A Criteria-Based Approach to Nuclear Cooperation With Pakistan

{
  "authors": [
    "Toby Dalton",
    "Mark Hibbs",
    "George Perkovich"
  ],
  "type": "other",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie Europe",
    "Carnegie China"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "NPP",
  "programs": [
    "Nuclear Policy"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "South Asia",
    "Pakistan",
    "East Asia",
    "China",
    "Asia"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Nuclear Policy",
    "Nuclear Energy",
    "Arms Control",
    "Security"
  ]
}

Other

A Criteria-Based Approach to Nuclear Cooperation With Pakistan

The Fukushima nuclear disaster in Japan provides Beijing with an opportunity to pause and contemplate conditioning its nuclear cooperation with Pakistan on improvements in nuclear safety and security.

By Toby Dalton, Mark Hibbs, George Perkovich

Published on Jun 22, 2011

In the wake of the Fukushima nuclear disaster, Beijing decided to review its plans for expanding nuclear power in China. It appears likely that China will shift its ambitious nuclear construction program away from older designs to modern technology provided by foreign vendors.

Although there are no indications that China is reconsidering its decision to build two additional nuclear power reactors in Pakistan—which are based on technology Beijing will probably abandon domestically—the accident in Japan provides Beijing with an opportunity to pause and contemplate conditioning its cooperation with Pakistan on improvements in nuclear safety and security. During such a pause, Beijing could consider the possibility of developing within the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG) a criteria-based approach to nuclear cooperation with states lacking full-scope safeguards (FSS). This strategy would be invoked irrespective of other discussions about future NSG membership and criteria that might be considered in that context.

A criteria-based approach would provide a roadmap for states without FSS, including Pakistan, to qualify for civil nuclear cooperation, thus placing China’s current and future nuclear cooperation with Pakistan in an NSG process. The lynchpin in this approach is incentivizing China through the licensing of foreign reactor technology, so that China sees greater economic potential in achieving its longer-term ambition of becoming a nuclear exporter than in its shorter-term deals with Pakistan. Such an approach could help resolve persistent questions about the NSG’s future, which were raised by the U.S.-India nuclear deal and by Russia’s previous nuclear commerce with India. This strategy thus has the potential to resolve this issue in a way that strengthens the NSG, provides China with incentives to reconsider its cooperation with Pakistan, and gives Pakistan the international legitimacy it desperately seeks.

About the Authors

Toby Dalton

Senior Fellow and Co-director, Nuclear Policy Program

Toby Dalton is a senior fellow and co-director of the Nuclear Policy Program at the Carnegie Endowment. An expert on nonproliferation and nuclear energy, his work addresses regional security challenges and the evolution of the global nuclear order.

Mark Hibbs

Nonresident Senior Fellow, Nuclear Policy Program

Hibbs is a Germany-based nonresident senior fellow in Carnegie’s Nuclear Policy Program. His areas of expertise are nuclear verification and safeguards, multilateral nuclear trade policy, international nuclear cooperation, and nonproliferation arrangements.

George Perkovich

Japan Chair for a World Without Nuclear Weapons, Senior Fellow

George Perkovich is the Japan Chair for a World Without Nuclear Weapons and a senior fellow in the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace’s Nuclear Policy Program. He works primarily on nuclear deterrence, nonproliferation, and disarmament issues, and is leading a study on nuclear signaling in the 21^st century.

Nuclear Policy Nuclear Energy Arms Control Security South Asia Pakistan East Asia China Asia

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

Paper
Time for Nuclear Recycling? Prospects and Implications During a Global Nuclear Energy Renewal
Nuclear recycling has emerged as a salient, cross-cutting issue, one that is heavily dependent on broader choices among reactor designs, fuel availability, economic resources, technological options, and political choices. States and nuclear industries seeking to advance recycling must devote sustained consideration now to the interplay of all these factors.
Etienne Pochon
Commentary
Carnegie Politika
Russia’s Elite Conflict Over Internet Restrictions Does Not Herald Regime Collapse
A much-discussed disagreement over internet restrictions in Russia was never an existential threat for Putin: It was about elite groups protecting their interests.
Alexandra Prokopenko
Article
Managing Divergence: India’s BRICS Presidency in 2026
This piece argues that India’s central challenge is not managing a single flashpoint but resolving the underlying tension between expansion and institutional coherency of the BRICS grouping.
Vrinda Sahai
Commentary
Emissary
Trump’s AI Order Won’t Stymie U.S. Competition with China
Beijing regulated AI—and then Chinese AI companies took off.
Matt Sheehan
Paper
Beyond the Hype: Assessing Hyperscaler Nuclear Commitments Against U.S. Energy Realities
The coming decade will require technology companies to decide how nuclear fits into their energy strategies—and grapple with the obligations that follow.
John Pendleton, Mackenzie Schuessler

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

Nuclear power plant reactor under construction

Paper

Time for Nuclear Recycling? Prospects and Implications During a Global Nuclear Energy Renewal

Nuclear recycling has emerged as a salient, cross-cutting issue, one that is heavily dependent on broader choices among reactor designs, fuel availability, economic resources, technological options, and political choices. States and nuclear industries seeking to advance recycling must devote sustained consideration now to the interplay of all these factors.

Etienne Pochon

Commentary

Carnegie Politika

Russia’s Elite Conflict Over Internet Restrictions Does Not Herald Regime Collapse

A much-discussed disagreement over internet restrictions in Russia was never an existential threat for Putin: It was about elite groups protecting their interests.

Alexandra Prokopenko

Article

Managing Divergence: India’s BRICS Presidency in 2026

This piece argues that India’s central challenge is not managing a single flashpoint but resolving the underlying tension between expansion and institutional coherency of the BRICS grouping.

Vrinda Sahai

Trump and Bessent sitting next to each other

Commentary

Emissary

Trump’s AI Order Won’t Stymie U.S. Competition with China

Beijing regulated AI—and then Chinese AI companies took off.

Matt Sheehan

Nuclear power plants and solar panels in California

Paper

Beyond the Hype: Assessing Hyperscaler Nuclear Commitments Against U.S. Energy Realities

The coming decade will require technology companies to decide how nuclear fits into their energy strategies—and grapple with the obligations that follow.

John Pendleton, Mackenzie Schuessler