• Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Global logoCarnegie lettermark logo
DemocracyIran
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Rhea Menon",
    "Sharanya Rajiv"
  ],
  "type": "other",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie India"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie India",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [
    "Security Studies"
  ],
  "regions": [
    "Asia",
    "India",
    "Russia",
    "China"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Foreign Policy"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

Other
Carnegie India

Reintegrating Central Asia: The Problem

The rise of China as an economic powerhouse in Asia, along with rapid globalization, has brought Central Asia back in the limelight as a bridge connecting the established markets of the West with the emerging markets of the East.

Link Copied
By Rhea Menon and Sharanya Rajiv
Published on Dec 1, 2019
Project hero Image

Project

Security Studies

India’s evolving role in regional and global security is shaped by complex dynamics. Experts in the Security Studies Program examine India’s position in this world order through informed analyses of its foreign and security policies, focusing on the relationship with China, the securitization of borders, and the geopolitics of the Indo-Pacific. 

Learn More

Source: Seminar

ONCE the epicentre of global trade, culture, and politics, Central Asia – composed of Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, and Turkmenistan – found itself isolated following the dissolution of the ancient Silk Road. However, in recent years, external powers have stepped up efforts to develop overland connectivity – from China’s Belt and Road Initiative to the European Union’s Connecting Europe and Asia Strategy 2018 as well as India’s renewed push for the International North-South Transport Corridor (INSTC), in partnership with Russia and Iran.

Located at the juncture between these initiatives, international interest in the region also focuses on its unrealized economic potential as well as security threats. The first draws from its vast natural resource wealth, particularly hydrocarbons and minerals, and demographic dividend, which could just as easily present challenges. The second relates to fears, within the region and among its neighbours, regarding Central Asia’s possible role as a conduit for instability, Islamist extremism, and illicit trade.

While Russia’s traditional dominance in the region has been enduring, the growing involvement of external powers presents it with difficulties. Russia’s direct control over the region lasted from the Tsarist conquest of Central Asia in the nineteenth century to the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, which resulted in the region’s independence. Since then Russian influence – political, military, and economic – in the region has been challenged twice. The first was when the US established military bases in the region to support its forces in Afghanistan, but this chapter came to a close with the US closing the last base in 2014. This was a result of America’s appetite for the Afghan war declining and the region aligning itself with Russia and China, the latter of which has now emerged as the second challenger.

The rise of China as an economic powerhouse in Asia, along with rapid globalization, has brought Central Asia back in the limelight as a bridge connecting the established markets of the West with the emerging markets of the East. On 7 September 2013, Chinese President Xi Jinping announced his ambitious project of rebuilding the Silk Road. With roots in the historic Silk Road, ‘Xi Jinping proposed that in order to make the economic ties closer, mutual cooperation deeper and space of development broader between the Eurasian countries, we can innovate the mode of cooperation and jointly build the “Silk Road Economic Belt” step by step to gradually form overall regional cooperation.’1 This announcement in Kazakhstan heralded the onset of China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). While this strategy includes various continental and maritime corridors, the strategic and economic importance of Central Asia in this project is undeniable.

Since the announcement of the BRI, Chinese investment in the region has been multi-layered. This has not only been limited to infrastructure projects, but also encompasses import substitution and digital connectivity. Beyond economic development, China is increasingly willing to adopt the role of a net security provider in the region.

As India continues to expand its foreign policy outreach, and is in the process of moving beyond its role as a South Asian power, Central Asia is the perfect avenue for India to take the lead with regard to development in the region. In 2018, Prime Minister Modi’s visit to Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan and Tajikistan marked India’s renewed interest in the region. Similarly, the introduction of India to the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) as well as the semi-operationalization of the INSTC, provide the impetus for both sides to work together. Reflecting a new coherent approach toward the region, both sides also held the first ever ‘India-Central Asia Dialogue’ earlier this year. These strides move beyond bilateral engagements to include a multilateral framework for strategic and economic cooperation.

Geography places Central Asia at the crossroads of these initiatives. To ensure their viability, given the region’s critical role, the republics must build on recent efforts – especially as Uzbekistan has been appointed Secretary General of the SCO – to resolve intra-regional disputes, and minimize physical and institutional barriers to integration in the region.

With contributors from various Central Asian nations and beyond, this issue of Seminar provides a selection of perspectives about the past, present, and future trajectory of Central Asia, and the growing role of external actors, particularly India, China, Russia, and the EU in this evolving and dynamic space.

This article was originally published in the Seminar.

Notes:

1. President Xi Jinping Delivers Important Speech and Proposes to Build a Silk Road Economic Belt with Central Asian Countries, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, China, https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/topics_665678/xjpfwzysiesgjtfhshzzfh_665686/t1076334.shtml

About the Authors

Rhea Menon

Rhea Menon is a research assistant at Carnegie India.

Sharanya Rajiv

Authors

Rhea Menon

Rhea Menon is a research assistant at Carnegie India.

Sharanya Rajiv
Foreign PolicyAsiaIndiaRussiaChina

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

  • Shipping port at dawn from above
    Commentary
    Emissary
    The U.S. Export-Import Bank Was Built for a Different Era. Here's How to Fix It.

    Five problems—and solutions—to make it actually work as a tool of great power competition.

      • Afren Akhter

      Afreen Akhter

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Russia Is Meddling for Meddling’s Sake in the Middle East

    The Russian leadership wants to avoid a dangerous precedent in which it is squeezed out of Iran by the United States and Israel—and left powerless to respond in any meaningful way.

      Nikita Smagin

  • Man speaking into two mics
    Commentary
    Emissary
    Three Scenarios for the Gulf States After the Iran War

    One is hopeful. One is realistic. One is cautionary.

      • Andrew Leber

      Andrew Leber, Sam Worby

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    The Fog of AI War

    In Ukraine, Gaza, and Iran, AI warfare has come to dominate, with barely any oversight or accountability. Europe must lead the charge on the responsible use of new military technologies.

      Raluca Csernatoni

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Will Hungary’s New Leader Really Change EU Policy on Russia and Ukraine?

    Orbán created an image for himself as virtually the only opponent of aid to Ukraine in the entire EU. But in reality, he was simply willing to use his veto to absorb all the backlash, allowing other opponents to remain in the shadows.

      Maksim Samorukov

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Carnegie global logo, stacked
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NWWashington, DC, 20036-2103Phone: 202 483 7600Fax: 202 483 1840
  • Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
  • Donate
  • Programs
  • Events
  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Contact
  • Annual Reports
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Government Resources
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.