Commentary
Thomas de Waal
{
"authors": [
"Thomas de Waal"
],
"type": "commentary",
"centerAffiliationAll": "",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Carnegie Europe",
"Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Europe",
"programAffiliation": "",
"programs": [],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"Caucasus",
"Russia",
"Georgia"
],
"topics": [
"Political Reform",
"Foreign Policy"
]
}
Source: Getty
Commentary
Abkhazia: All Politics Is Local
Abkhazia is in crisis, but it is not a spillover from events in Ukraine. This is overwhelmingly a local crisis. For the past 20 years Abkhazia has lived in a world of its own.
Published on May 30, 2014
Abkhazia is in crisis. Late on May 27, the opposition took over the presidential administration building and Abkhaz President Alexander Ankvab left the city. Later the Abkhaz parliament passed a resolution of no-confidence in the prime minister and called on the president to resign.
It is tempting to see the current crisis as a spillover from events in Ukraine. That would be a mistake. This is overwhelmingly a local crisis. For the past 20 years, since it de facto broke away from Georgia, Abkhazia has lived in a world of its own.
Politics is made and disputed by the ethnic Abkhaz, who probably form less than half the current population—alongside Armenians, Georgians and Russians—but who constitute almost the entire political class in the republic.
Since he was elected in 2011, Ankvab has alienated a lot of this political class with a reputation for being aloof and indifferent to their problems.
Ankvab has had a bad six months. The Sochi Olympics, which Abkhaz hoped would bring an economic boon to the republic, were a disappointment and actually produced the opposite effect.
Russia’s annexation of Crimea also means that Moscow now controls a much more strategically valuable and reliable slice of the Black Sea coast, which lessens Abkhazia’s relative importance. Russian state money and tourism revenues which might have gone to Abkhazia are now likely to be diverted to Crimea.
The opposition is a diverse group and hard to characterize. One die-hard nationalist Russian commentator, has alleged—incredibly—that they are the instigators of a Western-backed coup.
Others see them as being backed by Moscow as a more reliable alternative than the difficult Ankvab—although the truth is probably that both the president and opposition have their patrons in Russia.
Two things can be said about the opposition with certainty. One is that most of them are disgruntled for being shut out of political office. Opposition leader Raul Khajimba is the perpetual nearly-man of Abkhaz politics having failed to win the presidency in 2004, when he was backed by Moscow, and again in 2011—when he was not. These men have also lost out by not getting access to the republic’s limited economic resources. The recent announcement of plans for oil exploration off the Abkhaz coast may have especially enraged them.
The second common denominator about the opposition is that they are generally more ethno-nationalist. They have made waves over the issue of plans for distribution of Abkhaz passports to the up to 50,000 ethnic Georgians living an uncertain existence in Gali district adjoining western Georgia. They allege that these Georgians, most of whom also have Georgian passports, could become a “fifth column.”
The immediate focus in the coming days will be on whether Ankvab and the opposition can agree on a political solution, perhaps through early elections. A longer-term concern is that Gali does not become the location of a new political—or even worse physical—battleground.
About the Author
Thomas de Waal
Senior Fellow, Carnegie Europe
De Waal is a senior fellow at Carnegie Europe, specializing in Eastern Europe and the Caucasus.
- Europolis, Where Europe Ends
- Taking the Pulse: Is It Time for Europe to Reengage With Belarus?Commentary
Thomas de Waal, ed.
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
- Taking the Pulse: Is France’s New Nuclear Doctrine Ambitious Enough?Commentary
French President Emmanuel Macron has unveiled his country’s new nuclear doctrine. Are the changes he has made enough to reassure France’s European partners in the current geopolitical context?
Rym Momtaz, ed.
- The Iran War’s Dangerous Fallout for EuropeCommentary
The drone strike on the British air base in Akrotiri brings Europe’s proximity to the conflict in Iran into sharp relief. In the fog of war, old tensions in the Eastern Mediterranean risk being reignited, and regional stakeholders must avoid escalation.
Marc Pierini
- India’s Foreign Policy in the Age of PopulismPaper
Domestic mobilization, personalized leadership, and nationalism have reshaped India’s global behavior.
Sandra Destradi
- The EU Needs a Third Way in IranCommentary
European reactions to the war in Iran have lost sight of wider political dynamics. The EU must position itself for the next phase of the crisis without giving up on its principles.
Richard Youngs
- Resetting Cyber Relations with the United StatesArticle
For years, the United States anchored global cyber diplomacy. As Washington rethinks its leadership role, the launch of the UN’s Cyber Global Mechanism may test how allies adjust their engagement.
Patryk Pawlak, Chris Painter
