The North Korea Nuclear Crisis: A Strategy for Negotiations

{
  "authors": [
    "Michael D. Swaine",
    "Alan Romberg"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "asia",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "AP",
  "programs": [
    "Asia"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "North America",
    "United States",
    "East Asia",
    "South Korea",
    "China",
    "Japan",
    "Caucasus",
    "Russia",
    "North Korea"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Security",
    "Military",
    "Foreign Policy",
    "Nuclear Policy",
    "Nuclear Energy"
  ]
}

In The Media

The North Korea Nuclear Crisis: A Strategy for Negotiations

If the United States, China, South Korea, Japan and Russia can reach a basic understanding on how to handle North Korea, the effort to convince Pyongyang to abandon its nuclear weapons program and accept a reasonable "more-for-more" agreement, while not easy, should enjoy a reasonable chance of success.

By Michael D. Swaine and Alan Romberg

Published on May 6, 2003

Source: Arms Control Today

The entire article can be read in Arms Control Today May 2003.

About the Authors

Michael D. Swaine

Former Senior Fellow, Asia Program

Swaine was a senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and one of the most prominent American analysts in Chinese security studies.

Alan Romberg

Alan Romberg is distinguished fellow and the director of the East Asia program at the Stimson Center. Before joining Stimson he served for 27 years in the U.S. Department of State, with over 20 years as a Foreign Service officer.

Security Military Foreign Policy Nuclear Policy Nuclear Energy North America United States East Asia South Korea China Japan Caucasus Russia North Korea

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

Commentary
China Financial Markets
Is China’s High-Quality Investment Output Economically Viable?
China’s rapid technological progress and its first-rate infrastructure are often cited as refuting the claim that China has been systematically overinvesting in non-productive projects for many years. In fact, as the logic of overinvestment and the many historical precedents show, the former is all-too-often consistent with the latter.
Michael Pettis
Commentary
Carnegie Politika
The Much-Touted Middle Corridor Transport Route Could Prove a Dead End
For the Middle Corridor to fulfill its promises, one of these routes must become scalable. At present, neither is.
Friedrich Conradi
Article
The Iran War Shows the Limits of U.S. Power
If Washington cannot adapt to the ongoing transformations of a multipolar world, its superiority will become a liability.
Amr Hamzawy
Commentary
Diwan
Where is the Groundwork for Lebanon’s Negotiations With Israel?
A prerequisite of serious talks is that the country’s leadership consolidates majority national support for such a process.
Michael Young
Commentary
Strategic Europe
The EU Equivocating on Turkey Is Bad Geopolitics
Following Ursula von der Leyen’s gaffe equating Turkey to Russia and China, relations with Ankara risk deteriorating even further. Without better, more consistent diplomatic messaging, how can the EU pretend to be a geopolitical power?
Sinan Ülgen

The North Korea Nuclear Crisis: A Strategy for Negotiations

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

Commentary

China Financial Markets

Is China’s High-Quality Investment Output Economically Viable?

China’s rapid technological progress and its first-rate infrastructure are often cited as refuting the claim that China has been systematically overinvesting in non-productive projects for many years. In fact, as the logic of overinvestment and the many historical precedents show, the former is all-too-often consistent with the latter.

Michael Pettis

Commentary

Carnegie Politika

The Much-Touted Middle Corridor Transport Route Could Prove a Dead End

For the Middle Corridor to fulfill its promises, one of these routes must become scalable. At present, neither is.

Friedrich Conradi

Article

The Iran War Shows the Limits of U.S. Power

If Washington cannot adapt to the ongoing transformations of a multipolar world, its superiority will become a liability.

Amr Hamzawy

Commentary

Diwan

Where is the Groundwork for Lebanon’s Negotiations With Israel?

A prerequisite of serious talks is that the country’s leadership consolidates majority national support for such a process.

Michael Young

Commentary

Strategic Europe

The EU Equivocating on Turkey Is Bad Geopolitics

Following Ursula von der Leyen’s gaffe equating Turkey to Russia and China, relations with Ankara risk deteriorating even further. Without better, more consistent diplomatic messaging, how can the EU pretend to be a geopolitical power?

Sinan Ülgen