As European leadership prepares for the sixteenth EU-India Summit, both sides must reckon with trade-offs in order to secure a mutually beneficial Free Trade Agreement.
Dinakar Peri
With the dissolution of the Soviet Union in December 1991, Ukraine—the second-most important economic contributor to the union after Russia—unshackled itself from years of subjugation.
Source: New York, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 2000
With the dissolution of the Soviet Union in December 1991, Ukraine—the second-most important economic contributor to the union after Russia—unshackled itself from years of subjugation. The newly gained freedom meant rebuilding the country to reflect Ukrainian nationalism. Radical economic reforms were dismissed; such an approach represented Russian rashness. Instead, Ukraine undertook a “gradualist” approach to reform, but the results have been worse.
In Economic Reform in Ukraine, editors Anders Åslund and Georges de Ménil show that despite intents to reform, Ukraine has had one of the worst growth performances in the post-communist world. In the past decade, the country ended up recreating a massive centralized bureaucracy, including mimicking Soviet-style foreign trade regulations.
This comprehensive and policy-oriented study—with contributions from leading reformers in the Ukrainian government and other economic advisers—is the essential guidebook to what Ukraine needs to do to begin solving major problems in macroeconomic stabilization, fiscal policy, the energy sector, privatization, the legal system, and pension reform. Ukrainian policy makers have long been cognizant of reform proposals and have understood the economic issues, the editors argue. It is now time for policy decisions and implementation.
Anders Åslund is a senior associate at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Georges de Ménil is professor of economics at the Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales in Paris. They served as co-directors of the Soros International Economic Advisory Group to the Ukrainian Government in the mid-1990s.
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
As European leadership prepares for the sixteenth EU-India Summit, both sides must reckon with trade-offs in order to secure a mutually beneficial Free Trade Agreement.
Dinakar Peri
African countries need to adapt to a new era of U.S. trade relations.
Kholofelo Kugler, Georgia Schaefer-Brown
Geological complexity and years of mismanagement mean the Venezuelan oil industry is not the big prize officials in Moscow and Washington appear to believe.
Sergey Vakulenko
In Donald Trump’s second term in office, the transatlantic relationship that helped define the postwar European project and global order appears broken. Is it time for Brussels to chart its own path?
Nathalie Tocci, Jan Techau
Beset by an increasingly hostile United States, internal divisions, and the threat of Russian aggression, the EU finds itself in a make-or-break moment. U.S. President Donald Trump calls it a decaying group of nations headed by weak leaders. Is Europe able to prove him wrong?
Thomas de Waal