Commentary
Thomas de Waal
{
"authors": [
"Thomas de Waal"
],
"type": "commentary",
"centerAffiliationAll": "",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Carnegie Europe",
"Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Europe",
"programAffiliation": "",
"programs": [],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"Middle East",
"Israel",
"Caucasus",
"Russia",
"Azerbaijan",
"Armenia",
"Georgia"
],
"topics": [
"Economy",
"Trade",
"Foreign Policy"
]
}
Source: Getty
Commentary
Queuing for Russia’s Food Market
The list of countries wanting to take advantage of Western sanctions to boost their food exports to Russia has nothing in common but the desire to gain a new market.
Published on Oct 1, 2014
International sanctions on Russia are having multiple but mysterious effects.
Russia’s currency has slid, with a dollar now worth almost 40 rubles. The unexpected criminal charges against billionaire Vladimir Yevtushenkov may be the result of a new round of economic and political austerity. As one analyst told the Financial Times, “Now they’re going after people who are not part of the inner circle. In these times neutrality is no longer enough.”
Every day, reports come in of countries keen to cash in on the rupture of trade between Russia on the one hand and the United States, Japan, and most of Europe on the other.
These new trading partners have nothing in common except willingness to gain a new market.
In the case of Israel and Russia, it is a matter of making up for a double trade ban. On September 1, the European Union announced new restrictions on Israeli imports following the summer offensive against Gaza. Israel and Russia evidently hope they can exchange products with each other that are not going to or from Europe.
Meanwhile, Egypt and Russia are discussing a new free trade agreement. Argentinian and Brazilian ministers are talking about how they can take the opportunity to export more agricultural products to the Russian market.
Closer to home, Armenia sees an opportunity to boost its faltering economy. President Serzh Sargsyan has talked of “great opportunities for our agricultural producers” and the agriculture minister says he wants to see exports double.
Azerbaijan, which has assured the West of its support for Ukraine in the current crisis, recently hosted a senior Russian delegation led by Moscow’s main troubleshooter for its neighborhood, Dmitry Rogozin. Azerbaijan’s Deputy Prime Minister Yagub Eyyubov told his visitors, “The European Union is putting pressure on Russia but no one will break the Russian Federation, it will never bend.”
For Russia, this is a matter of “food security,” for Azerbaijan it is a new market opportunity.
For Russia’s neighbors in the Caucasus this is also an instance where, in a relationship where Russia is generally perceived to hold all the cards, they gain some leverage of their own. Even Georgia is expanding its trade relationship with Russia, despite the recent suspension of their 1994 free trade agreement. Exports of Georgian wine to Russia surged by 65 percent in the first seven months of this year.
For all the big declarations, it looks highly unlikely that Azerbaijan tomatoes, Armenian apples, and Argentinian beef can smoothly and silently take up the empty place in the Russian market left by France, Greece, or Poland. The last time Russia underwent such a massive market disruption, in the late 1980s and early 1990s, it took years to rectify.
The politics of it may be more important for Moscow—a demonstration that there is a multi-polar world out there, in trade at least.
About the Author
Thomas de Waal
Senior Fellow, Carnegie Europe
Thomas de Waal is a senior fellow at Carnegie Europe, specializing in Eastern Europe and the Caucasus.
- There Is No Shortcut for Europe in Armenia
- Rewiring the South Caucasus: TRIPP and the New Geopolitics of ConnectivityArticle
Thomas de Waal, Areg Kochinyan, Zaur Shiriyev
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
- A Geographic and Social Reconfiguration in LebanonCommentary
Israel is encroaching on the country’s territory, while the Lebanese look askance at one another.
Issam Kayssi
- Pushing Beirut into an Armed Conflict With Hezbollah Is InsaneCommentary
The party’s domestic and regional roles have changed, so Lebanon should devise a disarmament strategy that encompasses this.
Michael Young
- Continental Asia and the Rise of Portfolio PoliticsArticle
“Central Asia” as an analytical category is itself part of the problem. The term is a Soviet administrative inheritance, drawn along lines that served the convenience of Moscow. The Central Asian states the Soviets named no longer see themselves through this category alone and are not aligning across political blocs but are instead building external partnerships sector by sector, assigning different partners to different functions.
Jennifer B. Murtazashvili
- Palestine’s Climate Change Planning Faces Its LimitsArticle
Barriers ranging from weak legal frameworks to ongoing, occupation-related limitations are constraining Palestine from achieving its ambitious climate targets.
Joy Arkeh, Nabil Nasser
- In Russia, Private Companies Have Been Left to Pick Up the Tab for Ukrainian Drone AttacksCommentary
The cost of air defense has become an unregistered tax on revenue for businesses. While military rents are consolidated in the federal budget, the costs of defense are being spread across the balance sheets of companies and regional governments.
Alexandra Prokopenko
