Commentary
The recent record of citizen uprisings in autocracies spells caution for the hope that a new wave of Iranian protests may break the regime’s hold on power.
Thomas Carothers, McKenzie Carrier
Source: Getty
Article
At Last, Iraqi Lawmakers Agree on the 2010 Election Law
On December 6, 2009, the Iraqi parliament finally passed an election law for the 2010 elections. The law deals with the most controversial issues regarding the election.
Published on Dec 14, 2009
On Sunday, December 6, 2009, the Iraqi parliament finally passed an election law for the 2010 elections. The Presidency Council swiftly approved the measure, the result of sensitive negotiations among Iraq’s top legislators.
The most controversial issues were the distribution of parliamentary seats among provinces, and the number and distribution of minority and compensatory seats, which are apportioned to parties too small to win election in any single province, but that win a large enough share of the national vote to earn a seat in parliament.
- The 325-seat parliament will consist of 310 seats for the provinces, eight seats for minority groups, and seven compensatory seats.
- Provincial seats will be distributed on the basis of the 2005 Ministry of Trade’s population numbers (based on food ration cards), with 2.8% population growth added for all provinces.
- Iraqis living abroad will vote for representatives of their home provinces, with no special status attributed to them.
- Minority seats will be distributed as follows: five Christian seats will be contested within a single national district reserved for Christians. In addition, Yazidis will have one reserved seat in Nineveh, Saibis one in Baghdad, and Shabakis one in Nineveh.
- The seven remaining compensatory seats will be distributed among parties that fare well on the national level but do not gain any seats on the provincial level
| Province | 2005 Elections | 2010 Elections |
|---|---|---|
| Baghdad | 59 | 68 |
| Nineveh | 19 | 31 |
| Basra | 16 | 24 |
| Dhi Qar | 12 | 18 |
| Babil | 11 | 16 |
| Sulaymaniya | 15 | 17 |
| Anbar | 9 | 14 |
| Irbil | 13 | 14 |
| Diyala | 10 | 13 |
| Kirkuk | 9 | 12 |
| Salahaddin | 8 | 12 |
| Najaf | 8 | 12 |
| Wasit | 8 | 11 |
| Qadisiyah | 8 | 11 |
| Maysan | 7 | 10 |
| Dohuk | 7 | 10 |
| Karbala | 6 | 10 |
| Muthanna | 5 | 7 |
| Compensatory Seats | 45 | 15 |
| Total | 275 | 325 |
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
- When Do Mass Protests Topple Autocrats?
- The EU Needs a Third Way in IranCommentary
European reactions to the war in Iran have lost sight of wider political dynamics. The EU must position itself for the next phase of the crisis without giving up on its principles.
Richard Youngs
- The Architecture of Digital RepressionArticle
Internet service providers can facilitate internet access but also draconian control.
Irene Poetranto
- The Kremlin Is Destroying Its Own System of Coerced VotingCommentary
The use of technology to mobilize Russians to vote—a system tied to the relative material well-being of the electorate, its high dependence on the state, and a far-reaching system of digital control—is breaking down.
Andrey Pertsev
- Indian Americans Still Lean Left. Just Not as Reliably.Commentary
New data from the 2026 Indian American Attitudes Survey show that Democratic support has not fully rebounded from 2020.
- +1
Sumitra Badrinathan, Devesh Kapur, Andy Robaina, …
