Commentary
It’s dangerous to dismiss Washington’s shambolic diplomacy out of hand.
Eric Ciaramella
{
"authors": [
"Lina Khatib"
],
"type": "other",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "menaTransitions",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center",
"programAffiliation": "MEP",
"programs": [
"Middle East"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"Levant",
"Syria",
"Middle East"
],
"topics": [
"Political Reform",
"Security",
"Foreign Policy"
]
}
Source: Getty
Syrians in Their Neighborhood: Regional Crisis, Regional Solutions
There is lack of will to be decisive about the conflict in Syria and a staggering lack of understanding, especially on the part of Western donors, of what is actually happening on the ground.
By Lina Khatib
Published on Mar 13, 2014
Source: Issam Fares Institute for Public Policy and International Affairs
When it comes to the regional dimension of the Syrian crisis, we are “dealing with a new Middle East cold war with different actors in the region with their own rivalries, mainly Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and Iran,” said Carnegie’s Lina Khatib during a symposium on the Syrian refugee crisis at the American University of Beirut Issam Fares Institute for Public Policy and International Affairs.
Khatib said that the conflict is being viewed through a “black and white framework” by international actors, especially regarding the roles of Iran and Russia who are “sticking to a hardline position that they will not budge on.”
“To think that diplomatic talks such as Geneva are going to be the solution is actually very simplistic,” argued Khatib, because to reach any solution requires a complicated comprehensive strategy for a complicated conflict. Khatib added that there is still a “lack of will to be decisive about the conflict and there is a staggering lack of understanding, especially on the part of Western donors, of what is actually happening on the ground.”
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
- What If Trump Gets His Russia-Ukraine Deal?
- Taking the Pulse: Can the EU Attract Foreign Investment and Reduce Dependencies?Commentary
EU member states clash over how to boost the union’s competitiveness: Some want to favor European industries in public procurement, while others worry this could deter foreign investment. So, can the EU simultaneously attract global capital and reduce dependencies?
Rym Momtaz, ed.
- What Can the EU Do About Trump 2.0?Article
Europe’s policy of subservience to the Trump administration has failed. For Washington to take the EU seriously, its leaders now need to combine engagement with robust pushback.
Stefan Lehne
- To Survive, the EU Must SplitCommentary
Leaning into a multispeed Europe that includes the UK is the way Europeans don’t get relegated to suffering what they must, while the mighty United States and China do what they want.
Rym Momtaz
- In Uzbekistan, the President’s Daughter Is Now His Second-in-CommandCommentary
Having failed to build a team that he can fully trust or establish strong state institutions, Mirziyoyev has become reliant on his family.
Galiya Ibragimova
