Andrei Kolesnikov
{
"authors": [
"Andrei Kolesnikov"
],
"type": "commentary",
"centerAffiliationAll": "",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "",
"programs": [],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"Russia",
"Eastern Europe",
"Ukraine",
"Western Europe",
"France",
"Germany"
],
"topics": [
"Foreign Policy"
]
}Source: Getty
After Minsk, Is Germany Still a Leader?
If Merkel is synonymous with Germany, then German political and diplomatic weight has certainly risen to the height of true European leadership.
Of course, nothing would have happened without Angela Merkel, the most influential European politician of our time. We wouldn’t have seen her and Francois Hollande in Moscow for a weekend blitz, nor would we have witnessed the magical night at the Normandy Four summit in Minsk, which conjures up associations with the Normandie-Niemen operation.
If Merkel is synonymous with Germany, then German political and diplomatic weight has certainly risen to the height of true European leadership. It is telling that Germany and France—two key states with a complicated history of bilateral relations and a baggage of past wars against each other—spearheaded the efforts to save peace in Europe. In fact, the Merkel-Hollande initiative looks quite symbolic and historically relevant in the context of the countries’ track record of military confrontation, as did the roles played by Jean Monnet, Robert Schuman, and Konrad Adenauer. Of similar importance was the French participation in constructing united Europe, which would have been impossible without Germany, and the reunification of Germany, which grew out of the collapse of the Iron Curtain and Berlin Wall.
If #Merkel is synonymous with #Germany, then German political and diplomatic weight has certainly risen.Tweet This
Vladimir Putin was once considered “a German in the Kremlin.” From a psychological and linguistic standpoint, he has an easier time communicating with the West through Germany. Being a responsible and forward-thinking politician, Merkel understands that and has been trying to translate Putin’s “dialect” of Russian into the language understandable to the Europeans. And being the most influential woman in the world, she is bound to share part of her charisma with the rest of Germany.
About the Author
Former Senior Fellow, Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
Kolesnikov was a senior fellow at the Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center.
- How the Putin Regime Subverted the Soviet LegacyCommentary
- Putin’s New Social JusticeCommentary
Andrei Kolesnikov
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
- Parliamentary Elections in Occupied Ukraine Risk Backfiring for the KremlinCommentary
Despite unhappiness on the ground, Moscow is determined to use both carrot and stick to ensure there is record support for United Russia in occupied Ukraine.
Konstantin Skorkin
- The Le Pen Verdict: How French Politics Turned MAGACommentary
Far-right leader Marine Le Pen can—and will—run in France’s next presidential election. What does the outcome of her appeal against a 2025 embezzlement conviction mean for the country’s political future?
Catherine Fieschi
- Nolan’s "The Odyssey" Has a Colonialism ProblemCommentary
Despite Morocco’s hopes that its film industry would reap rewards, the blockbuster’s success will be tainted by controversy surrounding filming in occupied Western Sahara.
Sarah Yerkes
- Securing America’s Near Abroad: Recalibrating U.S. Policy Toward HaitiPaper
Helping to stabilize Haiti is in the United States’ national interest and can be done by making wise use of various foreign policy tools in addition to supporting international security forces.
Christopher Shell
- Network and Structural Power: The Four Trend Lines Weakening U.S. LeveragePaper
Networks—from international payments platforms to key economic sectors—underlie many aspects of U.S. power. But they are suffering under an extractive approach to foreign policy.
Daniel W. Drezner