• Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Global logoCarnegie lettermark logo
DemocracyIran
  • Donate
REQUIRED IMAGE

REQUIRED IMAGE

Article

The Peace Process Has No Clothes

Link Copied
By Nathan J. Brown
Published on Jun 14, 2007

Additional Links

Full PDF Text
Program mobile hero image

Program

Democracy, Conflict, and Governance

The Democracy, Conflict, and Governance Program is a leading source of independent policy research, writing, and outreach on global democracy, conflict, and governance. It analyzes and seeks to improve international efforts to reduce democratic backsliding, mitigate conflict and violence, overcome political polarization, promote gender equality, and advance pro-democratic uses of new technologies.

Learn More
Program mobile hero image

Program

Middle East

The Middle East Program in Washington combines in-depth regional knowledge with incisive comparative analysis to provide deeply informed recommendations. With expertise in the Gulf, North Africa, Iran, and Israel/Palestine, we examine crosscutting themes of political, economic, and social change in both English and Arabic.

Learn More

One month before the most vicious round of intra-Palestinian fighting in Gaza, Lieutenant General Keith Dayton, the American security coordinator in the Israeli-Palestinian arena, testified before Congress, seeking to justify American intervention on the side of Fatah using the terms that have grown familiar over years of Israeli-Palestinian diplomacy.  He explained that the United States sought to back the legal presidential security forces—who were working to meet Palestinian obligations under the Road Map—against the forces of disorder.  The statement may have made sense according to some logic followed in the US capital, but it was utterly disconnected from realities in the region. 

Fatah—as much if not more than Hamas—bears deep responsibility for the deepening chaos in Palestinian society.  And American policy has deepened that chaos in some fundamental and absolutely deliberate ways.  There is no peace process for Hamas and Fatah to fight over.  The Road Map was already anachronistic when it was announced in 2003 and is pursued seriously now by none of the concerned parties.  Even General Dayton’s description of the legal situation was simply wrong: the Palestinian constitution was amended in 2003 at American insistence to make internal security a cabinet and not a presidential responsibility.  While officials spoke of peace and order, American policy in effect—and sometimes by design—supported the political disintegration of Palestinian society and the slide toward civil war.

Click on PDF icon above to read full commentary

About the Author

Nathan J. Brown

Nonresident Senior Fellow, Middle East Program

Nathan J. Brown, a professor of political science and international affairs at George Washington University, is a distinguished scholar and author of nine books on Arab politics and governance, as well as editor of five books.

    Recent Work

  • Commentary
    Israel’s Election Had No Clear Winner. What Comes Next for the Region?
      • +9

      Nathan J. Brown, Alper Coşkun, Amr Hamzawy, …

  • Commentary
    Old Wine in New Battles

      Nathan J. Brown

Nathan J. Brown
Nonresident Senior Fellow, Middle East Program
Nathan J. Brown

Additional Links

Full PDF Text
Middle EastIsraelPolitical ReformDemocracyForeign Policy

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

  • US Capitol building with a evening sky
    Commentary
    Emissary
    Three Ways the New Democratic Congress Could Constrain Trump on Foreign Policy

    How Capitol Hill might reassert checks on the executive branch.

      • Jennifer Hendrixson White

      Jennifer Hendrixson White

  • Article
    Turkey’s Four Headaches Are Also Europe’s

    Between stalled economic ties and a push for greater security cooperation, EU-Turkey relations remain uncertain. Ankara’s continued slide toward autocracy is the likeliest common denominator in these competing dynamics.

      Marc Pierini

  • Article
    Nuclear Deterrence Needs to Account for Domestic Politics

    Individual leaders and public attitudes—especially in democracies—matter for credibility.

      • A white man with short dark hair and a goatee wears a gray suit

      Lauren Sukin, Samuel Seitz

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Member States Must Make Enlargement Their Own

    The European Commission is preparing the EU for its next enlargement. But member states need to make it a project that European citizens can understand, shape, and support.

      Iliriana Gjoni

  • President of the EU Council Antonio Luis Santos da Costa (L) the Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy (C) and the President of the European Commission Ursula von der Leyen (R) talk to the media prior to the start of the second day of an EU Summit in the Europa building, the EU Council headquarter prior to an EU Summit on October 16, 2026, in Brussels, Belgium.
    Article
    Europe Struggles to Sustain Support for Ukraine

    EU and member-state leaders will need to show the political will and flexibility to adjust to Ukraine’s changing needs and to find compromises that will put support on a sustainable, long-term footing.

      Phyllis Berry

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Carnegie global logo, stacked
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NWWashington, DC, 20036-2103Phone: 202 483 7600
  • Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
  • Donate
  • Programs
  • Events
  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Contact
  • Annual Reports
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Government Resources
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.