REQUIRED IMAGE

REQUIRED IMAGE

article

Einstein's Nuclear Warning

Sixty-six years ago this month, Albert Einstein sent an urgent letter to President Franklin Delano Roosevelt.   “It may become possible,” he warned, “to set up a nuclear chain reaction in a large mass of uranium, by which vast amounts of power and large quantities of new radium like elements would be generated. Now it appears almost certain that this could be achieved in the immediate future.”  The military consequences were obvious.  “This new phenomenon would also lead to the construction of bombs, and it is conceivable -- though much less certain -- that extremely powerful bombs of a new type may thus be constructed. A single bomb of this type, carried by boat and exploded in a port, might very well destroy the whole port together with some of the surrounding territory.”  Worse, the Nazis might already be hard at work on just such a project,  “I understand that Germany has actually stopped the sale of uranium from the Czechoslovakian mines, which she has taken over.” (Read More)

Published on August 3, 2005

Sixty-six years ago this month, Albert Einstein sent an urgent letter to President Franklin Delano Roosevelt.   “It may become possible,” he warned, “to set up a nuclear chain reaction in a large mass of uranium, by which vast amounts of power and large quantities of new radium like elements would be generated. Now it appears almost certain that this could be achieved in the immediate future.”  The military consequences were obvious.  “This new phenomenon would also lead to the construction of bombs, and it is conceivable -- though much less certain -- that extremely powerful bombs of a new type may thus be constructed. A single bomb of this type, carried by boat and exploded in a port, might very well destroy the whole port together with some of the surrounding territory.”  Worse, the Nazis might already be hard at work on just such a project,  “I understand that Germany has actually stopped the sale of uranium from the Czechoslovakian mines, which she has taken over.”


Albert Einstein
Old Grove Rd.
Naseu Point
Peconic, Long Island

August 2, 1939

F. D. Roosevelt,
President of the Untied States,
White House
Washington, D.C.

Sir:


Some recent work by E. Fermi and L. Szilard, which has been communicated to me in manuscript, leads me to expect that the element uranium may be turned into a new and important source of energy in the immediate future. Certain aspects of the situation which has arisen seem to call for watchfulness and, if necessary, quick action on the part of the administration. I believe therefore that it is my duty to bring to your attention the following facts and recommendations:

In the course of the last four months it has been made probable -- through the work of Joliot in France as well as Fermi and Szilard in America -- that it may become possible to set up a nuclear chain reaction in a large mass of uranium, by which vast amounts of power and large quantities of new radium like elements would be generated. Now it appears almost certain that this could be achieved in the immediate future.

This new phenomenon would also lead to the construction of bombs, and it is conceivable -- though much less certain -- that extremely powerful bombs of a new type may thus be constructed. A single bomb of this type, carried by boat and exploded in a port, might very well destroy the whole port together with some of the surrounding territory. However, such bombs might very well prove to be too heavy for transportation by air.

The United States has only very poor [illegible] of uranium in moderate quantities. There is some good ore in Canada and the former Czechoslovakia, while the most important source of Uranium is Belgian Congo.

In view of this situation you may think it desirable to have some permanent contact maintained between the Administration and the group of physicists working on chain reactions in America. One possible way of achieving this might be for you to entrust with this task a person who has your confidence and who could perhaps serve in an unofficial capacity. His task might comprise the following:

  1. To approach Government Departments, keep them informed of the further development, and out forward recommendations for Government action, giving particular attention to the problem of uranium ore for the United States;
  2. To speed up the experimental work, which is at present being carried on within the limits of the budgets of University laboratories, by providing funds, if such funds be required, through his contacts with private persons who are willing to make a contribution for this cause, and perhaps also by obtaining the co-operation of industrial laboratories which have the necessary equipment.

I understand that Germany has actually stopped the sale of uranium from the Czechoslovakian mines, which she has taken over. That she should have taken such early action might perhaps be understood on the ground that the son of the German Under-Secretary of State, Von Weishlicker [sic], is attached to the Kaiser Wilheim Institute in Berlin where some of the American work on uranium is now being repeated.

Yours very truly,

Albert Einstein


Einstein’s letter came in the wake of the discovery of nuclear fission by German physicists Otto Hahn and Fritz Strassmann. The letter was drafted by Hungarian physicist Leo Szilard, now hard at work on his private nuclear research in the United States. Alexander Sachs, an economist and close personal advisor to the President, delivered the letter on October 11. Shortly after, Roosevelt established a "Uranium Committee" and provided modest funds of $6,000 towards the physicists’ research efforts. Roosevelt’s limited response was a cautious first step towards government involvement in nuclear research. Two years later, a day before the bombing of Pearl Harbor, the U.S. launched a full, industrial-scale effort to build the bomb.

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.