• Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Global logoCarnegie lettermark logo
DemocracyIran
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Arushi Kumar"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie China",
    "Carnegie India"
  ],
  "collections": [
    "Belt and Road Initiative"
  ],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie India",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "Asia",
    "South Asia",
    "Afghanistan",
    "India",
    "East Asia",
    "China"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Economy",
    "Foreign Policy"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media
Carnegie India

Why China’s One Belt, One Road Matters for Afghanistan

By deepening its political, economic and military engagement in Afghanistan, and by formally signing a Memorandum of Understanding in 2016, China seems to be emerging as a long-term player in the region’s new Great Game.

Link Copied
By Arushi Kumar
Published on May 12, 2017

Source: South Asian Voices

As the Belt and Road Forum for International Cooperation takes place in Beijing this weekend, a high-level delegation from Kabul will be in attendance with the hope of hastening the implementation of many infrastructure projects in Afghanistan. China has already become the large source of foreign direct investment in Afghanistan, especially after Afghanistan’s energy, minerals, and raw material sector opened up in 2007. It is also concerned about quelling the rise of extremism from Uighur jihadists in the Xinjiang region that shares a border with Afghanistan. Finally, the success of the One Belt, One Road (OBOR) initiative is contingent upon lasting peace and stability in the region. By deepening its political, economic and military engagement in Afghanistan, and by formally signing an OBOR Memorandum of Understanding in 2016, China seems to be emerging as a long-term player in the region’s new Great Game.

The OBOR is the lynchpin of China’s geo-economic strategy to expand China’s extra-regional influence and resolve its Malacca Dilemma. To achieve this, Beijing is reorienting access to Middle Eastern energy resources by comprehensively linking Eurasia through a network of railways and highways. Afghanistan seeks to benefit by pinning its hopes on China to develop its infrastructure and connectivity after being ravaged by decades of war.

China has taken significant steps to develop the OBOR initiative. The New Silk Road Fund of $40 billion, the China Development Bank’s $900 billion and a substantial share of the Asia Infrastructure Investment Bank’s $100 billion is expected to support 900 projects across 60 countries. OBOR’s offshoot, the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor, has also drawn Chinese investments of over $62 billion. Any instability emanating from neighboring Afghanistan would limit Beijing’s expansive infrastructural and connectivity ambitions.

Chinese economic aid to Afghanistan has increased significantly since OBOR was launched in 2013. China provided Afghanistan with approximately $240 million in aid over twelve years between 2001 and 2013. In contrast, in 2015, it pledged to provide $327 million by the end of 2017. Beijing also offered 500 scholarships to Afghan students to study in China and train 3000 Afghans in various professions including counterterrorism and agriculture. Further, China is investing in a housing project worth $300 million that will fund 10,000 apartments in Kabul. As a part of OBOR, China is also improving its own connectivity to Afghanistan. The first train from China was linked to Hairatan in northern Afghanistan via Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan. By investing in railways, China is also weaving land-locked Afghanistan into an integrated economic system and reducing its dependence on transit routes through Pakistan.

Beijing and Kabul’s security cooperation has been limited, but this is rapidly changing. Beijing offered military aid to Afghanistan for the first time in 2016. Afghan President Ashraf Ghani and General Fang Fenghui, chief of China’s joint staff department, also discussed expanding security cooperation, for which Afghanistan is reportedly interested in logistical equipment, light weapons, aircraft components, military uniforms, and ammunition for the Afghan National Defense and Security Forces. Despite official denial of the presence of Chinese troops within Afghan borders, Afghanistan and China have reportedly started joint patrols in Little Pamir in northeastern Afghanistan. Both countries will also hold a joint counterterrorism exercise involving the Afghan Special Forces in China this year.

Sino-Afghan diplomatic relations have deepened conspicuously since 2014. Ghani chose to visit China on his first official overseas visit as president. Beijing also hosted the Heart of Asia Conference in 2014, which sought to expand cooperation between Afghanistan and its neighbors. Following multiple interactions between high-level diplomatic and military delegations, China and Afghanistan also signed several significant bilateral cooperation agreements in China last year.

China’s ambitious project of regional connectivity through Central Asia is conditioned on sustained stability in Afghanistan. It has facilitated peace talks between the Afghan government and the Taliban since 2014, stating that it believes reconciliation through negotiations is the best way to ensure lasting peace, and was part of the Quadrilateral Coordination Group (QCG). Despite the failure of the QCG, Afghanistan continues to look to China to assert influence over Pakistan to bring the Taliban to the negotiating table.

The Chinese Ambassador to Afghanistan, Yao Jing has said: “Without Afghan connectivity, there is no way to connect China with the rest of the world.” China is using all means at its disposal to protect long-term economic interests in Afghanistan, while increasing its security presence to prevent extremists from fomenting unrest in the neighboring Xinjiang region. Kabul, in turn, hopes OBOR will help Afghanistan accelerate economic growth, emerge as a hub of regional trade, and overcome internal security threats.

This article was originally published in South Asian Voices.

About the Author

Arushi Kumar

Arushi Kumar
EconomyForeign PolicyAsiaSouth AsiaAfghanistanIndiaEast AsiaChina

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

  • Person pointing and shouting while holding a protest sign against the Ebola facility
    Commentary
    Emissary
    The Bigger Problem with the U.S.-Kenya Ebola Deal

    Washington’s transactional foreign policy is making it indistinguishable from Beijing’s, with consequential implications for African agency.

      Jane Munga

  • Abstract of AI
    Article
    Early Lessons in the Pursuit of Sovereign AI

    As the experiences of India and the UAE suggest, attaining complete sovereignty is unrealistic for most nations. But that doesn’t mean they must depend on the United States or China.

      Shreya Joshi

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Belarus Is a Test Case for Ukraine’s New Role in the Region

    Ukraine’s increasingly confrontational posture on Belarus reflects Kyiv’s effort to shape the emerging regional order in Eastern Europe. Kyiv wants to limit European normalization with Minsk—and any future rapprochement with Russia.

      Balázs Jarábik

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    France and Germany Need Their Own Situation Room

    The Franco-German relationship is on the rocks again. But unlike previous moments of tension, the epochal changes on the world stage require that both step up investment in their bilateral ties.

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz

  • Europe trade economy container supply chains
    Paper
    From Trade Dependence to Geopolitical Leverage: The EU in an Era of Weaponized Interdependence

    As geopolitical rivalry weaponizes global supply chains, the EU’s true vulnerability lies in emerging-risk imports. For these goods, suppliers are growing more concentrated, substitution more difficult, and political risk is looming.

      Sinan Ülgen

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Carnegie global logo, stacked
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NWWashington, DC, 20036-2103Phone: 202 483 7600
  • Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
  • Donate
  • Programs
  • Events
  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Contact
  • Annual Reports
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Government Resources
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.