Commentary
Is Morocco’s migration policy protecting Sub-Saharan African migrants or managing them for political and security ends? This article unpacks the gaps, the risks, and the paths toward real rights-based integration.
Soufiane Elgoumri
{
"authors": [
"Sargis Simonyan"
],
"type": "commentary",
"blog": "Sada",
"centerAffiliationAll": "",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
],
"englishNewsletterAll": "",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "",
"programs": [],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"Palestine",
"Middle East"
],
"topics": [
"Foreign Policy",
"Political Reform"
]
}
Source: Getty
Commentary
The Palestinian Diaspora: Guardians of a Fragmented Cause
The Palestinian diaspora's growing disconnection from the PA, especially during the Gaza war, has sparked a crisis of legitimacy, leaving even its allies questioning its leadership.
By Sargis Simonyan
Published on Jan 9, 2025
The chasm between the Palestinian diaspora and the Palestinian Authority (PA) is no longer a subtle crack but a gaping void. Once the torchbearers of a shared national struggle, these two entities now stand worlds apart—alienated by years of institutional decay, failed leadership, and the slow-motion disintegration of the Palestinian state project. As bombs fell over Gaza and Palestinian civilians faced unimaginable suffering, the PA’s voice was conspicuously absent, drowned out by internal power struggles and global indifference. In this fractured landscape, one question looms large: Can the diaspora, unmoored from official leadership, become the cornerstone of a reimagined Palestinian national cause?
The Palestinian diaspora has long been the backbone of the national struggle, funding liberation movements, advocating on international platforms, and spearheading solidarity campaigns. During the Palestine Liberation Organization’s (PLO) zenith, exiled Palestinians united through transnational networks, amplifying their collective voice for self-determination. However, this cohesion has frayed. The erosion of trust in the PA—plagued by corruption, autocracy, and failed governance —has pushed the diaspora to redefine its role. With nearly 50 percent of Palestinians now living outside of Palestinian Territories, this global community has shifted course from state-building ambitions to grassroots mobilization and international advocacy, signaling both a rupture and a recalibration of its historical mission.
The gulf between the Palestinian diaspora and the PA is both a tragedy and a reckoning. The PA’s leadership failures are glaring: amid the Gaza war, the its disengaged response left even allies questioning its legitimacy. Frustration with President Mahmoud Abbas’s administration, tainted by autocracy and accused of embezzling public funds, has spurred protests in Ramallah and beyond. Rampant corruption and ineffective governance have eroded public trust. Surveys indicate that 87 percent of Palestinians perceive the PA as corrupt, and 78 percent want Abbas to resign. Meanwhile, power struggles between the PA in the West Bank and Hamas in Gaza have paralyzed governance—their infighting has fractured Palestinian unity, leaving no coherent leadership to represent a common cause.
In stark contrast, the diaspora has embraced dynamic (and often decentralized) activism. It has historically been instrumental in supporting the Palestinian cause through financial contributions, advocacy, and solidarity efforts. Initiatives like the Palestinian Youth Movement’s global campaigns on social media have galvanized popular support for Gaza, bypassing official channels. In recent years, Palestinian Americans have mobilized to raise record funds for Gaza amid humanitarian crises, with organizations like the Palestine Children’s Relief Fund and Anera witnessing unprecedented donation levels.
As the PA flounders, the Palestinian diaspora has stepped onto the global stage with unmatched vigor, shaping international policy and discourse. In the corridors of power, diaspora-led organizations like Americans for Justice in Palestine Action and the Institute for Middle East Understanding (IMEU) have reframed narratives on the Israeli occupation, often challenging entrenched narratives in Western media and lobbying governments to revisit decades-old policies on military aid to Israel.
Diaspora advocacy has kept the Palestinian right of return alive in global discourse. The UK-based Palestinian Return Centre, for instance, has campaigned relentlessly for refugee rights, gaining special consultative status with the UN Economic and Social Council in 2015. Meanwhile, the Global Campaign to Return to Palestine, operating across forty-five countries, drives worldwide events to ensure the issue remains on the international agenda. These efforts ensure the right of return remains not just a memory but a movement.
Momentum for change is already building. The Palestinian Popular Campaign’s call to democratize the PLO represents a turning point. A unified leadership, working hand in hand with an empowered diaspora, could transform disjointed activism into a formidable force for justice. Anything less risks leaving Palestine’s future as fragmented as its present.
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Sada
- Sub-Saharan African Migrants in Morocco: Security Concerns and the Test of Human Rights
- A House Divided: How Internal Power Struggles Shape Iraq’s Foreign PolicyCommentary
Iraq’s foreign policy is being shaped by its own internal battles—fractured elites, competing militias, and a state struggling to speak with one voice. The article asks: How do these divisions affect Iraq’s ability to balance between the U.S. and Iran? Can Baghdad use its “good neighbor” approach to reduce regional tensions? And what will it take for Iraq to turn regional investments into real stability at home? It explores potential solutions, including strengthening state institutions, curbing rogue militias, improving governance, and using regional partnerships to address core economic and security weaknesses so Iraq can finally build a unified and sustainable foreign policy.
Mike Fleet
- The Role of E-commerce in Empowering Women in Saudi Arabia: Assessing the Policy PotentialCommentary
How can Saudi Arabia turn its booming e-commerce sector into a real engine of economic empowerment for women amid persistent gaps in capital access, digital training, and workplace inclusion? This piece explores the policy fixes, from data-center integration to gender-responsive regulation, that could unlock women’s full potential in the kingdom’s digital economy.
Hannan Hussain
- A War Fueled by Hate Speech: Sudan’s Fall into FragmentationCommentary
Hate speech has spread across Sudan and become a key factor in worsening the war between the army and the Rapid Support Forces. The article provides expert analysis and historical background to show how hateful rhetoric has fueled violence, justified atrocities, and weakened national unity, while also suggesting ways to counter it through justice, education, and promoting a culture of peace.
Samar Sulaiman
- Disarming Palestinian Factions in Lebanon: Can a Security Experiment Evolve into Sovereign Policy?Commentary
The August 2025 government decision to restrict weapons to the Lebanese state, starting with Palestinian arms in the camps, marked a major test of Lebanon’s ability to turn a long-standing slogan into practical policy. Yet the experiment quickly exposed political hesitation, social gaps, and factional divisions, raising the question of whether it can become a model for addressing more sensitive files such as Hezbollah’s weapons.
Souhayb Jawhar
