• Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Global logoCarnegie lettermark logo
DemocracyIran
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Temur Umarov"
  ],
  "type": "commentary",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie China"
  ],
  "collections": [
    "Carnegie China Commentaries"
  ],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie China",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "China",
    "Kazakhstan",
    "Tajikistan",
    "Russia"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Foreign Policy"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

Commentary
Carnegie China

What Does Xi Jinping Want From Central Asia?

China’s growing attention to Central Asia is perceived as a harbinger of tectonic shifts in regional geopolitics.

Link Copied
By Temur Umarov
Published on Jul 5, 2024

This publication is a product of Carnegie China. For more work by Carnegie China, click here.

On July 3, Chinese President Xi Jinping visited Kazakhstan for the fifth time since assuming power in 2012. That visit puts Kazakhstan on par with the United States and France in terms of the frequency of Xi’s visits. The only country he has visited more frequently is Russia (nine times).

Following his state visit to Kazakhstan and participation in the 24th summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), Xi travelled to another Central Asian state: Tajikistan. That visit to Dushanbe marks the first time the Chinese leader has visited the country without participating in a multilateral event. Xi combined his previous trips to Tajikistan with the SCO summit in 2014 and the Conference on Interaction and Confidence-Building Measures in Asia in 2019.

Considering that since the end of the global COVID pandemic, Xi has been selective in his foreign visits, this mini tour of Central Asia by the Chinese leader signals the region’s importance in Beijing’s foreign policy priorities in the coming years.

Kazakhstan and Tajikistan hold unique significance for Beijing in Central Asia. While Kazakhstan serves as the main economic partner, attracting the largest share of Chinese investment in the region and functioning as the primary transit hub between China and Europe, Tajikistan plays a crucial role as Beijing’s key security partner in the area.

The increased attention on China in Central Asia is underscored by the fact that the region’s traditional dominant power—Russia—is struggling to maintain its appeal and is itself increasingly becoming dependent on Beijing.

Against this backdrop, China’s growing attention to Central Asia is perceived as a harbinger of tectonic shifts in regional geopolitics. Last year’s grandiose inaugural China-Central Asia Summit in Xi’an is often cited as evidence that China is supplanting Russia in the region. Similarly, Xi Jinping’s statement affirming support for Kazakhstan’s sovereignty and territorial integrity is seen as further confirmation of Beijing’s commitments.

For those seeking empirical proof of changing power dynamics in Central Asia, trade data provides compelling insights. Over the past two years, China has surged ahead of Russia. Trade turnover between China and the five Central Asian nations surpassed $70 billion in 2022 (compared to $42 billion with Russia). By 2023, trade turnover with China was more than double what it was with Russia, reaching $90 billion.

However, the reality on the ground remains nuanced.

Firstly, Beijing’s statements of support for sovereignty and territorial integrity do not necessarily translate into China assuming greater responsibility as a new security guarantor for the region’s states. To illustrate how Beijing’s declarations often have limited impact in the real world, consider China’s stance regarding the war in Ukraine. While officially supporting Ukraine’s territorial integrity, China simultaneously maintains close ties with Russia and even supports the Kremlin’s military capabilities.

Secondly, even prior to the conflict in Ukraine, China’s economic positions in Central Asia were more dynamic and visible than Russia’s. Consequently, it comes as no surprise that the recovery from the COVID-induced economic downturn has been particularly robust in China’s partnership with Central Asia.

Furthermore, the war in Ukraine and the sanctions imposed on Russia over its aggression have inadvertently led to increased trade between Beijing and Central Asia. The region now serves as a reexport hub for products destined for Russia, allowing some countries to avoid direct exports and potential secondary sanctions.

In fact, the dynamics between China and Central Asia represent a continuation of trends that have unfolded over the past few decades. Crucially, it is the Central Asian states themselves that are seeking to diversify their foreign policy engagements. Rather than choosing between Russia and China, they recognize the value of having both powers actively involved in the region. Furthermore, Central Asia is fostering internal cooperation and forging partnerships with various non-regional players, from Japan and South Korea to Gulf countries and Türkiye.

China, too, remains committed to longstanding goals in the region. Beijing views Kazakhstan as its primary economic partner in Central Asia, with approximately half of China’s trade and investment directed toward Kazakhstan. The transit opportunities that have arisen since Russia’s invasion further align with China’s economic interests there.

As for Tajikistan, Beijing’s primary concern is security. Since Xi’s last visit to Dushanbe in 2019, there are certain adjustments that need to be discussed. Importantly, following the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan, Tajikistan’s role as a security buffer zone has become even more significant. Additionally, this visit may mark the last time Xi meets with Tajikistan’s long-serving president, Emomali Rahmon, in his homeland. Given that the Tajik political regime is preparing for a transition of power from father to son, it’s an opportune moment to become better acquainted with the successor.

All of this begs the question: What does Russia think about Xi’s visit to Central Asia? Those seeking signs of a simmering conflict between Moscow and Beijing may find them in misguided assumptions about their overlapping interests in the region.

However, what often goes unnoticed is the level of coordination that China and Russia are actively pursuing in Central Asia. For three consecutive years, joint statements signed during bilateral summits between the Chinese and Russian leaders have emphasized cooperation and joint efforts in countering the “import of color revolutions” (referring to Western influence).

While authoritarian Central Asian states may also have concerns about hidden Western involvement in local social issues, the very public discussions between Moscow and Beijing regarding the fate of the region’s independent states do not necessarily sit well with local leadership. Perhaps for this reason, Russian President Vladimir Putin, following his recent trip to China, reached out to the presidents of Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan to inform them about the visit.

About the Author

Temur Umarov

Fellow, Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center

Temur Umarov is an expert on China and Central Asia, and a fellow at the Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center.

    Recent Work

  • Commentary
    Why Has Kazakhstan Started Deporting Political Activists?

      Temur Umarov

  • Commentary
    Why Are China and Russia Not Rushing to Help Iran?
      • Alexander Gabuev

      Alexander Gabuev, Temur Umarov

Temur Umarov
Fellow, Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
Temur Umarov
Foreign PolicyChinaKazakhstanTajikistanRussia

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Time to Merge the Commission and EEAS

    The EU is structurally incapable of reacting to today’s foreign policy crises. The union must fold the EEAS into the European Commission and create a security council better prepared to take action on the global stage.

      Stefan Lehne

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    What the Russian Energy Sector Stands to Gain From War in the Middle East

    The future trajectory of the U.S.-Iran war remains uncertain, but its impact on global energy trade flows and ties will be far-reaching. Moscow is likely to become a key beneficiary of these changes; the crisis in the Gulf also strengthens Russia’s hand in its relationships with China and India, where advantages might prove more durable.

      • Sergey Vakulenko

      Sergey Vakulenko

  • Trump with arms out, surrounded by mics
    Commentary
    Emissary
    The Problem With the Idea That Netanyahu Made Trump Attack Iran

    Going to war was the U.S. president’s decision, for which he alone is responsible.

      Daniel C. Kurtzer, Aaron David Miller

  • Implementing the Biden Administration’s China Strategy
    Report
    Implementing the Biden Administration’s China Strategy

    At the heart of Biden’s approach to China was the consolidation of a framework for strategic competition with an eye toward coexistence.

      • Senkai Hsia

      Christopher S. Chivvis, Senkai Hsia

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    “Mr. Nobody Against Putin”: A Deep Dive Into Russian Propaganda

    Talankin and Borenstein’s documentary is a unique inside look at a regime that threatens the world and has killed thousands of people in its neighboring country. And many critics and general viewers alike draw parallels between the Putin regime and their own governments.

      Ekaterina Barabash

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Carnegie global logo, stacked
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NWWashington, DC, 20036-2103Phone: 202 483 7600Fax: 202 483 1840
  • Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
  • Donate
  • Programs
  • Events
  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Contact
  • Annual Reports
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Government Resources
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.