• Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Global logoCarnegie lettermark logo
DemocracyIran
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Thomas de Waal"
  ],
  "type": "commentary",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie Europe",
    "Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Europe",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "Russia",
    "Eastern Europe",
    "Ukraine",
    "Western Europe"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Political Reform",
    "Democracy",
    "Foreign Policy",
    "Civil Society"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

Commentary
Carnegie Europe

An East-West Gay Rights Divide

Not only in Russia where ideologists use the issue of homosexual rights as a dividing line between the East and the West, but in some other post-communist states as well the European agenda on gay and lesbian rights is not shared by the majority of population.

Link Copied
By Thomas de Waal
Published on Dec 18, 2013

Not free trade, not democracy. Who could have guessed that the big ideological dividing line Russian ideologists are drawing between East and West would be homosexuality?

New words have entered the Russian political lexicon. Pro-western opposition leaders are described as “liberasti,” a combination of the words “liberal” and “pederast.” And anti-EU activists are claiming that the Euromaidan is actually a “Euro-Sodom.”

The marginal fringe of this group portrays Europe as a scary place where the state abducts your children and no longer permits usage of the words “mommy” and “daddy.”

The mainstream, led by the new-old media-darling of Russian patriotic television, Dmitry Kiselev, is more sarcastic. Kiselev publicly mocked the (openly gay) German Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle, saying that when he met the opposition brothers, boxers Vitali and Wladimir Klitschko, in Kiev, he was “heated and maybe overheated by the bodies of the heavyweights.”

The divide is genuine. A recent article by Michael Lipka of the Pew Research Center presents a map of attitudes to gay rights that runs more or less down the line of the old Iron Curtain (although Greece and the Czech Republic fall on the other side).

Citing a Pew survey from 2010, Lipka records responses across Europe to the statement, “Gay men and lesbians should be free to live their own lives as they wish.” West European countries, headed by the Netherlands, Sweden, and Denmark, are at the top of the list, with 89 percent or more of respondents approving the statement.

Down at the bottom are Ukraine and Russia, with only 28 and 25 percent respectively respecting gay rights.

Westerners who fight for gay rights should take this seriously. While not giving up the struggle, they should reflect that you will not make much progress if in these countries (or in parts of Alabama or Oklahoma for that matter) you just use the same discourse that you use at home.

Two other findings from the same poll give more food for thought. One is that the traditionally Catholic Spain has undergone a massive generational change—80 percent of Spaniards approved that statement. The second is that the third lowest response, on a par with Ukraine, was in another traditionally Catholic country, Lithuania.

Lithuania however, is a member of the European Union and NATO. It can be assumed that many Ukrainians will also “choose Europe” without fully sharing the European agenda on gay and lesbian rights.

About the Author

Thomas de Waal

Senior Fellow, Carnegie Europe

Thomas de Waal is a senior fellow at Carnegie Europe, specializing in Eastern Europe and the Caucasus.

    Recent Work

  • Commentary
    There Is No Shortcut for Europe in Armenia

      Thomas de Waal

  • Article
    Rewiring the South Caucasus: TRIPP and the New Geopolitics of Connectivity
      • Areg Kochinyan

      Thomas de Waal, Areg Kochinyan, Zaur Shiriyev

Thomas de Waal
Senior Fellow, Carnegie Europe
Thomas de Waal
Political ReformDemocracyForeign PolicyCivil SocietyRussiaEastern EuropeUkraineWestern Europe

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

  • Pashinyan shaking hands
    Commentary
    Emissary
    At Stake in Armenia’s Election: Peace and Russian Influence

    Regardless of the outcome, there’s another path to ensuring that progress doesn’t stall.

      Zaur Shiriyev

  • Photo of a person's hands holding a Hungarian voting card with a Hungarian flag tablecloth in the background.
    Article
    Civic Mobilization to Defend Electoral Integrity in Hungary

    An innovative grassroots civic initiative helped defend the integrity of Hungary’s recent elections, with significant impact on the results and positive lessons for other contexts of democratic backsliding.

      • Photo of Hanna Folsz.

      Hanna Folsz

  • Commentary
    Emissary
    Trump and Xi Are Angling for Three Years of Stability

    But their "principal to principal" model will only be as effective as the political strength of each leader back home.

      • Damien Ma

      Damien Ma

  • Recruit polices vow as they join in the police at Beijing Public Security Bureau on February 18, 2011 in Beijing, China. (
    Paper
    China’s Police and Security Cooperation Agreements

    China’s Ministry of Public Security is often portrayed as a domestic law enforcement agency, but it is also a global security actor. This paper explores how MPS has used international law enforcement and security cooperation agreements—over 200 since 2006—to advance China’s vision of security in a changing global environment.  

      • Sheena Chestnut Greitens

      Sophie Zhuang, Sheena Chestnut Greitens, Cameron Waltz

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Could Migrants From India and Africa Solve Russia’s Labor Shortage?

    The demands of the Kremlin’s war in Ukraine, demographic problems, and public hostility toward Central Asians mean Russia does not have enough workers.  

      Salavat Abylkalikov

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Carnegie global logo, stacked
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NWWashington, DC, 20036-2103Phone: 202 483 7600
  • Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
  • Donate
  • Programs
  • Events
  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Contact
  • Annual Reports
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Government Resources
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.