• Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Global logoCarnegie lettermark logo
DemocracyIran
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Erik Brattberg",
    "Viola Meyerweissflog"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie Europe"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "EP",
  "programs": [
    "Europe"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "Western Europe",
    "Germany",
    "Europe",
    "Iran"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Political Reform",
    "EU"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media

German Political Upheaval Has Consequences for All of Europe

The unexpected breakdown of the coalition talks risks thrusting Germany into unprecedented political territory, and the rest of Europe into prolonged political uncertainty with some serious potential ramifications.

Link Copied
By Erik Brattberg and Viola Meyerweissflog
Published on Nov 24, 2017
Program mobile hero image

Program

Europe

The Europe Program in Washington explores the political and security developments within Europe, transatlantic relations, and Europe’s global role. Working in coordination with Carnegie Europe in Brussels, the program brings together U.S. and European policymakers and experts on strategic issues facing Europe.

Learn More

Source: Hill

For a country that highly values and is accustomed to steady governance and predictable politics, the decision this month by the Free Democratic Party to walk away from coalition talks with Angela Merkel came as a shock in Germany. Ever since the outcome of the federal elections in September, which produced the most fragmented German Bundestag in decades, it has been clear that forming a new governing coalition would not be straightforward. Weeks went by, deadlines were missed, the tone between the likely coalition parties grew sharper, but few predicted no deal at all.

This unexpected breakdown of the coalition talks risks thrusting Germany into unprecedented political territory, and the rest of Europe into prolonged political uncertainty with some serious potential ramifications. A key factor will be how long it will take for Germany to form a new stable government, as there is little doubt it eventually will. Three main scenarios seem possible now.

The first one is resumed coalition talks. In a public address German President Frank Walter Steinmeier, urged the parties to resume talks and reminded them of the responsibility that they received from voters on Election Day. He is expected to encourage the Free Democratic Party to fall in line and try persuade the Social Democratic Party to give up its strong post-election opposition to another potential “grand coalition.” Whether this will aid Merkel’s coalition efforts remains to be seen.

The second scenario is a minority government led by the Christian Democratic Union. Unprecedented on the federal level in Germany and counterintuitive to the German preference for stability, this option would require Merkel’s Christian Democratic Union and its sister party, the Christian Social Union, to form a government with either the Green Party or the Free Democratic Party, the very party that just walked away from the talks. Both options lack a majority in the Bundestag and would depend on votes from other parties to pass legislation. In an interview, Merkel seemed skeptical about this option. The German population is with her on that one as only 29 percent are in favor of this unprecedented scenario

This leaves Germany with a third scenario, namely holding new elections. With 63 percent of German citizens supporting this idea, this may seem the most likely outcome. However, unlike in many other Western democracies, the German constitution does not make this option straightforward, keeping the history of the unstable Weimar Republic in mind. It is a lengthy complicated process that also risks benefiting the far-right populist party Alternative für Deutschland. Merkel, on the other side, has carefully signaled her preference for this option.

Regardless of the outcome, for the time being, we will see a Germany that is inward focused and consumed with its domestic political affairs. Merkel’s ability to exert strong leadership in Europe and at the international stage has been hampered and will be limited since she will need to focus on forming a coalition or campaigning for new elections. The passive German leadership we have seen in the lead up to September’s elections, focused on managing issues but avoiding new initiatives, may thus continue for several months to come. German foreign policy is on autopilot and with it are pressing issues, such as Brexit, Russia and Ukraine. While this means no major changes, it also means zero initiatives from Berlin.

For the rest of the continent, the situation means that any European Union reform efforts will be put on the backburner for the time being. The election of French President Emmanuel Macron, earlier this year significantly raised the prospect of a strong French-German tandem on forging a deeper fiscal and political union. This momentum, however, is now dissipating and any negotiations, which were never going to be easy in the first place, will have to be shelved until possibly next spring. With elections for the European Parliament lurking around the corner in 2019, the window of opportunity for such crucial reform talks slowly but surely shrinks, making them even more complex.

At a time when Europe is struggling with the rise of populism across the continent, Germany has so far been a beacon of relative political calm. A return to the normal state of German politics seems distant, and we have to reconcile Germany’s “new normal.” A new government in Berlin will eventually emerge but for Europe this means that precious time and opportunity will be lost as we wait to find out its exact composition.

This article was originally published in the Hill.

About the Authors

Erik Brattberg

Former Director, Europe Program, Fellow

Erik Brattberg was director of the Europe Program and a fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace in Washington. He is an expert on European politics and security and transatlantic relations.

Viola Meyerweissflog

Former Research Assistant, Europe Program

Authors

Erik Brattberg
Former Director, Europe Program, Fellow
Erik Brattberg
Viola Meyerweissflog
Former Research Assistant, Europe Program
Political ReformEUWestern EuropeGermanyEuropeIran

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Taking the Pulse: Is the EU Ready for Rapprochement With the UK?

    Closer EU-UK ties could help address urgent European concerns. But is the EU ready for rapprochement with the United Kingdom?

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz, ed.

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Who Is Responsible for the Demise of the Russian Internet?

    The Russian state has opted for complete ideological control of the internet and is prepared to bear the associated costs.

      Maria Kolomychenko

  • Commentary
    Diwan
    A Military Balance Sheet in the U.S. and Israeli War With Iran

    In an interview, Jim Lamson discusses the ongoing regional conflict and sees an unclear picture when it comes to winners and losers. 

      Michael Young

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    France, Italy, and Spain Should Use Force in Lebanon

    Europe has been standing by while its Southern neighborhood is being redrawn by force. To establish a path to peace between Israel and Lebanon, it’s time for Europeans to get involved with hard power.

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Is Opposition to Online Restrictions an Inflection Point for the Russian Regime?

    After four years of war, there is no one who can stand up to the security establishment, and President Vladimir Putin is increasingly passive. 

      Tatiana Stanovaya

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Carnegie global logo, stacked
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NWWashington, DC, 20036-2103Phone: 202 483 7600
  • Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
  • Donate
  • Programs
  • Events
  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Contact
  • Annual Reports
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Government Resources
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.