Q&A
Matt Ferchen
{
"authors": [
"Matt Ferchen"
],
"type": "legacyinthemedia",
"centerAffiliationAll": "",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Carnegie China"
],
"collections": [
"China and the Developing World",
"China’s Foreign Relations"
],
"englishNewsletterAll": "",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie China",
"programAffiliation": "",
"programs": [],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"North America",
"South America",
"East Asia",
"China"
],
"topics": [
"Economy",
"Foreign Policy"
]
}
Source: Getty
In The Media
Is China Filling a Void Left by the U.S. in Latin America?
A meaningful change in China-Latin America relations requires inducing development and sustainable economic ties between the two players, notably through standardized protocols.
By Matt Ferchen
Published on Dec 1, 2016
Source: Latin America Advisor
Inter-American Dialogue: Chinese President Xi Jinping visited Ecuador, Peru, and Chile in mid-November during a trip that also included his participation in the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit in Lima. The visit was Xi’s third to Latin America since he took office in 2013. What did he accomplish for China during the trip, and what was the trip’s significance for the Latin American countries he visited? What is the future of Chinese influence in Latin America as compared to U.S. influence in the region as the world looks ahead to Donald Trump assuming the presidency of the United States? How is China’s economy and the country’s currency, currently trading at multiyear lows, factoring into Latin America’s economic outlook?
Matt Ferchen: The key headline from Xi Jinping’s recent trip to Latin America, repeated in many major western and Chinese media outlets, was that China was taking over the role of economic leadership in the Asia-Pacific just as the United States is setting to embark on a new period of isolationism and protectionism. Even before Xi’s trip, the official Chinese press was trumpeting a ‘new era’ of China-Latin America relations. Yet, what these headlines missed was that the end of the commodity boom, from about 2003-2013, had already ushered in a new period of China-South America economic relations. China-South America trade, dependent as it has been on the export of South American mineral, energy, and agricultural goods and the import of Chinese manufactures and capital, has been a case study in both the upsides and the downsides of classic comparative advantage relations. All the discussion about Chinese-led efforts to promote greater Asia-Pacific trade misses the point that South American exports to China, and most Chinese investment in the region, will continue to be largely focused on raw materials. Neither in the immediate wake of the end of the commodity boom nor during Xi’s recent trip has there been much serious discussion about what Latin American governments, citizens, and businesses propose as a more sustainable, development-enhancing relationship with China. Such discussions might begin with a focus on region-wide efforts at standardizing environmental and social protocols for extractive industry and infrastructure investments from China and elsewhere, and ensuring those are consistent with similar protocols in Chinese-led institutions like the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank and the New Development Bank.
About the Author
Matt Ferchen
Former Nonresident Scholar, Carnegie-Tsinghua Center for Global Policy
Ferchen specializes in China’s political-economic relations with emerging economies. At the Carnegie–Tsinghua Center for Global Policy, he ran a program on China’s economic and political relations with the developing world, including Latin America.
- How China Is Reshaping International Development
- Why Unsustainable Chinese Infrastructure Deals Are a Two-Way StreetArticle
Matt Ferchen, Anarkalee Perera
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
- The Diverging U.S. and Israeli Goals in Iran Are Making the Endgame Even MurkierCommentary
The cracks between Trump and Netanyahu have become more pronounced, particularly over energy and leadership targets.
Eric Lob
- How the Hormuz Closure Is Testing the Korean President’s Progressive AgendaCommentary
The crisis is not just a story of energy vulnerability. It’s also a complex, high-stakes political challenge.
Darcie Draudt-Véjares
- Russia’s Imperial Retreat Is Europe’s Strategic OpportunityCommentary
The war in Ukraine is costing Russia its leverage overseas. Across the South Caucasus and Middle East, this presents an opportunity for Europe to pick up the pieces and claim its own sphere of influence.
William Dixon, Maksym Beznosiuk
- Takaichi’s Security Agenda After the Landslide ElectionArticle
Backed by a new LDP supermajority, Prime Minister Takaichi aspires to revise Japan’s long-standing security doctrine. Ahead of her visit to Washington, she faces fiscal hurdles for her proposed defense spending while needing to navigate President Trump’s request for naval assets to the Strait of Hormuz.
Harukata Takenaka
- Europe and the Arab Gulf Must Come TogetherCommentary
The war in Iran proves the United States is now a destabilizing actor for Europe and the Arab Gulf. From protect their economies and energy supplies to safeguarding their territorial integrity, both regions have much to gain from forming a new kind of partnership together.
Rym Momtaz
