• Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Global logoCarnegie lettermark logo
DemocracyIran
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "C. Raja Mohan"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie India"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie India",
  "programAffiliation": "SAP",
  "programs": [
    "South Asia"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "South Asia",
    "India"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Foreign Policy",
    "Nuclear Policy"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media
Carnegie India

Raja-Mandala: Delhi’s New Diplomatic Chutzpah

India’s Nuclear Suppliers Group diplomacy reveals a new level of self-assurance that can explore the space for accommodation in all directions.

Link Copied
By C. Raja Mohan
Published on Jun 21, 2016
Program mobile hero image

Program

South Asia

The South Asia Program informs policy debates relating to the region’s security, economy, and political development. From strategic competition in the Indo-Pacific to India’s internal dynamics and U.S. engagement with the region, the program offers in-depth, rigorous research and analysis on South Asia’s most critical challenges.

Learn More

Source: Indian Express

This week marks a major “multilateral moment” in Indian diplomacy as Delhi joins an Asian regional forum and pitches hard for the membership of an international nuclear club. The multilateral advance, however, is founded on some bold bilateral diplomacy.

In Tashkent this week, the paper work for India’s membership of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation, a forum that brings China, Russia and the Central Asian states together is likely to be completed. In another corner of Asia in Seoul, South Korea, the members of the Nuclear Suppliers Group may deliberate on India’s application for membership. Joining these two organisations has long been a major diplomatic objective for India. The campaign for SCO membership has moved at a steady pace in the last many years. However, the final play for the NSG has been more recent and very demanding.

In the expansive dialogue between Delhi and Washington after the second round of nuclear tests in May 1998, India put special emphasis on removing the international restrictions on high technology exports that had accumulated since the mid 1970s.

Following the historic civil nuclear initiative between India and the US during 2005-08, President Barack Obama, during the visit to India in November 2010, endorsed India’s claim for membership of the four export control groups — the Nuclear Suppliers Group, the Missile Technology Control Regime, the Australia Group that seeks to prevent chemical weapon production and the Wassenaar Arrangement that regulates trade in conventional weapons and dual use items.

India’s aspiration to become a full member of the global nuclear management was the logical next step to the civil nuclear initiative that had ended the prolonged international nuclear blockade against India. But the UPA government’s delay in implementing the civil nuclear initiative meant there would be no progress on the membership of these forums.

As the government of Narendra Modi removed the last hurdles in the implementation of the nuclear initiative, it also renewed the effort for entry into the four export control regimes. Earlier this month, the path was cleared for the membership of MTCR. All eyes are now on its NSG campaign.

It is not quite clear if the NSG meeting this week will come up with a definitive decision on India’s application. While a formal decision welcoming India into the NSG will be a huge achievement, even a negative or non-decision will not detract from India’s high-octane diplomatic campaign.

The need for unanimity in the NSG for admitting India, China’s openly expressed reservations, the widespread temptation to link India’s membership with a signature on the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty and the inevitable hyphenation of India with Pakistan were all big obstacles.

Instead of being deterred, Delhi chose to up the stakes and raise its game. It fielded President Pranab Mukherjee to make a direct appeal to President Xi Jinping during his visit to China last month. The PM showed up in Geneva and Mexcio City to persuade the political leadership of Switzerland and Mexico to ease their reservations against India’s application to join the NSG. He also picked up the phone to talk to some key leaders like Russia’s Vladimir Putin. The external affairs minister, Sushma Swaraj, personally spoke to 23 counterparts among the members of the NSG.

The diplomatic effort called for an effective management of the Pakistan question that continues to complicate India’s bilateral and multilateral diplomacy on the regional and world stage. The NSG campaign involved getting simultaneous Western and Russian support at a time when relations between the two have deteriorated and India is warming up to America.

It also demanded a sophisticated balancing act between the US, India’s main supporter in the nuclear campaign, and China, the principal problem. Many in Delhi have argued that drawing close to the US and asking China at the same time to lift its hold on India’s membership of the NSG was a bit of bravado.

But Delhi’s new diplomatic chutzpah is about ending the kind of political diffidence that underlined India’s traditional approach to the great powers. Delhi’s NSG diplomacy reveals a new level of self-assurance that can explore the room for accommodation in all directions rather than hide behind the slogan of non-alignment and do nothing.

Many have argued that the net benefit for India from membership of the NSG is rather little. After all, India is now free to engage in civil nuclear commerce under the exemption that the NSG had provided Delhi in 2008. But as Sushma Swaraj put it in her Sunday press conference, there is a big difference between sitting outside a room seeking the indulgence of others and being inside and making the nuclear rules.

Call it what you will, Indian diplomacy is shaking off its traditional risk aversion, trading potential favours, exercising leverages and bargaining for productive outcomes. Whether it wins in Seoul this week or not, Delhi has demonstrated that it has the political will to play hard ball on issues of high national interest.

This article originally appeared in the Indian Express.

About the Author

C. Raja Mohan

Former Nonresident Senior Fellow, Carnegie India

A leading analyst of India’s foreign policy, Mohan is also an expert on South Asian security, great-power relations in Asia, and arms control.

    Recent Work

  • Article
    Deepening the India-France Maritime Partnership

      C. Raja Mohan, Darshana M. Baruah

  • Commentary
    Shanghai Cooperation Organization at Crossroads: Views From Moscow, Beijing and New Delhi
      • Alexander Gabuev
      • +1

      Alexander Gabuev, Paul Haenle, C. Raja Mohan, …

C. Raja Mohan
Former Nonresident Senior Fellow, Carnegie India
Foreign PolicyNuclear PolicySouth AsiaIndia

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

  • Article
    Continental Asia and the Rise of Portfolio Politics

    “Central Asia” as an analytical category is itself part of the problem. The term is a Soviet administrative inheritance, drawn along lines that served the convenience of Moscow. The Central Asian states the Soviets named no longer see themselves through this category alone and are not aligning across political blocs but are instead building external partnerships sector by sector, assigning different partners to different functions.

      Jennifer B. Murtazashvili

  • Members of the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) attend a meeting along with Bhartiya Janta Party (BJP) President Amit Shah and Indian designated Prime Minister Narendra Modi (C) at the central hall of the parliament, in New Delhi on May 25, 2019.
    Paper
    Delimitation After Defeat: India’s Unfinished Debate Over Representation

    The battle over representation and regional power has been delayed—not resolved—and will shape the future of India’s federal balance.

      • Louise Tillin
      • Andy Robaina

      Louise Tillin, Milan Vaishnav, Andy Robaina

  • Commentary
    The Unresolved Challenges in U.S.–India Semiconductor Cooperation

    The U.S.–India semiconductor cooperation story is well-stocked with top-level strategic intent. What remains unresolved, however, are some underlying challenges that will determine whether the cooperation actually functions. Three such friction points stand out.

      Shruti Mittal

  • Commentary
    Diwan
    Corrupted by Absolute Power

    In an interview, Marc Lynch discusses his new book decrying the post-1990 U.S.-dominated order in the Middle East.

      Michael Young

  • Tiananmen Gate with US and Chinese flags
    Commentary
    Emissary
    Trump and Xi Should Tackle a Previously Impossible AI Conversation

    Previous dialogues ended in failure. This time could be different.

      Scott Singer

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Carnegie global logo, stacked
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NWWashington, DC, 20036-2103Phone: 202 483 7600
  • Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
  • Donate
  • Programs
  • Events
  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Contact
  • Annual Reports
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Government Resources
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.