• Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Global logoCarnegie lettermark logo
DemocracyIran
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Neil Partrick"
  ],
  "type": "commentary",
  "blog": "Sada",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "Middle East",
    "Yemen",
    "Gulf"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Security",
    "Military"
  ]
}
Attribution logo

Source: Getty

Commentary
Sada

The Saudi and Emirati Conundrum After Saleh

Since the death of Ali Abdullah Saleh, Saudi Arabia and the UAE are again trying to find a powerful figure in Yemen around whom they can both unite.

Link Copied
By Neil Partrick
Published on Dec 18, 2017
Sada

Blog

Sada

Sada is an online journal rooted in Carnegie’s Middle East Program that seeks to foster and enrich debate about key political, economic, and social issues in the Arab world and provides a venue for new and established voices to deliver reflective analysis on these issues.

Learn More

The December 4 Houthi ambush that killed their recent ally, former Yemeni president Ali Abdullah Saleh, has shaken up perceptions but done little to alter the fundamentals of the conflict in Yemen. This includes Saudi and Emirati policies for the country, which prior to Saleh’s death were beginning to converge on tactics but lacked a coherent strategy and objectives. The UAE had argued Saleh was the only person able to hold some version of the Yemeni state together. Without him the Saudis and the Emiratis will struggle all the more to reduce the territorial dominance of the Houthis in northern Yemen, and to do so swiftly and without further security, economic, and political costs.

For the Saudis, this means achieving peace, or at least relative calm, while setting back Iran’s gains sufficiently enough to save face. However, this will likely take some time, given that the Houthis control Sanaa, territory bordering Saudi Arabia, and the Red Sea port city of Hodeida—a vital access point for humanitarian relief and other essential supplies, even though the Saudi-led aerial and naval coalition periodically seals it off.  

The Saudis had begrudgingly accepted the UAE’s argument that there was little choice but to embrace Ali Abdullah Saleh, their former ally and more recent nemesis. This prompted the Saleh and Houthi forces, formerly aligned tactically, to fight for control of Sanaa and signed Saleh’s own death warrant. Saleh’s son Ahmed Ali, a man able to draw on his own supporters and his father’s within what remains of the state’s military apparatus, may be able to wreak revenge on the Houthis and affect the course of the war. The former president’s death seems to have given some impetus to the UAE-backed Yemeni ground forces who remain loyal to Ali Abdullah Saleh and, for the time being at least, to Ahmed Ali. These forces are seeking to take territory on the coastal route north from Aden to Hodeida and, following Ali Abdullah Saleh’s death, they seem to have air and naval support from the UAE to do so. 

While the Emiratis see few other choices for Yemeni allies, the Saudis are willing to consider a greater range of actors. Islah, the Yemeni version of the Muslim Brotherhood, has the allegiance of capable fighters in the north and can draw on tribal support as the Saleh clan does. While the Emiratis maintain their neuralgic opposition to Islah and to any manifestation of political Islam, the Saudis do not share this sentiment. Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, the de facto Saudi leader, met Islah’s leader, Mohammed al-Yidoumi, in Riyadh on December 14—after which Yidoumi praised what the Saudi-led coalition is doing in Yemen. This was the second time in a month Mohammed bin Salman had publicly met with the Islah leader, who had spent two years trying to re-establish Islah’s formerly good relationship with the kingdom. 

Current Saudi policy toward it, and Yemen in general, is in a state of flux, so much so that a Saudi ground invasion of the bordering Yemeni province of Saada, the Houthis’ heartland, cannot be ruled out.1 The Saudi Arabian National Guard (SANG) is scheduled to mobilize close to the Yemeni border by the end of the year. While SANG is, on balance, more likely to confine itself to limited incursions to secure the border, it is possible that Mohammed bin Salman, frustrated by an ongoing war, might eventually sidestep the perpetual Saudi quest for a reliable and capable Yemeni ally and use SANG to try to subdue the Houthis, which the Saudi army so disastrously failed to accomplish in 2009–10. However, in the short term, the Saudis will continue to hope that Yemenis can do the job for them. 

In addition to Ahmed Ali Saleh, Saudi Arabia is also still working with General Ali Mohsen al-Ahmar, Ali Abdullah Saleh’s former close military ally and currently Vice President to Abed Rabbo Mansour Hadi—whom Saudi Arabia officially backs as president and the Emiratis despair of. Ali Mohsen has long worked with Islah-allied as well as Salafi fighters. Saudi Arabia has for years considered Ali Mohsen a possible alternative Yemeni leader.

The Saudis are therefore backing two rivals in the Yemeni fight: Ahmed Ali and Ali Mohsen. The UAE is also divided, for while it backs Ahmed Ali’s forces in the north, it supports different Yemeni fighters in the south, from where it wants to expand northward to the province of Taiz, according to Yemeni media reports.2 Despite Emiratis’ aversion to political Islam, they seem to accept that some of these southern forces are Salafi—as long as they follow the “right” Salafism, the kind that is deeply entrenched in Emirati social mores. The Saudis are wary that Emirati backing for some southern secessionists will encroach on its own northern spheres of influence, but seem willing to double down on the UAE’s current enthusiasm for Ahmed Ali even though they judge Ali Mohsen more capable of commanding the powerful Yemeni nexus of Islamism and tribe. It is hard to imagine these two men aligning on much, although they could form a tactical alliance against the Houthis, a common enemy. 

Yet even if they formed a temporary pact and joined forces, neither Ahmed Ali nor Ali Mohsen has the means to take Sanaa yet. In the meantime, the UAE might provide their forces aerial and naval support to retake Hodeida, as they reportedly did when pro-Saleh forces retook the Red Sea city of al-Khoukha on December 7. By contrast, the Emiratis will likely not back attempts to retake the oil-rich northern inland province of Marib. To do so, the UAE would need significant military support and deal with unfavorable local politics. The Emiratis will work with seemingly pliable local elements, including some Salafis, but the territory’s tribal leadership has Islah connections.3

In short, both Saudi and Emirati policies in Yemen remain self-contradictory, and the two countries also continue to diverge over means and objectives. For as long as a single Yemen is viable, however, the Saudis seem committed to it, while the UAE remains ambivalent. How Yemen will be “liberated,” by whom, and who will subsequently have authority are questions to which the two ostensible Gulf allies have seemingly not yet worked out the answers—for themselves let alone their declared alliance.  

Neil Partrick is the editor and lead contributor to Saudi Arabian Foreign Policy: Conflict and Cooperation (IB Tauris, second edition forthcoming in February 2018). Follow him on Twitter @neilpartrick.


1. Interview with a Saudi writer, December 14, 2017.
2. “Yemen president tries to stop UAE-led force seizing Aden base,” BBC Monitoring, October 29, 2017.
3. Interview with Saudi analyst Jamal Khashoggi, December 12, 2017.

About the Author

Neil Partrick

Neil Partrick is the editor and lead contributor to Saudi Arabian Foreign Policy: Conflict and Cooperation (IB Tauris, 2016).

Neil Partrick

Neil Partrick is the editor and lead contributor to Saudi Arabian Foreign Policy: Conflict and Cooperation (IB Tauris, 2016).

SecurityMilitaryMiddle EastYemenGulf

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Sada

  • Commentary
    Sada
    Digital Dissent in Morocco: A Sociological Analysis of the Generation Z Movement

    From anime heroes to online gaming communities, Morocco’s Gen Z is building a new protest culture. What does this digital imagination reveal about youth politics, and how should institutions respond?

      Abdelilah Farah

  • Commentary
    Sada
    Duqm at the Crossroads: Oman’s Strategic Port and Its Role in Vision 2040

    In a volatile Middle East, the Omani port of Duqm offers stability, neutrality, and opportunity. Could this hidden port become the ultimate safe harbor for global trade?

      Giorgio Cafiero, Samuel Ramani

  • Commentary
    Sada
    Sub-Saharan African Migrants in Morocco: Security Concerns and the Test of Human Rights

    Is Morocco’s migration policy protecting Sub-Saharan African migrants or managing them for political and security ends? This article unpacks the gaps, the risks, and the paths toward real rights-based integration.

      Soufiane Elgoumri

  • Commentary
    Sada
    A House Divided: How Internal Power Struggles Shape Iraq’s Foreign Policy

    Iraq’s foreign policy is being shaped by its own internal battles—fractured elites, competing militias, and a state struggling to speak with one voice. The article asks: How do these divisions affect Iraq’s ability to balance between the U.S. and Iran? Can Baghdad use its “good neighbor” approach to reduce regional tensions? And what will it take for Iraq to turn regional investments into real stability at home? It explores potential solutions, including strengthening state institutions, curbing rogue militias, improving governance, and using regional partnerships to address core economic and security weaknesses so Iraq can finally build a unified and sustainable foreign policy.

      Mike Fleet

  • Commentary
    Sada
    The Role of E-commerce in Empowering Women in Saudi Arabia: Assessing the Policy Potential

    How can Saudi Arabia turn its booming e-commerce sector into a real engine of economic empowerment for women amid persistent gaps in capital access, digital training, and workplace inclusion? This piece explores the policy fixes, from data-center integration to gender-responsive regulation, that could unlock women’s full potential in the kingdom’s digital economy.

      Hannan Hussain

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Carnegie global logo, stacked
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NWWashington, DC, 20036-2103Phone: 202 483 7600Fax: 202 483 1840
  • Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
  • Donate
  • Programs
  • Events
  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Contact
  • Annual Reports
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Government Resources
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.