• Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Global logoCarnegie lettermark logo
DemocracyIran
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Kenji Kushida"
  ],
  "type": "other",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [
    "Startup Japan",
    "Innovative Japan, Global Japan"
  ],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "asia",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "AP",
  "programs": [
    "Asia"
  ],
  "projects": [
    "Startup Japan"
  ],
  "regions": [
    "East Asia",
    "Japan"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Economy",
    "Technology"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

Other

Startup Japan: Series Overview

Japan's startup ecosystem, which grew as a relatively peripheral segment of Japan’s economy throughout much of its recent history, is now front and center in getting attention from the government and big business.

Link Copied
By Kenji Kushida
Published on Aug 9, 2022
Program mobile hero image

Program

Asia

The Asia Program in Washington studies disruptive security, governance, and technological risks that threaten peace, growth, and opportunity in the Asia-Pacific region, including a focus on China, Japan, and the Korean peninsula.

Learn More
Startup Japan

Project

Startup Japan

Japan’s startup ecosystem is critical to the country’s future. It injects much-needed flexibility and dynamism into Japan’s rigid postwar social structures and an economy dominated by large firms. Japan’s startup ecosystem will influence the technological and strategic trajectories that large firms and much of the economy pursue.

Learn More

Series Overview

Startup Japan is a multipart series covering Japan’s rapidly maturing startup ecosystem. In the government’s June 7, 2022, announcement of its new economic strategy, Kishida Fumio's administration included an aggressive vision for Japan’s startup ecosystem—a goal to increase the number of startups tenfold over the next five years. It is also set to use part of its $1.5 trillion pension fund, the world’s largest, to provide venture capital financing to boost the startup ecosystem.

So what is the status of Japan’s startup ecosystem, and what is the best way to go about understanding it? While the conventional wisdom and dominant narrative outside Japan—and to many inside Japan—is that Japan’s startup ecosystem is small, failing, or insignificant, the pieces in this series demonstrate that Japan’s startup ecosystem has actually spent years maturing and is currently on track to play a significant role in Japan’s political economy.

However, the role of Japan’s startup ecosystem will not be the same as that of Silicon Valley in the U.S. economy. In the United States, venture-capital-financed, fast-growth startups displaced and disrupted countless industries and incumbent large firms to become a pillar of the entire economy, venture capital became a critical component of the U.S. innovation system, and Silicon Valley produced many of the world’s most highly valued and cash-rich firms. Japan’s large firms are unlikely to be displaced by its startups. Instead, given that Japan’s political economy has suffered from rigidity and inflexibility, now that startups are partnering with large firms in various ways and enjoying social legitimacy of levels unseen in at least the past sixty years, Japan’s startup ecosystem can play a vital role in injecting flexibility, influencing the trajectory of large firms, and providing a much-needed venue for dynamism and growth.

This new framing is solidly supported by a wide range of evidence and company case studies, but since the conventional wisdom about Japan’s “small” startup ecosystem is predominant in most existing analyses and common narratives, a short, simple analysis will not suffice. Hence, this series will cover multiple aspects of Japan’s startup ecosystem in digestible chunks.

Of course, there is still much work to be done to further develop Japan’s startup ecosystem, and there are helpful measures the Japanese government can take. The U.S. government can also be helpful in this regard. It is critical, however, that a proper framing of startup ecosystems and their various components underlie the policy discussions.

In sum:

  • Japan’s rapidly maturing startup ecosystem can play a vital role in influencing the trajectory of Japan’s political economy toward a path of greater dynamism and growth.
  • Startup ecosystems are one of the important areas of U.S.-Japan cooperation. Growing Japan’s domestic startup ecosystem is also a policy priority for the Kishida administration, outlined explicitly in Japan’s economic growth strategy.
  • Japan’s startup ecosystem has matured dramatically over the past two decades, but problems with how it is framed and understood have caused it to be underestimated and often dismissed as small and insignificant by many observers of Japan both inside and outside the country. This is a waste, making it even more difficult to attract international partners and support within Japan.
  • Japan’s startup ecosystem is small compared to the United States’ in Silicon Valley, but not notably smaller than those of many other G7 countries in absolute terms.
  • Japan’s startup ecosystem shouldn’t be expected to replace the core of Japanese industry, displacing major incumbent firms. Instead, the international community should look for collaboration between large incumbent firms and startups that causes incumbents to shift direction and try new things that they would not otherwise. Japan’s challenge has been the inflexibility of its large firms, and the startup ecosystem adds flexibility.
  • Building startup ecosystems takes time, and Japan’s startup ecosystem has grown up alongside its large-firm-dominated core for the past twenty years, with each of its components maturing over time.
  • Looking at the challenges ahead should not detract from appreciating the accomplishments of the past twenty years.
  • There are many reasons to believe that Japan’s startup ecosystem is poised for rapid growth. Most importantly, the underlying components of the ecosystem now enjoy positive feedback loops of growth, also known as virtuous cycles.
  • The social legitimacy of Japan’s startup ecosystem is at a level not seen for at least sixty years, opening up opportunities for its growth to accelerate.

This research is based on over ten years of research on Japan’s startup ecosystem, gathering data and following developments, companies, people, governments, and regulations as they evolved.

At the base of every discussion about startup ecosystems needs to be a conception of what their main components are, and how these components fit together. The conception here, based on the Silicon Valley model, involves several main components that depend upon one another, as each component develops over time to experience the positive feedback loops of development that are needed for the component to become self-sustaining.

Components Underlying Startup Ecosystems

InstitutionSilicon Valley Model
1) FinanceVenture capital
2) Labor marketDynamic, highly educated, top talent from around the world
3) University-government-industry tiesMultifaceted, conducive to forming and growing new companies
4) Industry organizationSymbiosis of large firms and startups, intense competition
5) Social norms surrounding entrepreneurshipCelebration of entrepreneurs and startup ecosystem
6) Professional services supporting startup ecosystemProfessional services supporting startup ecosystem, numerous venues for startups and collaboration
Source: Kenji Kushida, “Departing From Silicon Valley: Japan’s New Startup Ecosystem,” in Reinventing Japan: New Directions in Global Leadership, ed. Martin Fackler and Yoichi Funabashi (Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO, 2018), 81–102.

Each part of this series will take a deeper dive into one of the components, as well as introducing the model itself.

Parts of this series:

  • Overview and snapshot of Japan’s startup ecosystem
  • Understanding startup ecosystems: their components and complementarities
  • Japan’s venture capital industry
  • Labor mobility
  • University-industry relations
  • Government support
  • Large firm–startup symbiosis
  • Social legitimacy of startup ecosystem
  • Startup ecosystem support businesses

About the Author

Kenji Kushida

Senior Fellow, Asia Program

Kenji Kushida is a senior fellow in Carnegie’s Asia Program, primarily directing research on Japan along the theme of Innovative Japan, Global Japan, including the new Japan-Silicon Valley Innovation Initiative@Carnegie.

    Recent Work

  • Article
    Is Takaichi Japan’s Future?

      Kenji Kushida

  • Article
    What Awaits Japan’s Next Prime Minister

      Kenji Kushida

Kenji Kushida
Senior Fellow, Asia Program
Kenji Kushida
EconomyTechnologyEast AsiaJapan

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

  • Servers
    Article
    The Geopolitical Debates Over Controlling Cloud Compute

    If U.S. policymakers continue down the path of restricting China’s access to frontier AI, they will eventually have to implement some sort of restriction on cloud access.

      Noah Tan

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Could the Iran War Push Japan to Restore Russian Oil Imports?

    Tokyo would have to surmount a lot of obstacles—not least Western sanctions—if it wanted to return Russian oil imports to even modest pre-2022 volumes.

      Vladislav Pashchenko

  • Aerial view of Chernobyl damage
    Commentary
    Emissary
    Chernobyl Is Still a Current Event, Forty Years Later

    The 1986 incident showed that a nuclear accident anytime is a nuclear accident for all time.

      Corey Hinderstein

  • Article
    From Labor Scarcity to AI Society: Governing Productivity in East Asia

    The debate over AI and work too often centers on displacement. Facing aging populations and shrinking workforces, East Asian policymakers view AI not as a threat, but as a cross-sectoral workforce strategy.

      Darcie Draudt-Véjares, Sophie Zhuang

  • Article
    Governing AI in the Shadow of Giants: Korea’s Strategic Response to Great Power AI Competition

    In its version of an AI middle power strategy, Seoul is pursuing alignment with the United States not as an endpoint but as a strategy to build industrial and geopolitical leverage. Whether this balance holds remains an open question.

      Darcie Draudt-Véjares, Seungjoo Lee

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Carnegie global logo, stacked
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NWWashington, DC, 20036-2103Phone: 202 483 7600
  • Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
  • Donate
  • Programs
  • Events
  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Contact
  • Annual Reports
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Government Resources
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.