relations back on firmer ground, what is needed now is to not to dream up new initiatives, but to consummate old ones. US-India relations have not meandered because of a lack of ideas; they’ve ebbed and flowed thanks to over-hyped pledges followed by half-baked implementation. Whatever creative energies both parties can summon must be channelled into devising solutions to break through the usual logjams rather than creating new gridlock.

The good news is that both sides seem, for the first time in recent memory, ready and willing to do just that. Three areas appear ripe for making headway.

Many in Washington are still reeling from the failure to realize collaboration in the civil nuclear domain, their hopes dashed by India’s stringent nuclear liability legislation. The Modi government, in contrast to its predecessor, seems genuinely willing to find ways to calm investors’ nerves.

For instance, there are Indian proposals on the table to create an insurance pool to indemnify nuclear suppliers and to amend the liability law to limit exposure, in the event of a disaster, to criminal—rather than civil—liabilities.

On defence, the inability to jointly develop and manufacture defence materiel has been a glass ceiling on the partnership. Now, the co-production and co-development of defence technology appears to be matter of when, not if. The nomination of Ashton Carter to be the next US secretary of defence bodes well; as the former number two at the Pentagon, Carter was widely credited with helping to usher in a positive shift in the defence department’s stance on India.

Although a game-changing pact does not appear to be on the cards on energy and environmental issues, there is a bargain to be had where both sides can claim victory. The Obama administration has been riding India hard to make stepped up commitments to reducing carbon emissions. Judging by India’s statements at the recent Lima climate conference, it is not willing to move very far without hard commitments from the West on financing and technology transfer. However, India covets shale gas exports from the US (which are restricted to FTA partners) and the Obama administration is considering new funding for research and development of green technologies. Throw in progress on nuclear liability, and there’s something for everyone.

In some ways, there is a unique window of opportunity to get things done. The US economy is buoyant, with gross domestic product growth expected to clock in above 3% in 2015. The Obama administration and members of Congress, on both sides of the aisle, are energized by a new Indian government, which appears willing to engage even on issues once viewed as intractable. By visiting India twice, and with the latter visit on an occasion as symbolic as Republic Day, the President is elevating the status of the world’s largest democracy in Washington. On the Indian side, while domestic investment still struggles, there are green shoots in the economy thanks to subsiding inflation and rising private consumption. The government, its economic team now in place, is slowly unveiling its reform vision. On foreign policy, the PM seems keen to move beyond the straitjackets of the standard talking points.

But what could sink this newfound momentum is a failure to close out past business. During the final two years of the United Progressive Alliance-II, India’s status had plummeted in the eyes of the DC establishment thanks to its foundering economy and moves toward protectionism; from Delhi’s perspective, Washington talked a good game about defining partnership, but failed to back it up. We could yet revert to this dejected disappointment if the two sides do not demonstrate to their respective domestic constituencies that they can pluck the low-hanging fruit.

In this era of US-India relations, it’s time to sweat the small stuff.

This article was originally published in Live Mint.

About the Author

Milan Vaishnav

Director and Senior Fellow, South Asia Program

Milan Vaishnav is a senior fellow and director of the South Asia Program and the host of the Grand Tamasha podcast at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. His primary research focus is the political economy of India, and he examines issues such as corruption and governance, state capacity, distributive politics, and electoral behavior. He also conducts research on the Indian diaspora.

    Recent Work

  • Commentary
    Indian Americans Still Lean Left. Just Not as Reliably.
      • +1

      Sumitra Badrinathan, Devesh Kapur, Andy Robaina, …

  • Paper
    Indian Americans in a Time of Turbulence: 2026 Survey Results
      • +1

      Milan Vaishnav, Sumitra Badrinathan, Devesh Kapur, …

Milan Vaishnav
Director and Senior Fellow, South Asia Program
Milan Vaishnav
Foreign PolicyNorth AmericaUnited StatesSouth AsiaIndia

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

  • Mullin with his hand raised, taking an oath
    Commentary
    Emissary
    Can Mullin Revive FEMA?

    Restoring competence and trust to the anemic, neglected disaster recovery agency is a matter of national security.

      • Sarah Labowitz

      Sarah Labowitz, Debbra Goh

  • Worker pushing machinery toward a car frame
    Commentary
    Emissary
    Europe’s New Industrial Policy Can Learn From U.S. Mistakes

    Although the IAA often differs from the IRA, European policymakers can still take note of the U.S. act’s shortcomings.

      Milo McBride

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Time to Merge the Commission and EEAS

    The EU is structurally incapable of reacting to today’s foreign policy crises. The union must fold the EEAS into the European Commission and create a security council better prepared to take action on the global stage.

      Stefan Lehne

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    What the Russian Energy Sector Stands to Gain From War in the Middle East

    The future trajectory of the U.S.-Iran war remains uncertain, but its impact on global energy trade flows and ties will be far-reaching. Moscow is likely to become a key beneficiary of these changes; the crisis in the Gulf also strengthens Russia’s hand in its relationships with China and India, where advantages might prove more durable.

      • Sergey Vakulenko

      Sergey Vakulenko

  • Gen Z United activists hold a demonstration in Kathmandu, Nepal, on September 8 and 9, 2025, under the banner ''Don't Forget the Blood of Martyrs,'' honoring protest martyrs and demanding justice and accountability for those killed during past movements.
    Article
    Gen Z Protests Across Asia Offer a Delicate but Renewed Democratic Order

    A disconnect between Gen Z citizenry and older rulers has fueled massive demonstrations. What are the key issues and how is protest energy translating into electoral change?

      • Usama Khilji

      Usama Khilji

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Carnegie global logo, stacked
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NWWashington, DC, 20036-2103Phone: 202 483 7600Fax: 202 483 1840
  • Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
  • Donate
  • Programs
  • Events
  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Contact
  • Annual Reports
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Government Resources
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.