Paper
Yezid Sayigh
{
"authors": [
"Yezid Sayigh"
],
"type": "other",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center"
],
"collections": [
"Arab Awakening"
],
"englishNewsletterAll": "menaTransitions",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center",
"programAffiliation": "MEP",
"programs": [
"Middle East"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"Levant",
"Syria",
"Middle East"
],
"topics": [
"Political Reform",
"Security"
]
}
Source: Getty
Syria’s Age of Revolution: Peaceful Protest to Armed Struggle
The nature of the Syrian revolution is particularly complex. A deeper social reading on Syria is required to further understand the violence in Syria and the importance of its timing during the Arab uprisings.
By Yezid Sayigh
Published on Jan 13, 2014
Source: London School of Economics and Political Science
“The nature of what’s going on in Syria—the Syrian revolution—is so particularly complex,” said Carnegie’s Yezid Sayigh during a public lecture at the London School of Economics and Political Science. Sayigh reflected upon the notion of “revolution” as a framework to “understand the nature and the strengths and weaknesses of the protagonists – both the regime and its various foes.”
Noting parallels with other historical experiences, such as the beginning of Palestinian activism, Sayigh explained the importance of social dynamics in Syria: “the sort of discourse we get and the sort of reporting we get on which a lot of policy is built is about good and bad…tyrannical regime versus democratic opposition, moderates versus radical Islamists.” Sayigh noted that it’s not necessarily wrong, but that “this kind of reporting, it doesn’t really tell us what is going on in Syria and certainly not enough to understand where things are going, and why they’ve gone where they are, and why we keep seeming to be surprised about where things have gone.”
Sayigh emphasized the importance of a social reading on Syria, explaining that “had there not been an Arab Spring...the Syrian revolution—the uprising—probably wouldn’t have started just in that time, in that way.” Additionally, by looking at violence of the armed struggle, including “who wields violence, how it’s wielded, what for, with what discourse, that, I think, tells us more about the nature of the Syrian revolution.”
This conference was recorded and hosted by the London School of Economics and Political Science.
About the Author
Yezid Sayigh
Senior Fellow, Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center
Yezid Sayigh is a senior fellow at the Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center in Beirut, where he leads the program on Civil-Military Relations in Arab States (CMRAS). His work focuses on the comparative political and economic roles of Arab armed forces, the impact of war on states and societies, the politics of postconflict reconstruction and security sector transformation in Arab transitions, and authoritarian resurgence.
- Egypt’s Military Landlord Economy and its Limitations
- What Is Israel’s Plan in Lebanon?Commentary
Yezid Sayigh
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
- Control Above Reform: What’s Behind Ukraine’s Government and Security Reshuffle?Commentary
Ultimately, Zelensky sided neither with the reform camp nor with the military establishment as such, but with political control.
Balázs Jarábik
- What We Know About the U.S.-Saudi Nuclear DealCommentary
Despite the agreement’s uncertainty, it’s still a significant development in regional and nuclear policy.
Andrew Leber, Jane Darby Menton
- Where Are President Tokayev’s Political Reforms Leading Kazakhstan?Commentary
Tokayev’s predecessor, Nursultan Nazarbayev, outlined arrangements for a power transition too soon and in too much detail, ultimately losing control over the process. Tokayev is determined not to meet the same fate.
Temur Umarov
- Why Russia Could Escalate Hybrid Warfare Against EuropeCommentary
Mounting economic strain and battlefield losses will not necessarily make the Kremlin less dangerous. They could instead push Moscow toward a more aggressive hybrid campaign designed to test NATO’s Eastern flank, exploit allied hesitation, and fracture European resolve.
Maksym Beznosiuk
- Taking the Pulse: Enough with the Annual NATO Summits, Already?Commentary
Over the past ten years, NATO has held almost as many summits as it did during the entirety of the Cold War. Are they still useful, or is it time to stop holding annual meetings?
Rym Momtaz, ed.
