• Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Global logoCarnegie lettermark logo
DemocracyIran
  • Donate
Militant Attack on Tsentoroi Village

Source: Getty

Article
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center

Militant Attack on Tsentoroi Village

The militant attack on Chechen President Ramzan Kadyrov’s home village has shown the vulnerability of the Kadyrov regime, which is commonly considered the most successful in the North Caucasus and quite capable of guaranteeing stability.

Link Copied
By Alexey Malashenko
Published on Aug 30, 2010

The recent militant attack on Chechen President Ramzan Kadyrov’s home village of Tsentoroi was something out of the ordinary. It is true that the North Caucasus has already been linked to a number of sensational terrorist attacks this year, including two presidential assassination attempts (against both Kabardino-Balkaria President Arsen Kanokov and Kadyrov), the blasts at the Baksan Hydroelectric Power Station, and the Moscow metro bombings. However, this latest attack strikes a blow at the very heart of the Caucasus vertical power structure. 

What does this upsurge in violence mean and where does it stem from?

First of all, no significant changes have taken place in the region since the decisions to create a separate North Caucasus Federal District and appoint successful manager Alexander Khloponin to oversee it.

Second, the opposition has become even more active and its attacks even more painful than was the case, say, two years ago.

The militants continue to suffer losses, and Caucasus Emirate – considered the most powerful, even if numerically small, Islamist group in the region – suffers from internal contradictions. However, they still have a good margin of support. The “bandits,” as the authorities like to call them, have shown once again that whatever one calls them – terrorists, extremists, wahhabites – they are anything but common criminals. 

Third, simply counting the number of militants killed, captured, or abandoning the struggle makes it clear that they number not just mere dozens, but hundreds or even thousands. This is because they are constantly receiving fresh blood, and they have the sympathy of a fair share of the local population. Local politicians and the authorities in Moscow indirectly admit this with their increasingly frequent attempts to intimidate the “accomplices of the bandits” – that is to say, people who give the militants passive assistance.

Fourth, the Islamists are spreading their activities over an increasingly large territory. Kabardino-Balkaria, which was still relatively stable not long ago, is looking more and more like Ingushetia. Experts warn of possible destabilization in Karachayevo-Cherkessia, where the “Cherkessian” factor is becoming more and more prominent, provoked by the decision to organize the 2014 Olympics on the site of Cherkessian burial grounds.  

Fifth, the attack on Tsentoroi has shown the vulnerability of the Kadyrov regime, which many consider the most successful in the North Caucasus and quite capable of guaranteeing stability. However, the attack proved that Kadyrov’s reliance on use of force alone as a tactic does not work. It seems that Kadyrov himself is beginning to understand this, as he recently decided to reach an agreement with his opponents from the Yamadayev clan, the second most influential clan in Chechnya.

Sixth, the almost synchronous attacks by militants in different North Caucasian republics demonstrate that the federal counterterrorist strategy in the North Caucasus is not working and, despite some success, will not accomplish the task of establishing and maintaining stability in the region.

Seventh, in a natural response to the upsurge in militant activity, some Caucasus politicians, in particular Dagestani leader Magomedsalam Magomedov, have proposed establishing their own military units made up of selected local people, arguing that only local inhabitants can fight with success in the mountains and forests. The federal authorities appear quite receptive to this idea. However, the formation of such units risks tipping the balance toward civil war. 

Eighth, it is obvious that social and economic problems – such as creating jobs, building modern infrastructure, and developing a big tourism cluster (a project for which 480 billion roubles have been allocated) – can be resolved only if political problems are settled. These political problems are manifold – lack of confidence in the authorities (both local and federal), corruption, and ineffective laws, just to name a few. Such problems are the main obstacle towards economic development and modernization, without which the Caucasus region has no future.  

But it seems for now as though Moscow, where there has been so much talk about the need to develop the regional economy and make real progress in the social sector, has not yet started thinking seriously about the political aspect of life in the North Caucasus.

About the Author

Alexey Malashenko

Former Scholar in Residence, Religion, Society, and Security Program

Malashenko is a former chair of the Carnegie Moscow Center’s Religion, Society, and Security Program.

    Recent Work

  • Commentary
    What Will Uzbekistan’s New President Do?

      Alexey Malashenko

  • Commentary
    Preserving the Calm in Russia’s Muslim Community

      Alexey Malashenko

Alexey Malashenko
Former Scholar in Residence, Religion, Society, and Security Program
Alexey Malashenko
CaucasusRussiaPolitical ReformDomestic Politics

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Taking the Pulse: Is France’s New Nuclear Doctrine Ambitious Enough?

    French President Emmanuel Macron has unveiled his country’s new nuclear doctrine. Are the changes he has made enough to reassure France’s European partners in the current geopolitical context?

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz, ed.

  • Heavily armed security personnel standing atop an armored vehicle
    Commentary
    Emissary
    When Do Mass Protests Topple Autocrats?

    The recent record of citizen uprisings in autocracies spells caution for the hope that a new wave of Iranian protests may break the regime’s hold on power.

      • McKenzie Carrier

      Thomas Carothers, McKenzie Carrier

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    The EU Needs a Third Way in Iran

    European reactions to the war in Iran have lost sight of wider political dynamics. The EU must position itself for the next phase of the crisis without giving up on its principles.

      Richard Youngs

  • High-tech data center with server racks
    Article
    The Architecture of Digital Repression

    Internet service providers can facilitate internet access but also draconian control.

      Irene Poetranto

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Why Are China and Russia Not Rushing to Help Iran?

    Most of Moscow’s military resources are tied up in Ukraine, while Beijing’s foreign policy prioritizes economic ties and avoids direct conflict.   

      • Alexander Gabuev

      Alexander Gabuev, Temur Umarov

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Carnegie global logo, stacked
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NWWashington, DC, 20036-2103Phone: 202 483 7600Fax: 202 483 1840
  • Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
  • Donate
  • Programs
  • Events
  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Contact
  • Annual Reports
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Government Resources
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.