Amr Hamzawy
{
"authors": [
"Amr Hamzawy"
],
"type": "legacyinthemedia",
"centerAffiliationAll": "",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Carnegie Europe",
"Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center"
],
"collections": [
"Arab Awakening"
],
"englishNewsletterAll": "",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "",
"programs": [],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"North Africa",
"Egypt",
"Middle East"
],
"topics": [
"Political Reform"
]
}Source: Getty
Egypt: At a Crucial Moment, Road Map Toward Democracy
As Egypt hovers on threshold of transition toward democratic governance, the current regime has an opportunity to administer a peaceful transition of power by responding to the demands of the Egyptian people.
Source: Commentary

Egyptian citizens are bravely overcoming attempts by some to incite fear with chaos. The popular will to change has not wavered. Rather, the people have persisted with a clear, collective and frank expression of their desire to oust the current regime and create a democratic, free and just nation.
The matter has been decided and the clock’s hands will not turn back to the time of authoritarianism.
Egypt stands today assuredly on the threshold of transition toward democratic governance. Egyptians are now demanding the realization of swift national consensus regarding the method of this transition and its administration.
Given the choice of the military to cooperate both with the people and the existing government, the regime has an opportunity right now to administer a safe transition toward democracy. Such a transition could prevent Egypt from a dragged-out confrontation between the prevailing popular will to change and the desire of some power-players in the current regime to resist it.
A peaceful transition of power is dependent on the current regime responding to the demands Egyptians are raising:
- Form a national unity government based on genuine participation to administer the country’s affairs. Civilians of every stripe, affiliation and creed must be brought together alongside military officers to develop a new form of governance. Likewise, political leaders must be seen as credible in the eyes of their constituents. The military must also commit to its full support of the unity government during a transition period not to exceed six months.
- Dissolve the current parliament. Representation in both the upper and lower chambers lost any semblance of legitimacy following the rigged electoral processes of 2010. A constituent assembly — not an expert commission — should be formed. It should encompass all aspects of Egyptian society to include legal experts, representatives of every political ideology, academics, writers and other independent thinkers. If such an assembly is created and President Mubarak commits to refraining from a repeated run for the presidency, his era can end with dignity.
- Amend constitutional articles 76 and 77 to allow for open candidacy in the presidential elections and to limit presidential terms to two. A round of amendments from 2007 moved progress toward fair electoral processes backward, and they must be either reversed or modified. Furthermore, any change to the Constitution or government must uncompromisingly protect equal rights of both Muslims and Copts, as well as the secular nature of the Egyptian state.
- Immediately terminate emergency law and remove all restraints on civil and political liberties. Namely, the laws regulating political parties, the exercise of political rights, and the activities of civil society organizations must be either abolished or rewritten. Freedoms of expression and organization must be constitutionally guaranteed. With such assurances, the citizens who have been engaged in this uprising will have a legitimate stake in the transition. The bickering among the opposition over who speaks for the Egyptian street is now over. With this opening of political space, true communication is possible between citizens and the spectrum of political forces, as well as with the elites.
- Hold accountable all those involved in corruption and violence against peaceful protesters. The judiciary must commit to bringing to justice all members of the regime who have enriched themselves at the expense of the Egyptian people. Citizens participating now in the creation of Egypt’s democratic present must understand, however, that taking such action may not affect all those who are guilty. The essential point here is to set in place sufficient legal and political guarantees to avoid the repetition of such crimes both today and in the future.
The moment for the military to administer a secure transition toward democracy and guarantee a dignified exit for President Mubarak is now. It is time to open the door of political life wide to the plethora of Egypt’s political players so that all may compete to represent the will of the people. What Egyptian citizens are accomplishing in this moment in history is magnificent. Yet, the clock is still ticking and time is running short. It is hoped that the military, with all its patriotism, will seize this opportunity and avoid the potential dangers posed by a volatile transition to democracy. Any other alternative could cost Egypt dearly.
About the Author
Director, Middle East Program
Amr Hamzawy is a senior fellow and the director of the Carnegie Middle East Program. His research and writings focus on governance in the Middle East and North Africa, social vulnerability, and the different roles of governments and civil societies in the region.
- Iran Is Pushing Its Neighbors Toward the United StatesCommentary
- U.S. Peace Mediation in the Middle East: Lessons for the Gaza Peace PlanPaper
Amr Hamzawy, Sarah Yerkes, Kathryn Selfe
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
- Digital Dissent in Morocco: A Sociological Analysis of the Generation Z MovementCommentary
From anime heroes to online gaming communities, Morocco’s Gen Z is building a new protest culture. What does this digital imagination reveal about youth politics, and how should institutions respond?
Abdelilah Farah
- Taking the Pulse: Is it NATO’s Job to Support Trump’s War of Choice?Commentary
Donald Trump has demanded that European allies send ships to the Strait of Hormuz while his war of choice in Iran rages on. He has constantly berated NATO while the alliance’s secretary-general has emphatically supported him.
Rym Momtaz, ed.
- After Ilia II: What Will a New Patriarch Mean for Georgia?Commentary
The front-runner to succeed Ilia II, Metropolitan Shio, is prone to harsh anti-Western rhetoric and frequent criticism of “liberal ideologies” that he claims threaten the Georgian state. This raises fears that under his leadership the Georgian Orthodox Church will lose its unifying role and become an instrument of ultraconservative ideology.
Bashir Kitachaev
- The Problem With the Idea That Netanyahu Made Trump Attack IranCommentary
Going to war was the U.S. president’s decision, for which he alone is responsible.
Daniel C. Kurtzer, Aaron David Miller
- The Diverging U.S. and Israeli Goals in Iran Are Making the Endgame Even MurkierCommentary
The cracks between Trump and Netanyahu have become more pronounced, particularly over energy and leadership targets.
Eric Lob