Anders Aslund
Economic Reform in Ukraine: The Unfinished Agenda
With the dissolution of the Soviet Union in December 1991, Ukraine—the second-most important economic contributor to the union after Russia—unshackled itself from years of subjugation.
Source: New York, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 2000
With the dissolution of the Soviet Union in December 1991, Ukraine—the second-most important economic contributor to the union after Russia—unshackled itself from years of subjugation. The newly gained freedom meant rebuilding the country to reflect Ukrainian nationalism. Radical economic reforms were dismissed; such an approach represented Russian rashness. Instead, Ukraine undertook a “gradualist” approach to reform, but the results have been worse.
In Economic Reform in Ukraine, editors Anders Åslund and Georges de Ménil show that despite intents to reform, Ukraine has had one of the worst growth performances in the post-communist world. In the past decade, the country ended up recreating a massive centralized bureaucracy, including mimicking Soviet-style foreign trade regulations.
This comprehensive and policy-oriented study—with contributions from leading reformers in the Ukrainian government and other economic advisers—is the essential guidebook to what Ukraine needs to do to begin solving major problems in macroeconomic stabilization, fiscal policy, the energy sector, privatization, the legal system, and pension reform. Ukrainian policy makers have long been cognizant of reform proposals and have understood the economic issues, the editors argue. It is now time for policy decisions and implementation.
Anders Åslund is a senior associate at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Georges de Ménil is professor of economics at the Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales in Paris. They served as co-directors of the Soros International Economic Advisory Group to the Ukrainian Government in the mid-1990s.
About the Author
Former Senior Associate, Director, Russian and Eurasian Program
- Putin's Decline and America's ResponseOther
- Democracy in Retreat in RussiaTestimony
Anders Aslund
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
- The Strategic Stakes of AGOA Reform and RenewalArticle
Strengthening U.S.-Africa trade and advancing U.S. interests aren’t conflicting goals.
Tyler Beckelman, Kholofelo Kugler
- Post U.S.-China Summit: Managed InstabilityCommentary
The U.S.-China Summit produced a welcome commitment to build a constructive, strategically stable relationship. However, the United States has a full agenda, including the USMCA review beginning this week, that will likely target Chinese practices of concern. If China views these efforts as inconsistent with the agreements reached in Beijing, it may slow or halt progress in response.
Barbara Weisel
- Russian Market Sours for Belarusian State CompaniesCommentary
Minsk’s faith in the future of its larger neighbor’s economy is fading as Belarusian firms in Russia see record losses.
Olga Loiko
- Did Putin Return From China Empty-Handed?Commentary
With no key agreement signed on the Power of Siberia 2 gas pipeline, there is a risk that the window of opportunity for Russia will close if Chinese power generation becomes so green that new gas sources are no longer of any interest to Beijing.
Alexander Gabuev
- Continental Asia and the Rise of Portfolio PoliticsArticle
“Central Asia” as an analytical category is itself part of the problem. The term is a Soviet administrative inheritance, drawn along lines that served the convenience of Moscow. The Central Asian states the Soviets named no longer see themselves through this category alone and are not aligning across political blocs but are instead building external partnerships sector by sector, assigning different partners to different functions.
Jennifer B. Murtazashvili