Article
Nathan J. Brown
{
"authors": [
"Nathan J. Brown"
],
"type": "legacyinthemedia",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center"
],
"collections": [
"Arab Awakening"
],
"englishNewsletterAll": "menaTransitions",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "MEP",
"programs": [
"Middle East"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"North Africa",
"Egypt"
],
"topics": [
"Political Reform",
"Security",
"Democracy",
"Military",
"Civil Society",
"Foreign Policy"
]
}
Source: Getty
In The Media
Egyptian Government Imposes Strict Anti-Terrorism Law
A new Egyptian antiterrorism law took effect this week, and to call it tough is an understatement.
Published on Aug 18, 2015
Source: NPR’s All Things Considered
NPR's Robert Siegel interviews Nathan Brown, a nonresident Senior Associate at the Carnegie Endowment and a professor at George Washington University, about the constitutionality of the law and the concern it will be used to crackdown on political dissent.
ROBERT SIEGEL, HOST: In Egypt this week, a new antiterrorism law took effect, and to call it tough is an understatement. Belonging to a group designated a terrorist entity is an offense that could lead to 10 years in prison. Financing such a group could bring 25 years in prison, forming one is punishable by death, and terrorism cases would be heard in special courts. Reporters who contradict the authorities' version of a terror attack could be fined up to $25,000. Nathan Brown is a political scientist and Middle East specialist at the George Washington University. Welcome to the program once again.
NATHAN BROWN: Thanks for having me.SIEGEL: You're familiar with Egyptian law and the Egyptian constitution. By Egyptian standards, is this law constitutional?
BROWN: Well, that will be for the constitutional court to decide. And the problem is, it will take a long time for any case to find its way to the court. There are certainly aspects of the law that could be challenged on constitutional grounds, but there's going to be an awful lot of activity that can be prosecuted before that point.
SIEGEL: Give us a sense of the context in which President el-Sisi has promulgated this law.
BROWN: Well, there certainly has been an upsurge of political violence in Egypt, and some of that can be considered terrorism. The government really feels it has to be tough and it has to send a very strong message. And President el-Sisi himself has said that one of the problems is that the courts are just too slow in handling it and the judiciary needs to step up to the plate and really prosecute terrorism.
SIEGEL: Egypt is engaged in a counterinsurgency against a militant Islamist group in the northern Sinai, and I know that group is regarded as a terrorist entity by the authorities. Is the Muslim Brotherhood, which won Egypt's first free election, is that also regarded as a terrorist entity?
BROWN: Not by most observers, no. There are certainly members of the Brotherhood who have engaged in political violence, but certainly as an organization as a whole does not have a terrorist record in recent decades.
SIEGEL: But could this law be invoked against the Muslim Brotherhood?
BROWN: Oh, absolutely. Some of its provisions seem to be really designed in order to paint the definition of terrorism so broadly that the Brotherhood could very much find itself targeted.
SIEGEL: Since the Arab Spring, we've gone from the old regime of President Mubarak to the Muslim Brotherhood President Mohammed Morsi, who was ousted, and now President General el-Sisi. How do things today compare with the old days in Egypt?
BROWN: Well, in some ways it may be a re-creation not of the old regime under Mubarak, but a little bit more of that that existed in the '60s under Nasser. It's a little bit more authoritarian. Also, under Mubarak, the country and the regime did care about the international reputation of Egypt. This new regime seems basically to be undertaking actions that give Egypt a black eye internationally and doesn't really seem to care.
SIEGEL: Do you think that President Sisi and this new law generally enjoy the support of the average Egyptian?
BROWN: It's very, very difficult to say what the average Egyptian thinks because the space for politics and political expression has been so severely constrained. What I would say is that you're beginning to hear some intellectuals and some political activists complain a little bit about the regime's conduct. But it is still the case that in terms of public debate in Egypt, most of it still seems to be supportive of the president.
SIEGEL: Do you get the sense that it's having a chilling effect on journalists in Egypt - independent journalists?
BROWN: This law in particular will probably have a little bit of that effect, but the climate since the overthrow of Morsi in 2013 has been so intolerant of dissident voices, and there have been enough journalists who have been blamed for, in essence, encouraging terrorism, reporting false news and so on, and there have been some who have been arrested and some even killed, that I think what this new law will be will be a drop in the bucket to what is already a fairly restrictive environment for journalism.
SIEGEL: Professor Brown, thanks for talking with us today.
BROWN: Thanks for having me.
SIEGEL: Nathan Brown, a professor of political science at the George Washington University in Washington, D.C.
This interview was originally held on NPR's All Things Considered.
About the Author
Nathan J. Brown
Nonresident Senior Fellow, Middle East Program
Nathan J. Brown, a professor of political science and international affairs at George Washington University, is a distinguished scholar and author of nine books on Arab politics and governance, as well as editor of five books.
- For Younger Palestinians, Crisis Has Become a Way of Life
- The Perils of the Palestinian Authority’s New Party LawCommentary
Nathan J. Brown
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
- The Unintended Consequences of German DeterrenceResearch
Germany's sometimes ambiguous nuclear policy advocates nuclear weapons for deterrence purposes but at the same time adheres to non-proliferation. This dichotomy can turn into a formidable dilemma and increase proliferation pressures in Berlin once no nuclear protector is around anymore, a scenario that has become more realistic in recent years.
Ulrich Kühn
- India’s Foreign Policy in the Age of PopulismPaper
Domestic mobilization, personalized leadership, and nationalism have reshaped India’s global behavior.
Sandra Destradi
- When Do Mass Protests Topple Autocrats?Commentary
The recent record of citizen uprisings in autocracies spells caution for the hope that a new wave of Iranian protests may break the regime’s hold on power.
Thomas Carothers, McKenzie Carrier
- The EU Needs a Third Way in IranCommentary
European reactions to the war in Iran have lost sight of wider political dynamics. The EU must position itself for the next phase of the crisis without giving up on its principles.
Richard Youngs
- Resetting Cyber Relations with the United StatesArticle
For years, the United States anchored global cyber diplomacy. As Washington rethinks its leadership role, the launch of the UN’s Cyber Global Mechanism may test how allies adjust their engagement.
Patryk Pawlak, Chris Painter
