• Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Global logoCarnegie lettermark logo
Democracy
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Petr Topychkanov"
  ],
  "type": "commentary",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "North America",
    "United States",
    "East Asia",
    "China",
    "Southeast Asia"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Security",
    "Military",
    "Global Governance",
    "Foreign Policy"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

Commentary
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center

MH370 Challenge for Asia-Pacific Security

Two weeks search for the missing Malaysia Airlines plane was an example of both impressive regional cooperation and discouraging limits of such cooperation in the Asia-Pacific region.

Link Copied
By Petr Topychkanov
Published on Mar 24, 2014

Two weeks search for the missing Malaysia Airlines plane was an example of both impressive regional cooperation and discouraging limits of such cooperation in the Asia-Pacific region.

On the one hand, it is the largest search operation in the history. On March 20 Malaysian authorities mentioned 29 planes and 6 helicopters, 18 ships, and 21 satellites, involved in the search. During previous days the operations facilities amounted to more than 50 planes and 40 ships of 26 countries. China alone used the data from about 20 satellites. The total area of the operation had reached 7.7 million square kilometers. The search for the missing plane has become a top priority for many countries, including China and the United States.

On the other hand, the search operation demonstrated a number of problems in the field of regional cooperation:

  • Inability to rapidly and cooperatively response to the disappearance of the MH370;
     
  • Poor coordination of the international search operation, making some countries to drop out of it;
     
  • Reluctance to share data from intelligence services and armed forces with Malaysian authorities;
     
  • Delays in use of whole range of available sources, including the information from the satellite operators;
     
  • Lack of ability of regional countries to monitor their air space and territorial waters;
     
  • Unveiled concern of some regional countries about significant military deployment of China in the framework of the search operation.

Two weeks ago it seemed that the Association of Southeast Asian Nations would able to efficiently response to the MH370 challenge. On March 8 Malaysian Foreign Minister Anifah Aman informed the public that his country had asked help from other members of ASEAN. Yet in response 47 years old Association demonstrated a low-level readiness for such kind of events. It’s impossible even to find any information about ASEAN reaction on both the plane disappearance and Malaysian request on the website of the organization.

Ekaterina Koldunova, deputy dean of the School of Political Affairs at the Moscow State Institute of International Relations of the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, explained the unpreparedness of ASEAN: “ASEAN declares that it is not a military alliance. Yet there are regular exercises of military, counter piracy, and counterterrorism forces of ASEAN member states and external powers. These drills demonstrate that ASEAN is hardly to be regarded as a fully independent organization in the abovementioned fields, since external powers play important role in the exercises. However there are successful initiatives such as Eyes-in-the-Sky and Malacca Straits Coordinated Patrol. But regional powers had to start them to protect sea lanes against piracy, since the alternative option was to have navy deployment of the United States. ASEAN security cooperation faces limits, including lack of experience, proper equipment, and trust. Having a bunch of separatist, extremist, and terrorist groups, enjoying external support, regional countries are reluctant to deepen cooperation with each other.”

Headlines reflect public understanding of the ASEAN role in the MH370 search: “Flight MH370 Shows Limits of ASEAN’s Maritime Cooperation,” and “How Can We Trust ASEAN Integration?”

The missing Malaysia Airlines plane demonstrated an urgent need for expanding fields of the ASEAN security cooperation far beyond existing practices. Koldunova believes, that “the MH370 case must boost security cooperation of ASEAN and help them to regionalize security mechanisms of the Association.”

Deepening the ASEAN security cooperation should include following approaches among others:

  • The rapid response capability of ASEAN should be based on regional mechanisms;
     
  • The regional mechanisms should consist of well-timed crisis management, regional efforts coordination, and data sharing;
     
  • Aviation safety should be one of the main pillars of regional security.
Petr Topychkanov
Former Fellow, Nonproliferation Program, Moscow Center
Petr Topychkanov
SecurityMilitaryGlobal GovernanceForeign PolicyNorth AmericaUnited StatesEast AsiaChinaSoutheast Asia

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

  • Kushner and Putin shaking hands, with Witkoff standing next to them
    Commentary
    Emissary
    What If Trump Gets His Russia-Ukraine Deal?

    It’s dangerous to dismiss Washington’s shambolic diplomacy out of hand.

      Eric Ciaramella

  • Abstract of global AI
    Article
    South-South AI Collaboration: Advancing Practical Pathways

    The India AI Impact Summit offers a timely opportunity to experiment with and formalize new models of cooperation.

      Lakshmee Sharma, Jane Munga

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Taking the Pulse: Can the EU Attract Foreign Investment and Reduce Dependencies?

    EU member states clash over how to boost the union’s competitiveness: Some want to favor European industries in public procurement, while others worry this could deter foreign investment. So, can the EU simultaneously attract global capital and reduce dependencies?

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz, ed.

  • Article
    What Can the EU Do About Trump 2.0?

    Europe’s policy of subservience to the Trump administration has failed. For Washington to take the EU seriously, its leaders now need to combine engagement with robust pushback.

      Stefan Lehne

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    To Survive, the EU Must Split

    Leaning into a multispeed Europe that includes the UK is the way Europeans don’t get relegated to suffering what they must, while the mighty United States and China do what they want.

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Carnegie global logo, stacked
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NWWashington, DC, 20036-2103Phone: 202 483 7600Fax: 202 483 1840
  • Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
  • Donate
  • Programs
  • Events
  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Contact
  • Annual Reports
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Government Resources
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.